Search: reassessment

3 results for “reassessment”+ Section 92C(3)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai55 Delhi40 Bangalore29 Ahmedabad18 Hyderabad13 Kolkata9 Chennai8 Pune6 Karnataka5 Jaipur3 Panaji1 Calcutta1 SC1 Surat1

Key Topics

Section 92C6 Transfer Pricing3 Addition to Income3 Section 271(1)(c)2 Section 143(3)2 Section 144C2 Penalty2 Comparables/TP2 TP Method2

DCIT, JAIPUR vs. JAIPUR RUGS COMPANY (P) LTD., JAIPUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed and appeal filed by the Revenue stands dismissed

ITA 1084/JPR/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur23 Apr 2018AY 2011-12

For Appellant: Shri Rajeev Sogani (CA)For Respondent: Smt. Seema Meena (JCIT) fu/kZkfjrh dh vksj ls@

Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 144CSection 92CSection 92C(2)

92C(2) is not applicable in the instance case, as the AO has applied CUP method for determining ALP.” ITA. No. 46/JP/2017: “1. In the facts and circumstances of the case and in law the ld. CIT has erred in not appreciating the fact that ld. AO/TPO has not provided DCIT, Jaipur vs. M/s Jaipur Rugs Company (P) Ltd., Jaipur

DCIT, JAIPUR vs. JAIPUR RUGS COMPANY (P) LTD., JAIPUR

DCIT, JAIPUR vs. JAIPUR RUGS COMPANY (P) LTD., JAIPUR

VAIBHAV GLOBAL LIMITED,JAIPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-5, JAIPUR

VAIBHAV GLOBAL LIMITED,JAIPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-5, JAIPUR