DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. PRIYA DEWAN, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

reassessment proceeding. Even otherwise the apex court has also\nwhile dealing with the provision of section 147/148 of the Act in the case of\nParashuram Pottery Works Co. Ltd Vs ITO [1977] 106 ITR 1 held that;\n"According to section 148 of the Act of 1961, before making the assessment,\nreassessment or recomputation under section 147, the Income

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. SARITA DEWAN, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

reassessment proceeding. Even otherwise the apex court has also\nwhile dealing with the provision of section 147/148 of the Act in the case of\nParashuram Pottery Works Co. Ltd Vs ITO [1977] 106 ITR 1 held that;\n\"According to section 148 of the Act of 1961, before making the assessment,\nreassessment or recomputation under section 147, the Income

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. SNEHLATA AGARWAL, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

reassessment proceeding. Even otherwise the apex court has also\nwhile dealing with the provision of section 147/148 of the Act in the case of\nParashuram Pottery Works Co. Ltd Vs ITO [1977] 106 ITR 1 held that;\n\"According to section 148 of the Act of 1961, before making the assessment,\nreassessment or recomputation under section 147, the Income

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. SUBHASH CHANDRA BANKA, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

reassessment proceeding. Even otherwise the apex court has also\nwhile dealing with the provision of section 147/148 of the Act in the case of\nParashuram Pottery Works Co. Ltd Vs ITO [1977] 106 ITR 1 held that;\n\"According to section 148 of the Act of 1961, before making the assessment,\nreassessment or recomputation under section 147, the Income

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. TRILOK DEWAN, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

reassessment proceeding. Even otherwise the apex court has also\nwhile dealing with the provision of section 147/148 of the Act in the case of\nParashuram Pottery Works Co. Ltd Vs ITO [1977] 106 ITR 1 held that;\n\"According to section 148 of the Act of 1961, before making the assessment,\nreassessment or recomputation under section 147, the Income

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR , JAIPUR vs. USHA BANKA, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

reassessment proceeding. Even otherwise the apex court has also\nwhile dealing with the provision of section 147/148 of the Act in the case of\nParashuram Pottery Works Co. Ltd Vs ITO [1977] 106 ITR 1 held that;\n\"According to section 148 of the Act of 1961, before making the assessment,\nreassessment or recomputation under section 147, the Income

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. SARITA DEWAN, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

reassessment proceeding. Even otherwise the apex court has also\nwhile dealing with the provision of section 147/148 of the Act in the case of\nParashuram Pottery Works Co. Ltd Vs ITO [1977] 106 ITR 1 held that;\n\"According to section 148 of the Act of 1961, before making the assessment,\nreassessment or recomputation under section 147, the Income

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. VIPUL BANKA, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

reassessment proceeding. Even otherwise the apex court has also\nwhile dealing with the provision of section 147/148 of the Act in the case of\nParashuram Pottery Works Co. Ltd Vs ITO [1977] 106 ITR 1 held that;\n\"According to section 148 of the Act of 1961, before making the assessment,\nreassessment or recomputation under section 147, the Income

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. PRIYA DEWAN, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

reassessment proceeding. Even otherwise the apex court has also\nwhile dealing with the provision of section 147/148 of the Act in the case of\nParashuram Pottery Works Co. Ltd Vs ITO [1977] 106 ITR 1 held that;\n\"According to section 148 of the Act of 1961, before making the assessment,\nreassessment or recomputation under section 147, the Income

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. ANIMESH AGARWAL, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

reassessment proceeding. Even otherwise the apex court has also\nwhile dealing with the provision of section 147/148 of the Act in the case of\nParashuram Pottery Works Co. Ltd Vs ITO [1977] 106 ITR 1 held that;\n\"According to section 148 of the Act of 1961, before making the assessment,\nreassessment or recomputation under section 147, the Income

RSD CONTAINERS PRIVATE LIMITED,JAIPUR vs. ITO, WARD 7(1), JAIPUR, JAIPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

reassessment notice. Section 151 of the new regime does not prescribe a time limit within which a specified authority has to grant sanction. Rather, it links up the time limits with the jurisdiction of the authority to grant sanction. Section 151(ii) of the new regime prescribes a higher level of authority if more than three years have elapsed from

LATE SHRI JITENDRA NAGAR THROUGH HIS L/R SMT. DEEPIKA NAGAR,BARAN vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD BARAN, BARAN

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: The Date Of Hearing.”

Section 148-A(d) in respect of each of the assesses concerned.” Further, it directed the assessing officers to issue a notice under section 148 of the new regime “after following the procedure as required under Section 148-A.” Although this Court waived off the requirement of obtaining prior approval under Section 148A(a) and Section 148A(b

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, AJMER vs. M/S SHRI RAJLAXMI DENIM, BHILWARA

In the result, appeal of the revenue is allowed

41 taxmann.com 524 (Allahabad) ITA 1134/JP/2018_ 5 DCIT Vs. Shri Rajlaxmi Denim (iv) Karandhai Tamil Sangam Vs Joint/Addl.CIT (2018) 97 taxmann.com 50 (Chennai Trib). The ld CIT-Dr has also advanced the arguments at length on the point that once the notice U/s 143(2) of the Act was issued by the ITO Ward (3), Bhilwara then no second notice

RAMESH CHAND BANSAL,BEAWAR vs. DCIT, AJMER

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed

reassessment, if any, relating to any assessment year falling within the period of six assessment years referred to in this sub-section pending on the date of initiation of the search under Section 132 or making of requisition under Section 132A, as the case may be, shall abate.” What is clear from this is that Section 153A

RAJ KUMAR JAIN,JAIPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE – 2, JAIPUR, JAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

41 ITR 465 and Mumbai ITAT Bench in the case of Sandhya Gadkari Sharma vs. DCIT (2016) 142 DTR 129 have also followed the decision. All these decision imposed a duty upon the Learned Assessing Officer for following the due procedure in the course of levy of penalty by issuing correct and relevant show cause notices. These decisions have laid

DCIT, CC-2, JAIPUR vs. M/S. ROYAL JEWELLERS, JAIPUR

In the result, appeals of the revenue stands dismissed

Bench: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

reassessments contemplated under section 153A. There is also no requirement under section 153A and other provisions requiring the Department to collect information and evidence for each and every year for six previous years under section 153A. Therefore, the argument of assessee that the information gathered either during pre-search enquiry or during the course of search cannot be made

DCIT, CC-2, JAIPUR vs. M/S. ROYAL JEWELLERS, JAIPUR

In the result, appeals of the revenue stands dismissed

Bench: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

reassessments contemplated under section 153A. There is also no requirement under section 153A and other provisions requiring the Department to collect information and evidence for each and every year for six previous years under section 153A. Therefore, the argument of assessee that the information gathered either during pre-search enquiry or during the course of search cannot be made

DCIT, CC-2, JAIPUR vs. M/S. ROYAL JEWELLERS, JAIPUR

In the result, appeals of the revenue stands dismissed

Bench: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

reassessments contemplated under section 153A. There is also no requirement under section 153A and other provisions requiring the Department to collect information and evidence for each and every year for six previous years under section 153A. Therefore, the argument of assessee that the information gathered either during pre-search enquiry or during the course of search cannot be made