DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. PRIYA DEWAN, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

35-40), and the provisions of Section 150 of the Act.\nThe assessee, while supporting the ultimate relief granted, is aggrieved\nby the directions given by the Id. CIT(A) in his order suggesting the AO\ninitiate proceedings under Section 147/148 of the Act. The assessee\ntherefore before us by preferring the present Cross-Objection to challenge\nthe directions

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. TRILOK DEWAN, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

35-40), and the provisions of Section 150 of the Act.\nThe assessee, while supporting the ultimate relief granted, is aggrieved\nby the directions given by the Id. CIT(A) in his order suggesting the AO\ninitiate proceedings under Section 147/148 of the Act. The assessee\ntherefore before us by preferring the present Cross-Objection to challenge\nthe directions

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. SARITA DEWAN, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

35-40), and the provisions of Section 150 of the Act.\nThe assessee, while supporting the ultimate relief granted, is aggrieved\nby the directions given by the Id. CIT(A) in his order suggesting the AO\ninitiate proceedings under Section 147/148 of the Act. The assessee\ntherefore before us by preferring the present Cross-Objection to challenge\nthe directions

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. SARITA DEWAN, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

35-40), and the provisions of Section 150 of the Act.\nThe assessee, while supporting the ultimate relief granted, is aggrieved\nby the directions given by the Id. CIT(A) in his order suggesting the AO\ninitiate proceedings under Section 147/148 of the Act. The assessee\ntherefore before us by preferring the present Cross-Objection to challenge\nthe directions

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. VIPUL BANKA, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

35-40), and the provisions of Section 150 of the Act.\nThe assessee, while supporting the ultimate relief granted, is aggrieved\nby the directions given by the Id. CIT(A) in his order suggesting the AO\ninitiate proceedings under Section 147/148 of the Act. The assessee\ntherefore before us by preferring the present Cross-Objection to challenge\nthe directions

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. USHA BANKA, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

35-40), and the provisions of Section 150 of the Act.\nThe assessee, while supporting the ultimate relief granted, is aggrieved\nby the directions given by the Id. CIT(A) in his order suggesting the AO\ninitiate proceedings under Section 147/148 of the Act. The assessee\ntherefore before us by preferring the present Cross-Objection to challenge\nthe directions

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. SNEHLATA AGARWAL, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

35-40), and the provisions of Section 150 of the Act.\nThe assessee, while supporting the ultimate relief granted, is aggrieved\nby the directions given by the Id. CIT(A) in his order suggesting the AO\ninitiate proceedings under Section 147/148 of the Act. The assessee\ntherefore before us by preferring the present Cross-Objection to challenge\nthe directions

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR , JAIPUR vs. USHA BANKA, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

35-40), and the provisions of Section 150 of the Act.\nThe assessee, while supporting the ultimate relief granted, is aggrieved\nby the directions given by the Id. CIT(A) in his order suggesting the AO\ninitiate proceedings under Section 147/148 of the Act. The assessee\ntherefore before us by preferring the present Cross-Objection to challenge\nthe directions

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. SUBHASH CHANDRA BANKA, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

35-40), and the provisions of Section 150 of the Act.\nThe assessee, while supporting the ultimate relief granted, is aggrieved\nby the directions given by the Id. CIT(A) in his order suggesting the AO\ninitiate proceedings under Section 147/148 of the Act. The assessee\ntherefore before us by preferring the present Cross-Objection to challenge\nthe directions

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. ANIMESH AGARWAL, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

35-40), and the provisions of Section 150 of the Act.\nThe assessee, while supporting the ultimate relief granted, is aggrieved\nby the directions given by the Id. CIT(A) in his order suggesting the AO\ninitiate proceedings under Section 147/148 of the Act. The assessee\ntherefore before us by preferring the present Cross-Objection to challenge\nthe directions

LATE SHRI JITENDRA NAGAR THROUGH HIS L/R SMT. DEEPIKA NAGAR,BARAN vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD BARAN, BARAN

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: The Date Of Hearing.”

