BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “reassessment”+ Section 43Cclear

Sorted by relevance

Ahmedabad22Jaipur4Delhi3Kolkata3Bangalore2Mumbai2Hyderabad1Surat1

Key Topics

Section 44A15Section 14811Section 1475Section 1444Section 271(1)(c)4Section 40A(3)4Addition to Income4Section 37(1)2Penalty2

SH. HARI PRAKASH GUPTA,JAIPUR vs. ITO, WARD-1(2), JAIPUR, JAIPUR

The appeal stands allowed

ITA 771/JPR/2025[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur18 Sept 2025AY 2010-11
For Appellant: Shri P. C. Parwal, CAFor Respondent: Shri Gautam Singh Choudhary, JCIT
Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 271(1)(c)Section 37(1)Section 44A

Reassessment proceedings as also subsequent recovery of tax are quashed and set aside. Mrs. ShubhashriPanickerVs. CIT (2018) 166 DTR 1 (Raj.) (HC) Notice under sec. 148 having been sent to an address where the assessee was not residing, presumption of service cannot be drawn. CIT Vs. ITC Hotels (2015) 231 Taxman 57 (Kar.) (HC) When notice

SH. HARI PRAKASH GUPTA,JAIPUR vs. ITO, WARD-1(2), JAIPUR, JAIPUR

The appeal stands allowed

ITA 772/JPR/2025[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur18 Sept 2025AY 2010-11

Bench: SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member), SHRI NARINDER KUMAR (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri P. C. Parwal, CAFor Respondent: Shri Gautam Singh Choudhary, JCIT
Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 271(1)(c)Section 37(1)Section 44A

Reassessment proceedings as also subsequent recovery of tax are quashed and set aside. Mrs. ShubhashriPanickerVs. CIT (2018) 166 DTR 1 (Raj.) (HC) Notice under sec. 148 having been sent to an address where the assessee was not residing, presumption of service cannot be drawn. CIT Vs. ITC Hotels (2015) 231 Taxman 57 (Kar.) (HC) When notice

ITO, JAIPUR vs. RAJESH KUMAR GUPTA, ALWAR

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1138/JPR/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur27 Feb 2017AY 2011-12
For Appellant: Shri Tarun Mittal &For Respondent: Shri Raj Mehra
Section 133Section 143(1)Section 147Section 28Section 40Section 40(3)Section 40A(3)Section 43CSection 44A

reassessment proceedings under section 147/148 of the Act, this fact was never put into any doubt. The accepted turnover of the assessee is covered under section 44AD of the Act. Now the only bone of contention is whether the section 40A(3) would be applicable when the income ITA 1138/JP/2016_ 3 ITO Vs Rajesh Kumar Gupta declared is covered under

AKSH OPTIFIBRE LIMITED,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CIRCLE - 2, ALWAR

In the result, all the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 170/JPR/2024[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur20 May 2025AY 2010-11
For Appellant: Shri Akul Agarwal, C.A. (thr. V.C.)For Respondent: Shri Arvind Kumar, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 156Section 234ASection 250

43C; 47 (vi);\n(via) (viaa) (viab), 47 (vii); 72A, 72AB, etc. under the Income Tax Act. wherein the event\nof amalgamation, the method of treatment of a particular subject matter is expressly\nindicated in the provisions of the Act. In some instances, amalgamation results in\nwithdrawal of a special benefit (such as an area exemption under Section 801A) because