SHAMBHU DAYAL,KOTA vs. ITO, WARD -2(2), KOTA
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed as indicated hereinabove
ITA 988/JPR/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur21 Nov 2024AY 2015-16
Bench: DR. S. SEETHA LAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)
For Appellant: Shri Vinod Kumar Gupta, CAFor Respondent: Shri Anup Singh, Addl. CIT-DR
Section 139Section 147Section 148Section 148ASection 271(1)(c)Section 69ASection 80C
55A.
6. Under the facts and circumstances, Ld. CIT(A) has erred by allowing the deduction of Rs. 1,50,000/-u/s 80C of the Income Tax Act
7. Under the facts and circumstances, the Ld. A.O. has erred by initiating penalty proceeding under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.’’
2.1
Brief facts
