BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “section 68”+ Section 92Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai38Delhi37Bangalore29Pune13Kolkata12Chennai7Hyderabad6Ahmedabad5Karnataka5Jaipur4Indore1Allahabad1

Key Topics

Section 92C12Section 92C(2)4Addition to Income4TP Method4

DCIT, JAIPUR vs. M/S JAIPUR RUGS COMPANY PVT. LTD., JAIPUR

Appeals are allowed for statistical purposes only

ITA 738/JPR/2012[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur22 Jan 2019AY 2008-09
For Appellant: Shri Rajiv Sogani (CA)For Respondent: Shri Varinder Mehta (CIT-DR) &
Section 92CSection 92C(2)

68,461.30. Accordingly, the TPO has proposed the total adjustment U/s 92CA of Rs. 2,60,74,702/-. 4. The assessee challenged the action of the TPO/A.O. before the ld. CIT(A). The ld. CIT(A) has accepted the method applied by the assessee for benchmarking of international transaction and held that the price of DCIT Vs. M/s Jaipur Rugs

DCIT, JAIPUR vs. JAIPUR RUGS COMPANY (P) LTD., JAIPUR

Appeals are allowed for statistical purposes only

ITA 1083/JPR/2016[2009-10]Status: Disposed
ITAT Jaipur
22 Jan 2019
AY 2009-10
For Appellant: Shri Rajiv Sogani (CA)For Respondent: Shri Varinder Mehta (CIT-DR) &
Section 92CSection 92C(2)

68,461.30. Accordingly, the TPO has proposed the total adjustment U/s 92CA of Rs. 2,60,74,702/-. 4. The assessee challenged the action of the TPO/A.O. before the ld. CIT(A). The ld. CIT(A) has accepted the method applied by the assessee for benchmarking of international transaction and held that the price of DCIT Vs. M/s Jaipur Rugs

JAIPUR RUGS COMPANY PVT. LTD.,JAIPUR vs. ACIT, JAIPUR

Appeals are allowed for statistical purposes only

ITA 1125/JPR/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur22 Jan 2019AY 2010-11
For Appellant: Shri Rajiv Sogani (CA)For Respondent: Shri Varinder Mehta (CIT-DR) &
Section 92CSection 92C(2)

68,461.30. Accordingly, the TPO has proposed the total adjustment U/s 92CA of Rs. 2,60,74,702/-. 4. The assessee challenged the action of the TPO/A.O. before the ld. CIT(A). The ld. CIT(A) has accepted the method applied by the assessee for benchmarking of international transaction and held that the price of DCIT Vs. M/s Jaipur Rugs

JAIPUR RUGS COMPANY PVT. LTD.,JAIPUR vs. DCIT, JAIPUR

Appeals are allowed for statistical purposes only

ITA 1124/JPR/2016[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur22 Jan 2019AY 2009-10
For Appellant: Shri Rajiv Sogani (CA)For Respondent: Shri Varinder Mehta (CIT-DR) &
Section 92CSection 92C(2)

68,461.30. Accordingly, the TPO has proposed the total adjustment U/s 92CA of Rs. 2,60,74,702/-. 4. The assessee challenged the action of the TPO/A.O. before the ld. CIT(A). The ld. CIT(A) has accepted the method applied by the assessee for benchmarking of international transaction and held that the price of DCIT Vs. M/s Jaipur Rugs