DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. SUBHASH CHANDRA BANKA, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

reassessment proceeding. Even otherwise the apex court has also\nwhile dealing with the provision of section 147/148 of the Act in the case of\nParashuram Pottery Works Co. Ltd Vs ITO [1977] 106 ITR 1 held that;\n\"According to section 148 of the Act of 1961, before making the assessment,\nreassessment or recomputation under section 147, the Income

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. PRIYA DEWAN, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

reassessment proceeding. Even otherwise the apex court has also\nwhile dealing with the provision of section 147/148 of the Act in the case of\nParashuram Pottery Works Co. Ltd Vs ITO [1977] 106 ITR 1 held that;\n"According to section 148 of the Act of 1961, before making the assessment,\nreassessment or recomputation under section 147, the Income

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. TRILOK DEWAN, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

reassessment proceeding. Even otherwise the apex court has also\nwhile dealing with the provision of section 147/148 of the Act in the case of\nParashuram Pottery Works Co. Ltd Vs ITO [1977] 106 ITR 1 held that;\n\"According to section 148 of the Act of 1961, before making the assessment,\nreassessment or recomputation under section 147, the Income

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. VIPUL BANKA, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

reassessment proceeding. Even otherwise the apex court has also\nwhile dealing with the provision of section 147/148 of the Act in the case of\nParashuram Pottery Works Co. Ltd Vs ITO [1977] 106 ITR 1 held that;\n\"According to section 148 of the Act of 1961, before making the assessment,\nreassessment or recomputation under section 147, the Income

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. SNEHLATA AGARWAL, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

reassessment proceeding. Even otherwise the apex court has also\nwhile dealing with the provision of section 147/148 of the Act in the case of\nParashuram Pottery Works Co. Ltd Vs ITO [1977] 106 ITR 1 held that;\n\"According to section 148 of the Act of 1961, before making the assessment,\nreassessment or recomputation under section 147, the Income

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. SARITA DEWAN, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

reassessment proceeding. Even otherwise the apex court has also\nwhile dealing with the provision of section 147/148 of the Act in the case of\nParashuram Pottery Works Co. Ltd Vs ITO [1977] 106 ITR 1 held that;\n\"According to section 148 of the Act of 1961, before making the assessment,\nreassessment or recomputation under section 147, the Income

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. PRIYA DEWAN, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

reassessment proceeding. Even otherwise the apex court has also\nwhile dealing with the provision of section 147/148 of the Act in the case of\nParashuram Pottery Works Co. Ltd Vs ITO [1977] 106 ITR 1 held that;\n\"According to section 148 of the Act of 1961, before making the assessment,\nreassessment or recomputation under section 147, the Income

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. USHA BANKA, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

reassessment proceeding. Even otherwise the apex court has also\nwhile dealing with the provision of section 147/148 of the Act in the case of\nParashuram Pottery Works Co. Ltd Vs ITO [1977] 106 ITR 1 held that;\n\"According to section 148 of the Act of 1961, before making the assessment,\nreassessment or recomputation under section 147, the Income

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR , JAIPUR vs. USHA BANKA, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

reassessment proceeding. Even otherwise the apex court has also\nwhile dealing with the provision of section 147/148 of the Act in the case of\nParashuram Pottery Works Co. Ltd Vs ITO [1977] 106 ITR 1 held that;\n\"According to section 148 of the Act of 1961, before making the assessment,\nreassessment or recomputation under section 147, the Income

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. ANIMESH AGARWAL, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

reassessment proceeding. Even otherwise the apex court has also\nwhile dealing with the provision of section 147/148 of the Act in the case of\nParashuram Pottery Works Co. Ltd Vs ITO [1977] 106 ITR 1 held that;\n\"According to section 148 of the Act of 1961, before making the assessment,\nreassessment or recomputation under section 147, the Income

RSD CONTAINERS PRIVATE LIMITED,JAIPUR vs. ITO, WARD 7(1), JAIPUR, JAIPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

reassessment notice. Section 151 of the new regime does not prescribe a time limit within which a specified authority has to grant sanction. Rather, it links up the time limits with the jurisdiction of the authority to grant sanction. Section 151(ii) of the new regime prescribes a higher level of authority if more than three years have elapsed from

CENTRE FOR DEVELOPMENT COMMUNICATION TRUST,JAIPUR vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX EXEMPTION, JAIPUR

reassessment.\n5.\nThe said section is not applicable in the present as the contentions raised are\nrelating to illegality of the Impugned Order as well as exercising power without authority\nof law and without jurisdiction.\n6.\nIn view of the above, the Ld. CIT(E) has wrongly contended that Appellant has\nparticipated in the proceedings therefore, it is precluded from

LATE SHRI JITENDRA NAGAR THROUGH HIS L/R SMT. DEEPIKA NAGAR,BARAN vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD BARAN, BARAN

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: The Date Of Hearing.”

Section 148-A(d) in respect of each of the assesses concerned.” Further, it directed the assessing officers to issue a notice under section 148 of the new regime “after following the procedure as required under Section 148-A.” Although this Court waived off the requirement of obtaining prior approval under Section 148A(a) and Section 148A(b

DCIT, CC-2, JAIPUR vs. M/S. ROYAL JEWELLERS, JAIPUR

In the result, appeals of the revenue stands dismissed

Bench: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

reassessments contemplated under section 153A. There is also no requirement under section 153A and other provisions requiring the Department to collect information and evidence for each and every year for six previous years under section 153A. Therefore, the argument of assessee that the information gathered either during pre-search enquiry or during the course of search cannot be made

DCIT, CC-2, JAIPUR vs. M/S. ROYAL JEWELLERS, JAIPUR

In the result, appeals of the revenue stands dismissed

Bench: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

reassessments contemplated under section 153A. There is also no requirement under section 153A and other provisions requiring the Department to collect information and evidence for each and every year for six previous years under section 153A. Therefore, the argument of assessee that the information gathered either during pre-search enquiry or during the course of search cannot be made

DCIT, CC-2, JAIPUR vs. M/S. ROYAL JEWELLERS, JAIPUR

In the result, appeals of the revenue stands dismissed

Bench: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

reassessments contemplated under section 153A. There is also no requirement under section 153A and other provisions requiring the Department to collect information and evidence for each and every year for six previous years under section 153A. Therefore, the argument of assessee that the information gathered either during pre-search enquiry or during the course of search cannot be made

LOVELY PROMOTERS PRIVATE LIMITED,KOLKATA vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, AJMER, AJMER

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

Bench: him regarding non mentioning of Document Identification Number (DIN) in the body of the order u/s. 127 of the Act dated 08-09-2021 and various other technical pleas raised in grounds of appeal regarding validity of notice u/s. 148 of the Act, thereby appellate order passed by the CIT(A) is non-speaking order and deserves to be quashed. 4. On the facts and in circumstances of the case and in law, the AO erred in issuing notice u/s. 148 of the Act as it was a search related case u/s. 132 r/w

reassessment of escaped income but to tap undisclosed income in a search related case, S. 148 has no jurisdiction. The Appellant is a person related to search. The issue of Notice u/s. 148 is not tenable as it is a search related case (as per AO’s himself 36 Lovely promoters Pvt. Ltd. vs. ACIT allegation which was confirmed

DCIT, CC-2, JAIPUR vs. SHRI VIMAL CHAND SURANA(HUF), JAIPUR

In the result, the appeal of the revenue stands dismissed

Bench: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

B of the Act which took care of the assessment to be made in cases of search and seizure. Such an assessment was popularly known as block assessment because the Chapter provided for a single assessment to be made in respect of a period of a block of ten assessment years prior to the assessment year in which the search