BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “reassessment u/s 147”+ Section 53Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Bangalore43Delhi30Mumbai21Kolkata8Patna7Hyderabad5Chandigarh5Visakhapatnam4Raipur4Chennai3Lucknow3Jaipur2Ahmedabad1Surat1Indore1

Key Topics

Section 1472Section 1482Section 35(1)(ii)2Reassessment2Addition to Income2Natural Justice2

MAHENDRA SINGH,SIKAR vs. ITO WARD NEEM KA THANA, NEEM KA THANA

ITA 440/JPR/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur10 Sept 2024AY 2013-14
For Appellant: Shri Vedant Agarwal (Adv.)For Respondent: Shri Arvind Kumar (CIT)
Section 144Section 147Section 149(1)(b)Section 2(47)(v)Section 53A

147 of the\nIncome Tax Act, 1961.\n5. On the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, Assessing Officer\ngrossly erred in passing the ex-parte Assessment Order by unlawfully invoking\nthe provision of section 144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.\n6. On the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, Assessing Officer\ngrossly erred

RASHLEELA ENTERPRISES PRIVATE LIMITED, JAIPUR,JAIPUR vs. ACIT CEN CIR 3, JAIPUR, JAIPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1/JPR/2025[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur25 Mar 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Dr. S. Seethalakshmi & Shri Gagan Goyalrashleela Enterprises Pvt. Ltd., C-5, Krishna Balram, Calgiri Road, Malviya Nagar, Jaipur 302017. Pan No.: Aadcr2594J ...... Appellant Vs.

For Appellant: Mr. Rajeev Sogani, CA, Ld. AR &For Respondent: Mrs. Anita Rinesh, JCIT- Ld. DR
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 151Section 250Section 35Section 35(1)Section 35(1)(ii)

147 of Income Tax Act, 1961 ("ITA"). The action of the Ld. CIT (A) is illegal, unjustified, arbitrary and against the facts of the case. Relief may please be granted by quashing the reassessment proceedings being illegal and without any basis. 2. In the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, Ld. CIT (A) has erred in confirming