DCIT, JAIPUR vs. JAIPUR RUGS COMPANY (P) LTD., JAIPUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed and appeal filed by the Revenue stands dismissed

Transfer Pricing Officer or any other authority; (e) records relating to the draft order; (f) evidence collected by, or caused to be collected by, it; and (g) result of any enquiry made by, or caused to be made by, it. (7) The Dispute Resolution Panel may, before issuing any directions referred to in sub-section (5),— (a) make such further

SHRI MADHO LAL SAINI,JAIPUR vs. ITO, WARD-2(3), JAIPUR

In the result, the appeals of the assessees are allowed

Bench: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

153B. 53. The question now is - what is the scope of assessment or reassessment of total income u/s 153A (1) (b) and the first proviso? We are of the view that for answering this question, guidance will have to be sought from section 132(1). If any books of account or other documents relevant to the assessment had not been

M/S. JHANDEWALA FOODS LIMITED 35, JOHARI BAZAR, JAIPUR,JAIPUR vs. ACIT CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR

In the result, the ground no

Transfer Pricing Officer or any other authority; (e) records relating to the draft order; (f) evidence collected by, or caused to be collected by, it; and (g) result of any enquiry made by, or caused to be made by, it. (7) The Dispute Resolution Panel may, before issuing any directions referred to in sub-section (5),— (a) make such further

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,EXEMPTIONS,CIRCLE,JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. GLOBAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY SOCIETY, JAIPUR RAJASTHAN

In the results the appeal of the revenue stands dismissed

Bench: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

153B(1)(b) 1-5 dated 31.03.2015 for assessment year 2013-14 2. Copy of CIT(A)’s order dated 30.11.2016 for assessment year 6-17 2013-14 3. Copy of ITAT order dated 30.10.2017 for assessment year 18-26 2013-14 & 2014-15 4. Copy of notice u/s 148 dated 28.03.2019 27 5. Copy of notice u/s 142(1

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, KOTA vs. M/S. MULTI METAL PRIVATE LTD., KOTA

153B(1)(b) of the Act. 2. All the appeals as well as the cross objections are being heard together and for the sake of convenience, a composite order is being passed. 3. The assessee is a group concern of Kota Dall Mill (KDM) group and subjected to the search and seizure action U/s 132 of the Act carried

M/S. MULTI METAL PRIVATE LTD.,KOTA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, KOTA

153B(1)(b) of the Act. 2. All the appeals as well as the cross objections are being heard together and for the sake of convenience, a composite order is being passed. 3. The assessee is a group concern of Kota Dall Mill (KDM) group and subjected to the search and seizure action U/s 132 of the Act carried

M/S. MULTI METAL PRIVATE LTD.,KOTA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, KOTA

153B(1)(b) of the Act. 2. All the appeals as well as the cross objections are being heard together and for the sake of convenience, a composite order is being passed. 3. The assessee is a group concern of Kota Dall Mill (KDM) group and subjected to the search and seizure action U/s 132 of the Act carried

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, KOTA vs. M/S. MULTI METAL PRIVATE LTD., KOTA

153B(1)(b) of the Act. 2. All the appeals as well as the cross objections are being heard together and for the sake of convenience, a composite order is being passed. 3. The assessee is a group concern of Kota Dall Mill (KDM) group and subjected to the search and seizure action U/s 132 of the Act carried

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, KOTA vs. M/S. MULTI METAL PRIVATE LTD., KOTA

153B(1)(b) of the Act. 2. All the appeals as well as the cross objections are being heard together and for the sake of convenience, a composite order is being passed. 3. The assessee is a group concern of Kota Dall Mill (KDM) group and subjected to the search and seizure action U/s 132 of the Act carried

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, KOTA vs. M/S. MULTI METAL PRIVATE LTD., KOTA

153B(1)(b) of the Act. 2. All the appeals as well as the cross objections are being heard together and for the sake of convenience, a composite order is being passed. 3. The assessee is a group concern of Kota Dall Mill (KDM) group and subjected to the search and seizure action U/s 132 of the Act carried

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, KOTA vs. M/S. MULTI METAL PRIVATE LTD., KOTA

153B(1)(b) of the Act. 2. All the appeals as well as the cross objections are being heard together and for the sake of convenience, a composite order is being passed. 3. The assessee is a group concern of Kota Dall Mill (KDM) group and subjected to the search and seizure action U/s 132 of the Act carried

M/S. MULTI METAL PRIVATE LTD.,KOTA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, KOTA

153B(1)(b) of the Act. 2. All the appeals as well as the cross objections are being heard together and for the sake of convenience, a composite order is being passed. 3. The assessee is a group concern of Kota Dall Mill (KDM) group and subjected to the search and seizure action U/s 132 of the Act carried

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, KOTA vs. M/S. MULTI METAL PRIVATE LTD., KOTA

153B(1)(b) of the Act. 2. All the appeals as well as the cross objections are being heard together and for the sake of convenience, a composite order is being passed. 3. The assessee is a group concern of Kota Dall Mill (KDM) group and subjected to the search and seizure action U/s 132 of the Act carried

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, AJMER vs. M/S SILVERTOSS COMMODITIES PVT. LTD., KOLKATA

The appeals of the revenue stand dismissed and the cross objections of the assessee are partly allowed

section 153A of the Act. Thus the said judgment is inapplicable under the facts of the present case. Another judgment cited by ld. D/R is in the case of Harshvardhan Johari vs. DCIT (2020) 118 taxmann.com 449 (Jaipur-Trib) wherein it was held that the notice under section 143(2) of the Act was not issued though the time

JUHI BHANDARI, JAIPUR,JAIPUR vs. DCIT CIRCLE (INTL TAX), JAIPUR, JAIPUR

In the result, both appeals of the assessee are allowed

transfer\npricing orders wherein downward adjustments were made to the price\npaid for the equipment imported by the AE. The Assessee had filed an\nappeal to this Tribunal against the appellate order for Assessment Year\n2013-14 (arising from the assessment under Section 143(3) and the TPO\norder). This appeal was disposed in RKM POWERGEN PRIVATE\nLIMITED

WHOLE SALE CLOTH MERCHANT ASSOCIATION ,KOTA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE KOTA , KOTA

price) from the concerning person of all the 22 plots has not been taken in books. 4. The trust property is used Personal benefit of the president Shri Tejndra Pal Singh has taken loan & advances of Rs.31,50,000/- from the trust and violated the provisions of section 13(2) of the Act. Further no proper books of accounts have

ST. WILFRED EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,JAIPUR vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL) RAJASTHAN, JAIPUR

153B(1)(b) on 28.12.2018 for A.Y 2017-18, the assessment year pertaining to previous year in which search was conducted. A copy of the assessment order for the A.Y. 2017-18 is enclosed and marked as Annexure A/2. In view of this fact, there is no reason to penalise the Appellant Society by cancelling its registration

ST. WILFRED EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,JAIPUR vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL) RAJASTHAN, JAIPUR

153B(1)(b) on 28.12.2018 for A.Y 2017-18, the assessment year pertaining to previous year in which search was conducted. A copy of the assessment order for the A.Y. 2017-18 is enclosed and marked as Annexure A/2. In view of this fact, there is no reason to penalise the Appellant Society by cancelling its registration