35-37 585 (ITAT Mumbai) Keshri Rice Industries v. DCIT 2025 (4) TMI 1027 (ITAT 5. 38-51 Raipur) 6. ACIT v. Surya Ferrous Alloys Pvt. Ltd 2025 (1) TMI 326 52-56 (ITAT Mumbai) 7. Abdul Saeed Issak Mulla v. International Tax 2025 (2) TMI 57-60 444 (ITAT Mumbai) 24 Late Shri Jitendra Nagar through L/R Smt. Deepika

RASHLEELA ENTERPRISES PRIVATE LIMITED, JAIPUR,JAIPUR vs. ACIT CEN CIR 3, JAIPUR, JAIPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Dr. S. Seethalakshmi & Shri Gagan Goyalrashleela Enterprises Pvt. Ltd., C-5, Krishna Balram, Calgiri Road, Malviya Nagar, Jaipur 302017. Pan No.: Aadcr2594J ...... Appellant Vs.

reassessment proceedings being illegal and without jurisdiction. 3. In the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, Ld. CIT(A) has erred in confirming the action of the Ld. AO, in passing the order without proper opportunity of cross examination. The action of the Ld. CIT (A) is illegal, unjustified, arbitrary and against the facts of the case

DCIT, CC-2, JAIPUR vs. M/S. ROYAL JEWELLERS, JAIPUR

In the result, appeals of the revenue stands dismissed

Bench: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

ii) The head note in the case of E.N. Gopakumar Vs CIT [2016] 75 taxmann.com 215 (Kerala) is as under. "Section 153A, read with section 132, of the Income-tax Act, 1961-Search & seizure-Assessment in case of (Scope of Whether for issuance of a notice under section 1534(1)(a), it is not necessary that search on which

DCIT, CC-2, JAIPUR vs. M/S. ROYAL JEWELLERS, JAIPUR

In the result, appeals of the revenue stands dismissed

Bench: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

ii) The head note in the case of E.N. Gopakumar Vs CIT [2016] 75 taxmann.com 215 (Kerala) is as under. "Section 153A, read with section 132, of the Income-tax Act, 1961-Search & seizure-Assessment in case of (Scope of Whether for issuance of a notice under section 1534(1)(a), it is not necessary that search on which

DCIT, CC-2, JAIPUR vs. M/S. ROYAL JEWELLERS, JAIPUR

In the result, appeals of the revenue stands dismissed

Bench: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

ii) The head note in the case of E.N. Gopakumar Vs CIT [2016] 75 taxmann.com 215 (Kerala) is as under. "Section 153A, read with section 132, of the Income-tax Act, 1961-Search & seizure-Assessment in case of (Scope of Whether for issuance of a notice under section 1534(1)(a), it is not necessary that search on which

DCIT, CC-2, JAIPUR vs. SHRI VIMAL CHAND SURANA(HUF), JAIPUR

In the result, the appeal of the revenue stands dismissed

Bench: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

ii) (prior to substitution by Finance Act, 2016 w.e.f. 1-6-2016, now Section 153 (6) (i) expl.2) no doubt are relevant to Section 150 but as held by Gujrat High Court in case of CIT v. G. Viswanatham. (1988) 172 ITR 401, 408 (AP) Explanations 2 and 3, are relevant also to section 150, but their purpose is merely

RSD CONTAINERS PRIVATE LIMITED,JAIPUR vs. ITO, WARD 7(1), JAIPUR, JAIPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

35 RSD Containers Pvt Ltd. vs ITO 11/07/2022, the said notice issued under Section 148 of the Act is time barred and therefore, bad in law. Therefore, notice, dated 28/07/2022, issued under Section 148 of the Act (new regime), the consequential reassessment proceedings and the Assessment Order, dated 11.05.2023, passed under Section 147 read with Section 144B

SONU AGARWAL ,JAIPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1(3), JAIPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

ii) of the Act. PRAYER In view of the above facts, statutory provisions, and judicial precedents, it is most respectfully prayed that: 1. The impugned notice dated 26.07.2022 issued under Section 148 for A.Y.2016- 2017 be quashed and set aside. 2. The consequential reassessment order dated 29.05.2023 passed under section 147 r.w.s 144B along with all consequential additions be quashed