Search: section 68

4 results for “section 68”+ Section 271Cclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi28 Karnataka21 Mumbai18 Ahmedabad12 Chennai12 Cochin11 Kolkata6 Jaipur4 Hyderabad4 Bangalore2 Indore2 Lucknow2 Nagpur1 Pune1 SC1 Surat1 Varanasi1

Key Topics

Section 271B14 Section 271C6 Section 44A4 Penalty4 Section 1543 Section 143(3)3 Deduction3 Section 234A2 Section 195(1)2 Limitation/Time-bar

MANPHOOL SINGH,JAIPUR vs. ITO WARD 6(2), JAIPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 748/JPR/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur07 Feb 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: The Appeal Hearing.”

For Appellant: Sh. Dev Arora (CA)For Respondent: Sh. Monisha Choudhary (Addl.CIT)

Section 143(2)Section 271B

68[or section 44BB orsection 44BBB], as the case may be, and the assessee has claimed his income to be lower than the profits or gains so deemed to be the profits and gains of his business, as the case may be, during such 69 [previous year,] ] The following clause (iv) shall be inserted after clause

ISYS SOFTECH PRIVATE LIMITED,JAIPUR vs. CIT (A), JAIPUR, JAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

MANPHOOL SINGH,JAIPUR vs. ITO WARD 6(2), JAIPUR

ISYS SOFTECH PRIVATE LIMITED,JAIPUR vs. CIT (A), JAIPUR, JAIPUR

MANPHOOL SINGH,JAIPUR vs. ITO WARD 6(2), JAIPUR

ISYS SOFTECH PRIVATE LIMITED,JAIPUR vs. CIT (A), JAIPUR, JAIPUR

SHRI VIKRAM SINGH SHEKHAWAT,JAIPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE, SIKAR

SHRI SOHAN NATH,AJMER vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, AJMER