BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “section 68”+ Section 276Cclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi35Mumbai11Chandigarh8Pune6Jaipur5Bangalore4Ahmedabad4Kolkata3SC2Agra1Telangana1Allahabad1Chennai1HARJIT SINGH BEDI CHANDRAMAULI KR. PRASAD1Hyderabad1Jodhpur1Karnataka1Lucknow1Patna1

Key Topics

Addition to Income5Section 271(1)4Section 143(3)4Search & Seizure4Section 271(1)(c)3Section 69A3Section 1323Section 133A3Section 1273Section 153A

URMILA RAJENDRA MUNDRA,AJMER vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(2), AJMER, AJMER

In the result grounds raised by the assessee is allowed

ITA 577/JPR/2025[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur01 Aug 2025AY 2022-23

Bench: SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member), SHRI NARINDER KUMAR (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Sh. Sunil Porwal, CAFor Respondent: Sh. Gautam Singh Choudhary, JCIT
Section 250Section 270ASection 270A(1)

68 (Rule 129) which also has been denied by AO since considered such disallowances as “MISREPORTING” enclosed copy of notice u/sec. 270AA dated 02/05/2024 of Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(2), Ajmer. (Page 3 to 4) Under similar circumstances; Hon’ble ITAT in Appeal No. 68/JODH/2024 A.Y. 2017-18 in case of Triupati Jewellers Jodhpur has held; Copy Enclosed. (Page

VIRENDRA SINGH RATNAWAT,JAIPUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, JAIPUR

3
Survey u/s 133A3
Penalty2

In the result, three appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 180/JPR/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur01 Jan 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Sh. S. R. Sharma (CA) &For Respondent: Sh. Ajay Malik (CIT)
Section 127Section 132Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 153ASection 69A

68 to 69D, also needs to be understood in the same manner, as attempt to evade tax/penalty/ interest etc. Therefore, a conjoint reading of section 115BBE with section 68/69A and explanation to section 276C

VIRENDRA SINGH RATNAWAT,JAIPUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, JAIPUR

In the result, three appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 179/JPR/2022[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur01 Jan 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Sh. S. R. Sharma (CA) &For Respondent: Sh. Ajay Malik (CIT)
Section 127Section 132Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 153ASection 69A

68 to 69D, also needs to be understood in the same manner, as attempt to evade tax/penalty/ interest etc. Therefore, a conjoint reading of section 115BBE with section 68/69A and explanation to section 276C

VIRENDRA SINGH RATNAWAT,JAIPUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, JAIPUR

In the result, three appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 181/JPR/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur01 Jan 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Sh. S. R. Sharma (CA) &For Respondent: Sh. Ajay Malik (CIT)
Section 127Section 132Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 153ASection 69A

68 to 69D, also needs to be understood in the same manner, as attempt to evade tax/penalty/ interest etc. Therefore, a conjoint reading of section 115BBE with section 68/69A and explanation to section 276C

KANHAIYALAL RAMESHWAR DAS,KOTA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3, JAIPUR

ITA 1454/JPR/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur08 Oct 2025AY 2014-15
For Appellant: Shri Rajnikant Bhatra, CAFor Respondent: Shri Gautam Singh Choudhary, JCIT-DR (Thru: V.C)
Section 132(1)Section 143(3)Section 153Section 154Section 271(1)Section 271(1)(c)

68,088/- being\ndisallowances out of certain expenses claimed. The assessee firm filed an\nappeal against the said order. Thereafter Ld. A.O. issued a notice u/s 154 dated\n10-7-2017 on the ground that assessee was allowed set off of brought forward\nunabsorbed depreciation of Rs.21,13,949/- of A.Y. 2001-02 & earlier years which\nwas irregular