BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “reassessment u/s 147”+ Section 53Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Bangalore41Delhi27Mumbai21Chandigarh15Hyderabad9Indore8Kolkata8Patna7Ahmedabad6Visakhapatnam4Raipur4Chennai3Lucknow3Jaipur2Surat1

Key Topics

Section 14814Section 1473Section 1443Section 142(1)2Section 35(1)(ii)2Reassessment2

RAM NARAYAN,KOTA vs. ITO, KOTA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 428/JPR/2014[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur27 Jun 2019AY 2008-09
For Appellant: Shri Naresh Gupta (Advocate)For Respondent: Shri Jai Singh (Addl. CIT)
Section 142(1)Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 282

reassessment made under section 147 of the Act. The AO has given the details of various notices issued to the assessee at page 2 of the impugned order as under :- Sr. Notice/Letter dated Mode of service Compliance No. 1. 29.12.2009 Notice u/s 148 By hand Non-compliance 2. 13.07.2010 Notice u/s 142(1) By hand to Anju Non-compliance (Grand

RASHLEELA ENTERPRISES PRIVATE LIMITED, JAIPUR,JAIPUR vs. ACIT CEN CIR 3, JAIPUR, JAIPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1/JPR/2025[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur25 Mar 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Dr. S. Seethalakshmi & Shri Gagan Goyalrashleela Enterprises Pvt. Ltd., C-5, Krishna Balram, Calgiri Road, Malviya Nagar, Jaipur 302017. Pan No.: Aadcr2594J ...... Appellant Vs.

For Appellant: Mr. Rajeev Sogani, CA, Ld. AR &For Respondent: Mrs. Anita Rinesh, JCIT- Ld. DR
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 151Section 250Section 35Section 35(1)Section 35(1)(ii)

147 of Income Tax Act, 1961 ("ITA"). The action of the Ld. CIT (A) is illegal, unjustified, arbitrary and against the facts of the case. Relief may please be granted by quashing the reassessment proceedings being illegal and without any basis. 2. In the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, Ld. CIT (A) has erred in confirming