DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. SARITA DEWAN, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

iii)\nin case any incriminating material is found/unearthed, even, in case of\nunabated/completed assessments, the AO would assume the jurisdiction to\nassess or reassess the 'total income' taking into consideration the\nincriminating material unearthed during the search and the other material\navailable with the AO including the income declared in the returns; and\n(iv)\nin case no incriminating material

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. SUBHASH CHANDRA BANKA, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

iii) in case any incriminating material is found/unearthed, even, in case of\nunabated/completed assessments, the AO would assume the jurisdiction to\nassess or reassess the 'total income' taking into consideration the\nincriminating material unearthed during the search and the other material\navailable with the AO including the income declared in the returns; and\n(iv) in case no incriminating material

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. VIPUL BANKA, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

iii) in case any incriminating material is found/unearthed, even, in case of\nunabated/completed assessments, the AO would assume the jurisdiction to\nassess or reassess the 'total income' taking into consideration the\nincriminating material unearthed during the search and the other material\navailable with the AO including the income declared in the returns; and\n(iv) in case no incriminating material

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. SNEHLATA AGARWAL, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

iii)\nin case any incriminating material is found/unearthed, even, in case of\nunabated/completed assessments, the AO would assume the jurisdiction to\nassess or reassess the 'total income' taking into consideration the\nincriminating material unearthed during the search and the other material\navailable with the AO including the income declared in the returns; and\n(iv)\nin case no incriminating material

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. USHA BANKA, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

iii)\nin case any incriminating material is found/unearthed, even, in case of\nunabated/completed assessments, the AO would assume the jurisdiction to\nassess or reassess the 'total income' taking into consideration the\nincriminating material unearthed during the search and the other material\navailable with the AO including the income declared in the returns; and\n(iv)\nin case no incriminating material

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. PRIYA DEWAN, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

iii)\nin case any incriminating material is found/unearthed, even, in case of\nunabated/completed assessments, the AO would assume the jurisdiction to\nassess or reassess the 'total income' taking into consideration the\nincriminating material unearthed during the search and the other material\navailable with the AO including the income declared in the returns; and\n(iv)\nin case no incriminating material

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. SARITA DEWAN, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

iii) in case any incriminating material is found/unearthed, even, in case of\nunabated/completed assessments, the AO would assume the jurisdiction to\nassess or reassess the 'total income' taking into consideration the\nincriminating material unearthed during the search and the other material\navailable with the AO including the income declared in the returns; and\n(iv) in case no incriminating material

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. PRIYA DEWAN, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

iii) in case any incriminating material is found/unearthed, even, in case of\nunabated/completed assessments, the AO would assume the jurisdiction to\nassess or reassess the 'total income' taking into consideration the\nincriminating material unearthed during the search and the other material\navailable with the AO including the income declared in the returns; and\n(iv) in case no incriminating material

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. TRILOK DEWAN, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

iii)\nin case any incriminating material is found/unearthed, even, in case of\nunabated/completed assessments, the AO would assume the jurisdiction to\nassess or reassess the 'total income' taking into consideration the\nincriminating material unearthed during the search and the other material\navailable with the AO including the income declared in the returns; and\n(iv)\nin case no incriminating material

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. ANIMESH AGARWAL, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

iii)\nin case any incriminating material is found/unearthed, even, in case of\nunabated/completed assessments, the AO would assume the jurisdiction to\nassess or reassess the 'total income' taking into consideration the\nincriminating material unearthed during the search and the other material\navailable with the AO including the income declared in the returns; and\n(iv)\nin case no incriminating material

M/S GVK JAIPUR EXPRESSWAY PRIVATE LIMITED,TELANGANA vs. PCIT 2, JAIPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

36(1)(iii) instead of\nu/s 14A;\n2. No addition on account of Finance charges of Rs.5,19,49,691/- by\nmisunderstanding the same as part of periodic overlay expenses; and\nnot making adjustment on account of addition made for Periodic\nOverlay expenses while computing book profit;\n3. Amortisation of expenses on construction of toll road;\n4. Donation already added

