BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “reassessment u/s 147”+ Section 801A(4)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi29Mumbai23Hyderabad23Indore15Chennai9Ahmedabad7Patna6Kolkata5Rajkot4Bangalore4Jaipur4Lucknow3Nagpur2Raipur1Jodhpur1

Key Topics

Section 1475Section 1485Section 143(3)4Section 80I3Addition to Income3Deduction2

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , JAIPUR vs. BHARAT SPUN PIPE AND CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, JAIPUR

In the result the appeal of the revenue in ITA no

ITA 360/JPR/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur06 Aug 2025AY 2017-18
For Appellant: Shri Tarun Mittal, C.AFor Respondent: Ms. Alka Gautam, (CIT) (V.C.)
Section 144BSection 147Section 148Section 153C

4) of the\nDTAA. Once the aforesaid explanation was proffered, the AO then proceeded to\nhold that the petitioner was not entitled to treaty benefits, a charge which was not\neven laid in the original SCN or which could be said to have constituted the basis\nfor the formation of opinion that reassessment was warranted. In fact the petitioner\nwas

M/S RAJASTHAN STATE ROAD DEVELOPMENT & CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION LTD.,SETU BHAWAN, JHALANA DOONGRI, JAIPUR vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-6, JAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 150/JPR/2023[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur28 Jun 2023AY 2010-11

Bench: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Sh. P. C. Parwal (CA)For Respondent: Sh. A. S. Nehara (Addl. CIT)
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 80Section 801ASection 801A(4)Section 80I

section 147 of the IT Act, 1961 for the AY 2010-11. The escapement was on account of failure on the part of the assessee to disclose all material facts.” The assessee objected to the notice issued u/s 148 vide reply dt. 12.10.2017 (PB 21-24). 4. The AO, however, without disposing the objections raised by the assessee completed

PINK CITY JEWEL HOUSE PRIVATE LIMITED ,JAIPUR vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL), JAIPUR

ITA 598/JPR/2024[2018-2019]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur26 Dec 2024AY 2018-2019
For Appellant: Sh. Siddharth Ranka, AdvFor Respondent: \nSh. Saurav Harsh, Adv.&
Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 144oSection 14ASection 263Section 69

801A(8) r.w.s. 10AA of the Income\nTax Act, 1961. The issue for consideration is as to what is the quantum by which\ndeduction claimed u/s 10 AA by the SEZ Unit is to be reduced. The turnover, gross\nprofit/gross profit rate, net profit and net profit rate disclosed by both SEZ Unit and\nDomestic Unit are as follows :-\nUnit

AKSH OPTIFIBRE LIMITED,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CIRCLE - 2, ALWAR

In the result, all the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 170/JPR/2024[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur20 May 2025AY 2010-11
For Appellant: Shri Akul Agarwal, C.A. (thr. V.C.)For Respondent: Shri Arvind Kumar, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 156Section 234ASection 250

147 read with 143(3) vide order dated 21.03.2016 vis null\nand void.\n4.1\nFurther the Notice issued u/s 148 do not strike off the irrelevant column, that\nis whether present case is assessment or reassessment and the notice is plainly\nmechanical and stereotype. That the reasons were supplied by the Assessing\nOfficer to assessee on 03.07.2015 which were objected