DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. PRIYA DEWAN, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

u/s 153A cannot be sustained\nand is hereby deleted as the same is without basis of incriminating material\nunearthed during the search action on the appellant and impugned addition could\nhave been done by the learned assessing officer in re-assessment proceedings by\nissuance of notice under section 147/148. The Id. AO is directed to take necessary\naction in this

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. VIPUL BANKA, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

u/s 153A cannot be sustained\nand is hereby deleted as the same is without basis of incriminating material\nunearthed during the search action on the appellant and impugned addition could\nhave been done by the learned assessing officer in re-assessment proceedings by\nissuance of notice under section 147/148. The Id. AO is directed to take necessary\naction in this

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. SARITA DEWAN, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

u/s 153A cannot be sustained\nand is hereby deleted as the same is without basis of incriminating material\nunearthed during the search action on the appellant and impugned addition could\nhave been done by the learned assessing officer in re-assessment proceedings by\nissuance of notice under section 147/148. The Id. AO is directed to take necessary\naction in this

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. SNEHLATA AGARWAL, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

u/s 153A cannot be sustained\nand is hereby deleted as the same is without basis of incriminating material\nunearthed during the search action on the appellant and impugned addition could\nhave been done by the learned assessing officer in re-assessment proceedings by\nissuance of notice under section 147/148. The Id. AO is directed to take necessary\naction in this

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR , JAIPUR vs. USHA BANKA, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

u/s 153A cannot be\nsustained and is hereby deleted as the same is without basis of incriminating\nmaterial unearthed during the search action on the appellant and impugned addition could\nhave been done by the learned assessing officer in re-assessment proceedings by\nissuance of notice under section 147/148. The Id. AO is directed to take necessary\naction in this

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. SUBHASH CHANDRA BANKA, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

u/s 153A cannot be sustained\nand is hereby deleted as the same is without basis of incriminating material\nunearthed during the search action on the appellant and impugned addition could\nhave been done by the learned assessing officer in re-assessment proceedings by\nissuance of notice under section 147/148. The Id. AO is directed to take necessary\naction in this

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. USHA BANKA, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

u/s 153A cannot be sustained\nand is hereby deleted as the same is without basis of incriminating material\nunearthed during the search action on the appellant and impugned addition could\nhave been done by the learned assessing officer in re-assessment proceedings by\nissuance of notice under section 147/148. The Id. AO is directed to take necessary\naction in this

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. SARITA DEWAN, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

u/s 153A cannot be sustained\nand is hereby deleted as the same is without basis of incriminating material\nunearthed during the search action on the appellant and impugned addition could\nhave been done by the learned assessing officer in re-assessment proceedings by\nissuance of notice under section 147/148. The Id. AO is directed to take necessary\naction in this

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. PRIYA DEWAN, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

u/s 153A cannot be sustained\nand is hereby deleted as the same is without basis of incriminating material\nunearthed during the search action on the appellant and impugned addition could\nhave been done by the learned assessing officer in re-assessment proceedings by\nissuance of notice under section 147/148. The Id. AO is directed to take necessary\naction in this

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. ANIMESH AGARWAL, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

u/s 153A cannot be sustained\nand is hereby deleted as the same is without basis of incriminating material\nunearthed during the search action on the appellant and impugned addition could\nhave been done by the learned assessing officer in re-assessment proceedings by\nissuance of notice under section 147/148. The Id. AO is directed to take necessary\naction in this

SH. HARI PRAKASH GUPTA,JAIPUR vs. ITO, WARD-1(2), JAIPUR, JAIPUR

The appeal stands allowed

Bench: SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member), SHRI NARINDER KUMAR (Judicial Member)

u/s 148 was not served by the AO who passed the order and consequential by the order of assessment lacks jurisdiction. Ld. DR has not disputed the primary facts Ld. AR has relied upon the decision of our Hon’ble High Court in Sh. Hari Prakash Gupta vs. ITO the case of Mrs. ShubhashriPanickerVs. CIT (2018) 166 DTR 1

SH. HARI PRAKASH GUPTA,JAIPUR vs. ITO, WARD-1(2), JAIPUR, JAIPUR

The appeal stands allowed

u/s 148 was not served by the AO who passed the order and consequential by the order of assessment lacks jurisdiction. Ld. DR has not disputed the primary facts Ld. AR has relied upon the decision of our Hon'ble High Court in the case of Mrs. ShubhashriPanickerVs. CIT (2018) 166 DTR 1 (Raj.) (HC) wherein it was held; 1

INCOME TAX OFFICER , SIKAR vs. BHASKAR CHAUHAN, JAIPUR

In the result the appeal of the revenue in ITA no

Bench: Him.

reassessment under Sections 139,147,148,149,151 & 153. " In view of the above discussion, the assessment completed u/s 144 deserves to be quashed. The order of the Learned CIT(A) also deserved to be quashed on this ground. Additional Ground No.2 On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Learned

LATE SHRI JITENDRA NAGAR THROUGH HIS L/R SMT. DEEPIKA NAGAR,BARAN vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD BARAN, BARAN

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: The Date Of Hearing.”

147 r.w.s. 144B of the Act, dated 29.04.2013 in absence of a valid notice issued u/s. 148 of the Act cannot be sustained and, is quashed. 25. As we have quashed the assessment for want of valid assumption of jurisdiction by the A.O, therefore, we refrain from adverting to and dealing with the other contentions, based on which, the impugned

WHOLE SALE CLOTH MERCHANT ASSOCIATION ,KOTA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE KOTA , KOTA

72,919/- has escaped assessment for the A.Y. 2014-15 and the services rendered by the assessee also required verification. Statutory notice u/s 142(1) was also issued for 1TR filing on 11.09.2017 but no return was filed by the assessee. Therefore, notice u/s148 of the Act was issued. In response to the notice u/s 148 the assessee filed

ACIT, KOTA vs. MANGALAM CEMENT LTD., KOTA

147 cannot be held valid in law and is liable to be quashed. ACIT, Circle-1, Kota vs. M/s Mangalam Cement Ltd. Kota 12.6 Further, on review of the queries raised by the AO, it transpires that the same were related to examination of purchase of the assets during the year, the date on which they were first

AJAY BAKLIWAL,KOTA vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, KOTA, KOTA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

147, section 148, section 149, section 151 and section 153, in the case of a person 5 Ajay Bakliwal vs. ACIT where a search is initiated under section 132 or books of account, other documents or any assets are requisitioned under section 132A after the 31st day of May, 2003 [but on or before the 31st day of March

SAVITA GUPTA,KOTA vs. ITO, DELHI

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member)

u/s 147 has been spelt out by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in GKN Driveshafts (India) Limited v. Income Tax Officer and Others: (2003) 1 SCC 72 (259 ITR 19), wherein the Supreme Court directed as under: “However, we clarify that when a notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act is issued, the proper course of action