ACIT, JAIPUR vs. NIRMAL GLASSTECH INDUSTRIES, JAIPUR
In the result, the revenue’s appeal is dismissed and the assessee’s
ITA 963/JPR/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur21 Apr 2017AY 2012-13
For Appellant: Shri P.C. Parwal (CA)For Respondent: Shri R.A. Verma (Addl.CIT) fu/kZkfjrh dh vksj ls@
Section 143(3)Section 68Section 80I
68 of the I.T. Act, 1961. It was further held that since nothing has been mentioned regarding interest the same can also be treated as gift received and can be added as the income of the assessee under section 56 of the I.T. Act, 1961. In the present proceedings, the Authorized Representative submitted that Shri
Nirmal Mundra partner