BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

6 results for “transfer pricing”+ Section 65Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Cochin57Hyderabad52Delhi31Mumbai25Chennai22Indore6Jaipur6Bangalore5Chandigarh4Jodhpur1

Key Topics

Section 153C11Section 1326Addition to Income6Section 143(3)5Section 133A4Section 153A4Survey u/s 133A4Search & Seizure4Section 69A

ANSHU SAHAI (HUF),JAIPUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, CENTRAL CIRCLE

ITA 468/JPR/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur03 Nov 2025AY 2018-19
For Appellant: Sh. Rajeev Sogani, CA &For Respondent: Sh. Sanjay Dhariwal, CIT-DR
Section 115BSection 132Section 133ASection 153CSection 153D

section 65A & 65B of the \nEvidence Act has not been followed by the assessing authority. However the \ncontention of the appellant is mere based on presumptions and assumptions. \nFurther the appellant has stated that the learned AO has not mentioned in the \nsaid section that steps were taken in this regard. However there is no requirement \nto record such satisfaction

VIRENDRA SINGH RATNAWAT,JAIPUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, JAIPUR

3
Section 1273
Section 153D2

In the result, three appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 179/JPR/2022[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur01 Jan 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Sh. S. R. Sharma (CA) &For Respondent: Sh. Ajay Malik (CIT)
Section 127Section 132Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 153ASection 69A

65B of the Evidence At are not compiled with, as the law now stands in India.” Further recently, in ACIT vs. Katrina Rosemary Turcotte [ITA Nos. 3092/Mum./2015 to 3097/Mum./2015, decided on 11.10.2017[ The Hon'ble ITAT Mumbai held that addition made on the basis of a print out taken from the computer of a third party without there

VIRENDRA SINGH RATNAWAT,JAIPUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, JAIPUR

In the result, three appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 180/JPR/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur01 Jan 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Sh. S. R. Sharma (CA) &For Respondent: Sh. Ajay Malik (CIT)
Section 127Section 132Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 153ASection 69A

65B of the Evidence At are not compiled with, as the law now stands in India.” Further recently, in ACIT vs. Katrina Rosemary Turcotte [ITA Nos. 3092/Mum./2015 to 3097/Mum./2015, decided on 11.10.2017[ The Hon'ble ITAT Mumbai held that addition made on the basis of a print out taken from the computer of a third party without there

VIRENDRA SINGH RATNAWAT,JAIPUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, JAIPUR

In the result, three appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 181/JPR/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur01 Jan 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Sh. S. R. Sharma (CA) &For Respondent: Sh. Ajay Malik (CIT)
Section 127Section 132Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 153ASection 69A

65B of the Evidence At are not compiled with, as the law now stands in India.” Further recently, in ACIT vs. Katrina Rosemary Turcotte [ITA Nos. 3092/Mum./2015 to 3097/Mum./2015, decided on 11.10.2017[ The Hon'ble ITAT Mumbai held that addition made on the basis of a print out taken from the computer of a third party without there

DCIT, CC-1, JAIPUR vs. M/S. DANGAYACH HOTELS PRIVATE LIMITED, JAIPUR

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 33/JPR/2020[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur22 Oct 2021AY 2011-12
For Appellant: Shri S.R. Sharma (C.A) &For Respondent: Shri B. K. Gupta (CIT) fu/kZkfjrh dh vksj ls@
Section 132Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 148Section 153ASection 153C

Section 65B (2).” 36. It was submitted that the Apex Court held that these safeguards are taken to ensure the ‘source and authenticity’, which are “the two hallmarks pertaining to electronic record sought to be used as evidence. The importance of following this procedure was emphasized by the fact that electronic records are more susceptible to tampering, alteration, transposition, excision

VIRENDRA PRAKASH SHARMA,JAIPUR vs. DCIT CIRCLE (INTL TAX), JAIPUR, JAIPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 286/JPR/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur16 Jul 2025AY 2020-21
For Appellant: Shri Rajeev Sogani, CA &For Respondent: Smt. Runi Pal, CIT (Th. VC)
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 144C(13)Section 144C(5)Section 153CSection 69

65B certificate, hash value, or chain-of-custody\ndocument has been filed here; consequently, the chat extracts fail at the threshold\nof admissibility.\n\n1.9.iv In Central Bureau of Investigation v. V.C. Shukla (1998) 3 SCC 410,\nprovisions of Section 34 of the Evidence Act, was considered for the purposes of\nthe expression \"entries in books of account\", \"books