BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “reassessment u/s 147”+ Section 194Hclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai30Delhi19Bangalore10Jaipur4Indore1Hyderabad1Jodhpur1Lucknow1Cochin1Patna1

Key Topics

Section 26310Section 1479Section 1489Section 271(1)(b)6Section 1445Section 142(1)3Reassessment3Addition to Income3Section 69

SHIV VEGPRO PRIVATE LIMITED ,KOTA vs. PCIT-UDAIPUR , UDAIPUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 1014/JPR/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur28 Jan 2025AY 2017-18
For Appellant: Shri Mahendra Gargieya, (Adv.) &For Respondent: Mrs. Alka Gautam, (CIT-DR)
Section 147Section 263Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

u/s 147 was initiated\nhence, such issues are beyond the scope of 263 and therefore, the\nproceedings may kindly be dropped.\n3. Supporting Case Laws:\n3.1In case of CIT vs. Alagendran Finance Ltd, (2007) 211 CTR (SC) 69,\nthe Hon'ble Supreme Court, while dealing with more or less an identical\nissue of revisionary power exercised under s.263

APOORVA SHARMA,JAIPUR vs. ITO, WARD-6(4), JAIPUR

2
Section 194H2
Unexplained Investment2
Penalty2
ITA 219/JPR/2020[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur06 Oct 2021AY 2010-11
For Appellant: Sh. Vinod Kumar Gupta (CA) &For Respondent: Smt. Monisha Choudhary (JCIT)
Section 11Section 142(1)Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 64

147 and For obtaining the Approval of the Addl. Commissioner of Income Tax, Range-23, New Delhi, a copy thereof is placed at page no. 1 of the Paper Book, and therefore, the legal issue in dispute is squarely covered by the aforesaid finding of the Tribunal, hence, respectfully following the aforesaid precedent i.e. ITAT, SMC, Bench, New Delhi decision

SUNRISE REALCONSULTANCY PRIVATE LIMITED ,ALWAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-BHIWADI, BHIWADI

In the result, the both the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 1307/JPR/2024[2013-24]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur08 May 2025AY 2013-24

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Sh. S. L. Poddar, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Gautam Singh Choudhary, Addl. CIT
Section 142(1)Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 194HSection 271(1)(b)Section 69

194H of the I.T. Act. Based on this information, the case was reopened under Section 147 with the approval of the Pr. CIT to reassess escaped income. A notice under Section 148 was issued on 08/05/2020, but the company did not file its return in response. Subsequently, notices under Section 142(1) were issued on 01/02/2021, 05/10/2021, and 09/12/2021, asking

SUNRISE REALCONSULTANCY PRIVATE LIMITED ,BHIWADI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-BHIWADI, BHIWADI

ITA 1308/JPR/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur08 May 2025AY 2013-14
For Appellant: Sh. S. L. Poddar, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Gautam Singh Choudhary, Addl. CIT
Section 142(1)Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 194HSection 271(1)(b)Section 69

147 of the IT Act, 1961 with prior approval\nof Ld. Pr.CIT for reassessment of escaped income. Notice u/s 148 of the\nAct was issued on 08/05/2020 and duly served on the assessee to file\nreturn of income. In response to notice U/s 148 of the assessee company\ndid not file its return of income. Subsequently on 25/01/2021, the case