BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

8 results for “section 68”+ Section 11A(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai38Delhi28Bangalore14SC13Ahmedabad13Lucknow11Kolkata8Chandigarh8Jaipur8Karnataka7Cochin7Indore6Nagpur4Visakhapatnam2Calcutta2Hyderabad2Telangana2A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1Andhra Pradesh1

Key Topics

Section 142(1)8Section 143(1)6Section 43B6Section 115B5Addition to Income5Disallowance5Section 1324Section 143(2)4Section 2504Section 132(4)

AHLUWALIA ERECTORS & FABRICATORS PRIVATE LIMITED, KOTA,KOTA vs. DCIT/ACIT CIR-2, KOTA, KOTA

In the result the appeal of\nthe assessee in ITA no 199/JP/2025 is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 198/JPR/2025[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur12 Nov 2025AY 2021-22
For Appellant: Shri Mahendra Gargieya, AdvFor Respondent: Mrs. Anita Rinesh, JCIT
Section 143(1)Section 234ASection 250Section 43B

11a to 11g) in schedule Ol.”\nThe appellant aggrieved with the disallowance made by the AO CPC, filed appeal\nwhich was decided on 30.07.2022 with the following remarks by the CIT(A),\nNFAC, New Delhi: -\n“5.3 Ground No 2: Disallowance under Section 43B of the Act: The appellant has\nclaimed that an amount of Rs. Rs 1

AHLUWALIA ERECTORS & FABRICATORS PRIVATE LIMITED,KOTA vs. DCIT/ACIT CIR-2, KOTA

4
Undisclosed Income3
Natural Justice3

In the result the appeal of\nthe assessee in ITA no 199/JP/2025 is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 197/JPR/2025[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur12 Nov 2025AY 2019-20
For Appellant: Shri Mahendra Gargieya, AdvFor Respondent: Mrs. Anita Rinesh, JCIT
Section 143(1)Section 234ASection 250Section 43B

11a to 11g) in schedule Ol.”\nThe appellant aggrieved with the disallowance made by the AO CPC, filed appeal\nwhich was decided on 30.07.2022 with the following remarks by the CIT(A),\nNFAC, New Delhi: -\n“5.3 Ground No 2: Disallowance under Section 43B of the Act: The appellant has\nclaimed that an amount of Rs. Rs 1

AHLUWALIA ERECTORS & FABRICATORS PRIVATE LIMITED, KOTA,KOTA vs. DCIT/ACIT CIR-2, KOTA

In the result the appeal of\nthe assessee in ITA no 199/JP/2025 is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 199/JPR/2025[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur12 Nov 2025AY 2022-23
For Appellant: Shri Mahendra Gargieya, AdvFor Respondent: Mrs. Anita Rinesh, JCIT
Section 143(1)Section 234ASection 250Section 43B

11a to 11g) in schedule Ol.”\nThe appellant aggrieved with the disallowance made by the AO CPC, filed appeal\nwhich was decided on 30.07.2022 with the following remarks by the CIT(A),\nNFAC, New Delhi: -\n“5.3 Ground No 2: Disallowance under Section 43B of the Act: The appellant has\nclaimed that an amount of Rs. Rs 1

SHANKAR JHALANI,JAIPUR vs. ITO, JAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 1053/JPR/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur19 Feb 2018AY 2011-12

Bench: The Itat By Taking Following

For Appellant: Shri P.C. Parwal (CA)For Respondent: Shri R.A. Verma (Addl.CIT)
Section 144Section 40

section 40(a)(ia) inserted w.e.f. 01.04.2013 has retrospective effect as held by Delhi High Court in case of CIT Vs. Ansal Land Mark Township Pvt. Ltd. 124 DTR 185, Bangalore Bench in case of Sh. G. Shankar Vs. ACIT in ITA No.l832/Bang/2013 dt. 10.10.2014, Agra Bench in case of Rajeev Kumar Agarwal Vs. ACIT (2014) 34 ITR(Trib

SH. MADAN LAL GUPTA,KESHAV NAGAR, ALWAR vs. ADDL. CIT, CENTRAL RANGE, JAIPUR, JAIPUR

In the result appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 580/JPR/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur09 Feb 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri P.C. Parwal (C.A.)For Respondent: Shri Anoop Singh (Addl. CIT) a
Section 115BSection 132Section 132(4)Section 139Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 271D

68,399/- Thus, the cash found in search almost tally with the cash as per books of accounts. The assessee in his statement has surrendered Rs.3,00,000/- out of the cash found from him. The surrender was made erroneously without looking to the actual position in books of accounts. The AO has not found any defect in the cash

SH. MADAN LAL GUPTA,KESHAV NAGAR, ALWAR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, ALWAR, ALWAR

In the result appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 579/JPR/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur09 Feb 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri P.C. Parwal (C.A.)For Respondent: Shri Anoop Singh (Addl. CIT) a
Section 115BSection 132Section 132(4)Section 139Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 271D

68,399/- Thus, the cash found in search almost tally with the cash as per books of accounts. The assessee in his statement has surrendered Rs.3,00,000/- out of the cash found from him. The surrender was made erroneously without looking to the actual position in books of accounts. The AO has not found any defect in the cash

MOTHERS EDUCATION HUB,JAIPUR vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 618/JPR/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur30 Nov 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: HON’BLE SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JM & HON’BLE SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri P.C. Parwal, CAFor Respondent: Shri A.S. Nehra, Addl.CIT
Section 115BSection 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 250Section 4Section 40A(2)(b)Section 68

section 40A(2)(b) the onus was on the AO to brought on record any material to establish that the salary so paid by the assessee is excessive, but even inspite of specific provision, the AO has not brought any material on record to establish that the salary so paid was excessive. Further, the ld. D/R vehemently argued that

VIVEKANDA SHIKSHA SAMITI,PALWAS ROAD, SIKAR vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, JAIPUR, JAIPUR

In the result, both appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 203/JPR/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur05 Jul 2024AY 2017-18
For Appellant: Sh. P. C. Parwal (CA)For Respondent: Sh. Anil Dhaka (CIT)
Section 115BSection 127Section 132Section 133ASection 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 153CSection 69

68,95,000/- in her bank account during the year under consideration. It has been submitted that the assessee has sold a property, transferred in her name after the death of her husband, for a consideration of Rs 1,31,45,200/- during the financial year 2015-16 and the sale consideration has been received in installments during the financial