ARYA SAMAJ MANDIR ,BHILWARA vs. CIT(E), JAIPUR

Bench: The Date Of Hearing.”

iii).  Religious expenses are more than 5%, thus violation of section 80G(5B). 4. Aggrieved by the order of the ld. CIT (Exemption), the assessee preferred the present appeals before us on the grounds mentioned hereinabove. All the grounds raised by the assessee are inter-related and inter-connected and relates to challenging the order of ld. CIT (Exemption

INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTION), JAIPUR vs. M/S APOLLO ANIMAL MEDICAL GROUP TRUST, JAIPUR

In the result, the grounds of appeal taken by the Revenue are dismissed

iii) Accordingly to the Sl. No. 6 of part I of 10B report, it was pointed out by the CA that funds of the trust were not invested or deposited in the manner laid down in section 11(2)(b) of the IT Act, 1961. iv) it was also seen that funds

CENTRE FOR DEVELOPMENT COMMUNICATION TRUST,JAIPUR vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX EXEMPTION, JAIPUR

iii) of\nsub-section (4) of section 12AB:\nB.\nImpugned order is invalid and bad in law.\n8.\nIt is humbly submitted that the impugned order of cancellation of registration is\ninvalid and is bad in law on various grounds, which grounds are raised without prejudice\nto each other grounds, the said grounds are as follows:\na.\nAssumption of jurisdiction

M/S GVK JAIPUR EXPRESSWAY PRIVATE LIMITED,TELANGANA vs. PCIT 2, JAIPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

reassessment proceedings. This being the case, the assessment\norder could not be subjected to revision u/s 263 and the action of Ld.\nPr.CIT in invoking jurisdiction u/s 263 could not be sustained in the eyes\nof law. Similar is the view of the Tribunal in assessee's group concern i.e.\nM/s Reliance Corporate IT Park