BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “section 68”+ Section 148Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi13Hyderabad12Chandigarh9Kolkata6Lucknow4Bangalore3Jaipur2Pune2Mumbai1Rajkot1

Key Topics

Section 26314Section 148B4Section 143(3)4Section 69A4Section 1154Addition to Income2Revision u/s 2632

ARUN PALAWAT,JAIPUR vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, (CENTRAL),, JAIPUR

The appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 599/JPR/2025[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur15 Sept 2025AY 2021-22

Bench: DR. MITHA LAL MEENA (Accountant Member), DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri S.R. Sharma, C.A. &For Respondent: Shri Rajesh Ojha, CIT-DR a
Section 115Section 143(3)Section 148BSection 263Section 69A

148B of the IT Act, 1961 at a total loss of (-) Rs. 2,95,46,110/- after making an addition of Rs. 33,90,001/- to the declared income/loss. The details of the above said addition has been given and comprehensively explained in the assessment order. Upon examination of the assessment records, the ld. PCIT (Central), Jaipur opined that

ZARI SILK (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED,JAIPUR vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL), JAIPUR , JAIPUR

The appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 600/JPR/2025[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur15 Sept 2025AY 2021-22

Bench: DR. MITHA LAL MEENA (Accountant Member), DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri S.R. Sharma, C.A. &For Respondent: Shri Rajesh Ojha, CIT-DR a
Section 115Section 143(3)Section 148BSection 263Section 69A

148B of the IT Act, 1961 at a total loss of (-) Rs. 2,95,46,110/- after making an addition of Rs. 33,90,001/- to the declared income/loss. The details of the above said addition has been given and comprehensively explained in the assessment order. Upon examination of the assessment records, the ld. PCIT (Central), Jaipur opined that