BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

10 results for “section 68”+ Section 276Cclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi35Mumbai12Jaipur10Chandigarh8Kolkata6Pune6Bangalore4Ahmedabad4SC2Agra1Telangana1Allahabad1Chennai1HARJIT SINGH BEDI CHANDRAMAULI KR. PRASAD1Hyderabad1Jodhpur1Karnataka1Lucknow1Patna1

Key Topics

Section 271(1)(c)18Section 14815Penalty7Deduction6Section 2745Section 139(4)5Section 1475House Property5Addition to Income5Section 271(1)

URMILA RAJENDRA MUNDRA,AJMER vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(2), AJMER, AJMER

In the result grounds raised by the assessee is allowed

ITA 577/JPR/2025[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur01 Aug 2025AY 2022-23

Bench: SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member), SHRI NARINDER KUMAR (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Sh. Sunil Porwal, CAFor Respondent: Sh. Gautam Singh Choudhary, JCIT
Section 250Section 270ASection 270A(1)

68 (Rule 129) which also has been denied by AO since considered such disallowances as “MISREPORTING” enclosed copy of notice u/sec. 270AA dated 02/05/2024 of Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(2), Ajmer. (Page 3 to 4) Under similar circumstances; Hon’ble ITAT in Appeal No. 68/JODH/2024 A.Y. 2017-18 in case of Triupati Jewellers Jodhpur has held; Copy Enclosed. (Page

VIRENDRA SINGH RATNAWAT,JAIPUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, JAIPUR

4
Section 143(3)4
Search & Seizure4

In the result, three appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 179/JPR/2022[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur01 Jan 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Sh. S. R. Sharma (CA) &For Respondent: Sh. Ajay Malik (CIT)
Section 127Section 132Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 153ASection 69A

68 to 69D, also needs to be understood in the same manner, as attempt to evade tax/penalty/ interest etc. Therefore, a conjoint reading of section 115BBE with section 68/69A and explanation to section 276C

VIRENDRA SINGH RATNAWAT,JAIPUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, JAIPUR

In the result, three appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 181/JPR/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur01 Jan 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Sh. S. R. Sharma (CA) &For Respondent: Sh. Ajay Malik (CIT)
Section 127Section 132Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 153ASection 69A

68 to 69D, also needs to be understood in the same manner, as attempt to evade tax/penalty/ interest etc. Therefore, a conjoint reading of section 115BBE with section 68/69A and explanation to section 276C

VIRENDRA SINGH RATNAWAT,JAIPUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, JAIPUR

In the result, three appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 180/JPR/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur01 Jan 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Sh. S. R. Sharma (CA) &For Respondent: Sh. Ajay Malik (CIT)
Section 127Section 132Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 153ASection 69A

68 to 69D, also needs to be understood in the same manner, as attempt to evade tax/penalty/ interest etc. Therefore, a conjoint reading of section 115BBE with section 68/69A and explanation to section 276C

KANHAIYALAL RAMESHWAR DAS,KOTA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3, JAIPUR

ITA 1454/JPR/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur08 Oct 2025AY 2014-15
For Appellant: Shri Rajnikant Bhatra, CAFor Respondent: Shri Gautam Singh Choudhary, JCIT-DR (Thru: V.C)
Section 132(1)Section 143(3)Section 153Section 154Section 271(1)Section 271(1)(c)

68,088/- being\ndisallowances out of certain expenses claimed. The assessee firm filed an\nappeal against the said order. Thereafter Ld. A.O. issued a notice u/s 154 dated\n10-7-2017 on the ground that assessee was allowed set off of brought forward\nunabsorbed depreciation of Rs.21,13,949/- of A.Y. 2001-02 & earlier years which\nwas irregular

AJOY SHARMA,JAIPUR vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR

ITA 547/JPR/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur22 Jul 2024AY 2016-17
For Appellant: Sh. Mahendra Gargieya, Adv. &For Respondent: Smt. Monisha Choudhary, Addl. CIT
Section 139(4)Section 147Section 148Section 271(1)(c)Section 274

68 was one which was surrendered by Assessee itself-\nBoth the authorities below had recorded finding that there was neither any\ndetection nor any information in the possession of Department except for the\namount surrendered by Assessee and in these circumstances it cannot be said\nthat there was any concealment-This is a finding of fact There is no illegality

AJOY SHARMA ,JAIPUR vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR

ITA 546/JPR/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur22 Jul 2024AY 2015-16
For Appellant: Sh. Mahendra Gargieya, Adv. &For Respondent: Smt. Monisha Choudhary, Addl. CIT
Section 139(4)Section 147Section 148Section 271(1)(c)Section 274

68 was one which was surrendered by Assessee itself-\nBoth the authorities below had recorded finding that there was neither any\ndetection nor any information in the possession of Department except for the\namount surrendered by Assessee and in these circumstances it cannot be said\nthat there was any concealment-This is a finding of fact There is no illegality

AJOY SHARMA ,JAIPUR vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR

ITA 543/JPR/2024[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur22 Jul 2024AY 2012-13
For Appellant: Sh. Mahendra Gargieya, Adv. &For Respondent: Smt. Monisha Choudhary, Addl. CIT
Section 139(4)Section 147Section 148Section 271(1)(c)Section 274Section 80C

68 was one which was surrendered by Assessee itself-\nBoth the authorities below had recorded finding that there was neither any\ndetection nor any information in the possession of Department except for the\namount surrendered by Assessee and in these circumstances it cannot be said\nthat there was any concealment-This is a finding of fact There is no illegality

AJOY SHARMA ,JAIPUR vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR

ITA 544/JPR/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur22 Jul 2024AY 2013-14
For Appellant: Sh. Mahendra Gargieya, Adv. &For Respondent: Smt. Monisha Choudhary, Addl. CIT
Section 139(4)Section 147Section 148Section 271(1)(c)Section 274

68 was one which was surrendered by Assessee itself-\nBoth the authorities below had recorded finding that there was neither any\ndetection nor any information in the possession of Department except for the\namount surrendered by Assessee and in these circumstances it cannot be said\nthat there was any concealment-This is a finding of fact There is no illegality

AJOY SHARMA ,JAIPUR vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR

ITA 545/JPR/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur22 Jul 2024AY 2014-15
For Appellant: Sh. Mahendra Gargieya, Adv. &For Respondent: Smt. Monisha Choudhary, Addl. CIT
Section 139(4)Section 147Section 148Section 271(1)(c)Section 274

68 was one which was surrendered by Assessee itself-\nBoth the authorities below had recorded finding that there was neither any\ndetection nor any information in the possession of Department except for the\namount surrendered by Assessee and in these circumstances it cannot be said\nthat there was any concealment-This is a finding of fact There is no illegality