DAYARAM YADAV,JAIPUR vs. CIT(A), NFAC

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

reassessment proceedings going on. On the very next day, he visited the office of the 13 Sh. Dayaram Yadav, Jaipur vs. ITO AO and explained him the reasons for non compliance of notices being the sending of all earlier notices on the incorrect addresses, where upon he was informed that assessment in his case has been completed. Still

ISYS SOFTECH PRIVATE LIMITED,JAIPUR vs. CIT (A), JAIPUR, JAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

reassessment are under sec. 147 and 148 of the Act and they are on a completely different footing and, therefore, do not merit consideration for the purpose of this case. 19. Even though the period of three years would be a reasonable period as prescribed under section 153 of the Act for completion of proceedings, we have been told that

GIRDHAR GOPAL LAHOTI,JAIPUR vs. ITO, KISHANGARH

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

reassessment order passed u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 8 Shri Girdhar Gopal Lahoti vs. ITO 147 of the Act the AO made a total addition of Rs. 22,45,222/- on account of three issues. The ld. CIT(A) has granted relief to the assessee in respect of the addition made u/s 69A of the Act by restricting the same

SHRI SANJAY PARAKH,JODHPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, ALWAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

147 r.w.s. 143(3) of the Act vide order dated 19.12.2017 wherein income of Rs. 2,03,603/- was brought to tax. Separately, penalty proceeding U/s 271A for non- maintenance of books of accounts, U/s 271B of the Act for not getting the books of account audited and U/s 271(1)(b) for non compliance to the notice U/s

SHRI SANJAY PARAKH,JODHPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, ALWAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

147 r.w.s. 143(3) of the Act vide order dated 19.12.2017 wherein income of Rs. 2,03,603/- was brought to tax. Separately, penalty proceeding U/s 271A for non- maintenance of books of accounts, U/s 271B of the Act for not getting the books of account audited and U/s 271(1)(b) for non compliance to the notice U/s

SHRI SANJAY PARAKH,JODHPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, ALWAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

147 r.w.s. 143(3) of the Act vide order dated 19.12.2017 wherein income of Rs. 2,03,603/- was brought to tax. Separately, penalty proceeding U/s 271A for non- maintenance of books of accounts, U/s 271B of the Act for not getting the books of account audited and U/s 271(1)(b) for non compliance to the notice U/s