LATE SHRI JITENDRA NAGAR THROUGH HIS L/R SMT. DEEPIKA NAGAR,BARAN vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD BARAN, BARAN

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: The Date Of Hearing.”

iii) issue a notice under Section 148 if it was a fit case for reassessment. Once the clock started ticking, the assessing officer was required to complete these procedures within the surviving time limit. The surviving time limit, as prescribed under the Income Tax Act read with TOLA, was available to the assessing officers to issue the reassessment notices under

DCIT, CC-2, JAIPUR vs. M/S. ROYAL JEWELLERS, JAIPUR

In the result, appeals of the revenue stands dismissed

Bench: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

36 Taxmann.com 523. In the said case, the facts were that A search under Section 132(1) of the Act was conducted at various business premises of Suncity Alloys Group of Companies, Jodhpur, to which, the appellant firm belong and at the residence of directors/partners of various firms/companies on 20.02.2004. Several incriminating documents were recovered from the residential premises

DCIT, CC-2, JAIPUR vs. M/S. ROYAL JEWELLERS, JAIPUR

In the result, appeals of the revenue stands dismissed

Bench: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

36 Taxmann.com 523. In the said case, the facts were that A search under Section 132(1) of the Act was conducted at various business premises of Suncity Alloys Group of Companies, Jodhpur, to which, the appellant firm belong and at the residence of directors/partners of various firms/companies on 20.02.2004. Several incriminating documents were recovered from the residential premises

DCIT, CC-2, JAIPUR vs. M/S. ROYAL JEWELLERS, JAIPUR

In the result, appeals of the revenue stands dismissed

Bench: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

36 Taxmann.com 523. In the said case, the facts were that A search under Section 132(1) of the Act was conducted at various business premises of Suncity Alloys Group of Companies, Jodhpur, to which, the appellant firm belong and at the residence of directors/partners of various firms/companies on 20.02.2004. Several incriminating documents were recovered from the residential premises

INCOME TAX OFFICER , SIKAR vs. BHASKAR CHAUHAN, JAIPUR

In the result the appeal of the revenue in ITA no

Bench: Him.

reassessment under Sections 139,147,148,149,151 & 153. " In view of the above discussion, the assessment completed u/s 144 deserves to be quashed. The order of the Learned CIT(A) also deserved to be quashed on this ground. Additional Ground No.2 On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Learned

OM KOTHARI FOUNDATION,JAIPUR, RAJASTHAN vs. ITO, (EXEMPTION) WARD-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR, RAJASTHAN

In the result, the appeals of the assessee in ITA No

Bench: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (Judicial Member), DR MITHA LAL MEENA (Accountant Member)

reassessment is to be done in two different stages challenging the reasons of reopening and (i) challenging the assessment order. Assessee's challenge to the order of the assessing officer rejecting the objection against the reasons of reopening and assessce's challenge to the assessment order are two separate proceedings. Assessee cannot challenge order of the assessing officer disposing objections

VINITA BAJORIA,JAIPUR vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, JAIPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI, AM आयकर अपील सं./ITA No. 370/JP/2025 निर्धारण वर्ष / Assessment Year : 2016-17 Vinita Bajoria 1, Ganesh Colony Moti Doongri Road, Jaipur बनाम Income Tax Officer, Ward 5(2), Jaipur स्थायी लेखा सं. / जीआईआर सं./PAN/GIR No.: AEBPB4873M अपीलार्थी / Appellant प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent निर्धारिती की ओर से / Assessee by: Sh. Manoj Choudhary, CA राजस्व की ओर से / Revenue by : Sh. Gorav Avasthi, JCIT सुनवाई की तारीख / Date of Hear

iii) issue a notice under section 148 if it was a fit case for reassessment. Once the clock started ticking, the assessing officer was required to complete these procedures within the surviving time limit. The surviving time limit, as prescribed under the Income-tax Act read with TOLA, was available to the assessing officers to issue the reassessment notices under