URBAN IMPROVEMENT TRUST,CAD CIRCLE vs. NATIONAL FACELESS APPEALS CENTRE, DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

68 lakhs. 4. The Assessing Officer issued show cause notice u/s 271B of the Act to the assessee for the default of not getting its accounts audited and has violated of the provisions of section 44AB of the IT Act 1961. 5. Being aggrieved by the assessment order, the assessee preferred an appeal before the ld. CIT(E). Before

URBAN IMPROVEMENT TRUST,NEAR CAD CIRCLE vs. NATIONAL FACELESS APPEALS CENTRE, DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

68 lakhs. 4. The Assessing Officer issued show cause notice u/s 271B of the Act to the assessee for the default of not getting its accounts audited and has violated of the provisions of section 44AB of the IT Act 1961. 5. Being aggrieved by the assessment order, the assessee preferred an appeal before the ld. CIT(E). Before

URBAN IMPROVEMENT TRUST,NEAR CAD CIRCLE vs. NATIONAL FACELESS APPEALS CENTRE, DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

68 lakhs. 4. The Assessing Officer issued show cause notice u/s 271B of the Act to the assessee for the default of not getting its accounts audited and has violated of the provisions of section 44AB of the IT Act 1961. 5. Being aggrieved by the assessment order, the assessee preferred an appeal before the ld. CIT(E). Before

URBAN IMPROVEMENT TRUST,NEAR CAD CIRCLE vs. NATIONAL FACELESS APPEALS CENTRE, DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

68 lakhs. 4. The Assessing Officer issued show cause notice u/s 271B of the Act to the assessee for the default of not getting its accounts audited and has violated of the provisions of section 44AB of the IT Act 1961. 5. Being aggrieved by the assessment order, the assessee preferred an appeal before the ld. CIT(E). Before

URBAN IMPROVEMENT TRUST,NEAR CAD CIRCLE vs. NATIONAL FACELESS APPEALS CENTRE, DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

68 lakhs. 4. The Assessing Officer issued show cause notice u/s 271B of the Act to the assessee for the default of not getting its accounts audited and has violated of the provisions of section 44AB of the IT Act 1961. 5. Being aggrieved by the assessment order, the assessee preferred an appeal before the ld. CIT(E). Before

URBAN IMPROVEMENT TRUST,CAD CIRCLE vs. NATIONAL FACELESS APPEALS CENTRE, DELHI, DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

68 lakhs. 4. The Assessing Officer issued show cause notice u/s 271B of the Act to the assessee for the default of not getting its accounts audited and has violated of the provisions of section 44AB of the IT Act 1961. 5. Being aggrieved by the assessment order, the assessee preferred an appeal before the ld. CIT(E). Before

ISYS SOFTECH PRIVATE LIMITED,JAIPUR vs. CIT (A), JAIPUR, JAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

273B (P.B. pages 131 to 142). (3) Hathway C. Net (P) Ltd. Vs. TRO (2018) 192 TTJ (Mumb 'F') 497 : Assessee in default- limitation for passing order under section 201(1) / 201 * (1A) . Show- cause notice having been issued on 23rd September 2003. Order passed u/s. 201(1) / 201 * (1A) on 28th March 2011 was barred by limitation

KANHIAYA LAL SAIN,JAIPUR vs. JCIT RANGE-7 JAIPUR, JAIPUR

In the result, the Appeals of the appellant stands allowed with no orders as to costs

Bench: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (Judicial Member)

68—Transaction was carried out with father of assessee—Provision of s. 269SS was brought under statue to discourage assessee to justify their unaccounted money—However, in case on hand, there was no allegation that assessee had introduced unaccounted money in his business—Thus, keeping in view object of provision of s. 269SS, cash transaction which was genuine could

SHRI SOHAN NATH,AJMER vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, AJMER

Bench: The Date Of Hearing.”

68,944/-. The penalty so imposed by the AO and confirmed by the ld. CIT(A) being totally contrary to the provisions of law and facts kindly be deleted in full. 4. The appellant prays your honour indulgences to add, amend or alter of or any other grounds of the appeal on or before the date of hearing