BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “reassessment”+ Section 92Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai45Delhi22Ahmedabad16Bangalore11Chennai8Kolkata7Hyderabad5Jaipur2Karnataka2Calcutta1

Key Topics

Section 271(1)(c)2Section 92C2Section 143(3)2Transfer Pricing2Penalty2Addition to Income2Comparables/TP2TP Method2

VAIBHAV GLOBAL LIMITED,JAIPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-5, JAIPUR

In the result, the penalty is directed to be deleted and appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 730/JPR/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur19 Dec 2018AY 2009-10
For Appellant: Shri Vijay Mehta (C.A.) &For Respondent: Smt. Roli Agarwal (CIT)
Section 143(3)Section 271(1)(c)Section 92C

92B, it is clear that lending or borrowing of money between two associated enterprises comes within the admit of international transaction and whether the same is at arm’s length has to be considered. Further, the adjustment made by the AO was confirmed at various levels i.e. DRP, ITAT and even the Hon’ble High Court with slight variation

VAIBHAV GLOBAL LIMITED,JAIPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-5, JAIPUR

In the result, the penalty is directed to be deleted and appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 731/JPR/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur19 Dec 2018AY 2010-11
For Appellant: Shri Vijay Mehta (C.A.) &For Respondent: Smt. Roli Agarwal (CIT)
Section 143(3)Section 271(1)(c)Section 92C

92B, it is clear that lending or borrowing of money between two associated enterprises comes within the admit of international transaction and whether the same is at arm’s length has to be considered. Further, the adjustment made by the AO was confirmed at various levels i.e. DRP, ITAT and even the Hon’ble High Court with slight variation