DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. SNEHLATA AGARWAL, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

35-40), and the provisions of Section 150 of the Act.\nThe assessee, while supporting the ultimate relief granted, is aggrieved\nby the directions given by the Id. CIT(A) in his order suggesting the AO\ninitiate proceedings under Section 147/148 of the Act. The assessee\ntherefore before us by preferring the present Cross-Objection to challenge\nthe directions

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. SARITA DEWAN, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

35-40), and the provisions of Section 150 of the Act.\nThe assessee, while supporting the ultimate relief granted, is aggrieved\nby the directions given by the Id. CIT(A) in his order suggesting the AO\ninitiate proceedings under Section 147/148 of the Act. The assessee\ntherefore before us by preferring the present Cross-Objection to challenge\nthe directions

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. USHA BANKA, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

35-40), and the provisions of Section 150 of the Act.\nThe assessee, while supporting the ultimate relief granted, is aggrieved\nby the directions given by the Id. CIT(A) in his order suggesting the AO\ninitiate proceedings under Section 147/148 of the Act. The assessee\ntherefore before us by preferring the present Cross-Objection to challenge\nthe directions

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. SARITA DEWAN, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

35-40), and the provisions of Section 150 of the Act.\nThe assessee, while supporting the ultimate relief granted, is aggrieved\nby the directions given by the Id. CIT(A) in his order suggesting the AO\ninitiate proceedings under Section 147/148 of the Act. The assessee\ntherefore before us by preferring the present Cross-Objection to challenge\nthe directions

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. SUBHASH CHANDRA BANKA, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

35-40), and the provisions of Section 150 of the Act.\nThe assessee, while supporting the ultimate relief granted, is aggrieved\nby the directions given by the Id. CIT(A) in his order suggesting the AO\ninitiate proceedings under Section 147/148 of the Act. The assessee\ntherefore before us by preferring the present Cross-Objection to challenge\nthe directions

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR , JAIPUR vs. USHA BANKA, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

35-40), and the provisions of Section 150 of the Act.\nThe assessee, while supporting the ultimate relief granted, is aggrieved\nby the directions given by the Id. CIT(A) in his order suggesting the AO\ninitiate proceedings under Section 147/148 of the Act. The assessee\ntherefore before us by preferring the present Cross-Objection to challenge\nthe directions

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. PRIYA DEWAN, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

35-40), and the provisions of Section 150 of the Act.\nThe assessee, while supporting the ultimate relief granted, is aggrieved\nby the directions given by the Id. CIT(A) in his order suggesting the AO\ninitiate proceedings under Section 147/148 of the Act. The assessee\ntherefore before us by preferring the present Cross-Objection to challenge\nthe directions

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. PRIYA DEWAN, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

35-40), and the provisions of Section 150 of the Act.\nThe assessee, while supporting the ultimate relief granted, is aggrieved\nby the directions given by the Id. CIT(A) in his order suggesting the AO\ninitiate proceedings under Section 147/148 of the Act. The assessee\ntherefore before us by preferring the present Cross-Objection to challenge\nthe directions

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. VIPUL BANKA, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

35-40), and the provisions of Section 150 of the Act.\nThe assessee, while supporting the ultimate relief granted, is aggrieved\nby the directions given by the Id. CIT(A) in his order suggesting the AO\ninitiate proceedings under Section 147/148 of the Act. The assessee\ntherefore before us by preferring the present Cross-Objection to challenge\nthe directions

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. ANIMESH AGARWAL, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

35-40), and the provisions of Section 150 of the Act.\nThe assessee, while supporting the ultimate relief granted, is aggrieved\nby the directions given by the Id. CIT(A) in his order suggesting the AO\ninitiate proceedings under Section 147/148 of the Act. The assessee\ntherefore before us by preferring the present Cross-Objection to challenge\nthe directions

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JAIPUR vs. JITENDRA KUMAR AGARWAL, JAIPUR

In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

35,315/- which was detected during the survey proceedings u/s 133A of the I.T. Act?" 3.4 As is evident from the grounds of appeal that the issue raised in all these bunch of appeal are identical relating to the levy of penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) and we have heard these cases together with the consent of the parties

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TA , JAIPUR vs. SHRI NATH CORPORATION, JAIPUR

In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

35,315/- which was detected during the survey proceedings u/s 133A of the I.T. Act?\"\n3.4 As is evident from the grounds of appeal that the issue raised in all these bunch of appeal are identical relating to the levy of penalty u/s.271(1)(c) and we have heard these cases together with the consent of the parties and have

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, JAIPUR vs. ROYAL JEWELLERS, JAIPUR

In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

35,315/- which was detected during the survey proceedings u/s 133A of\nthe I.T. Act?\"\n3.4 As is evident from the grounds of appeal that the issue raised in all\nthese bunch of appeal are identical relating to the levy of penalty u/s.\n271(1)(c) and we have heard these cases together with the consent of the\nparties

LATE SHRI JITENDRA NAGAR THROUGH HIS L/R SMT. DEEPIKA NAGAR,BARAN vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD BARAN, BARAN

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: The Date Of Hearing.”

35-37 585 (ITAT Mumbai) Keshri Rice Industries v. DCIT 2025 (4) TMI 1027 (ITAT 5. 38-51 Raipur) 6. ACIT v. Surya Ferrous Alloys Pvt. Ltd 2025 (1) TMI 326 52-56 (ITAT Mumbai) 7. Abdul Saeed Issak Mulla v. International Tax 2025 (2) TMI 57-60 444 (ITAT Mumbai) 24 Late Shri Jitendra Nagar through L/R Smt. Deepika

DCIT, CC-2, JAIPUR vs. SHRI VIMAL CHAND SURANA(HUF), JAIPUR

In the result, the appeal of the revenue stands dismissed

Bench: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

1 before us is answered a) as under (a) In assessments that are abated, the A.O. retains the original jurisdiction as well as jurisdiction conferred on him under s. 153A for which assessments shall be made for each of the six assessment years separately ;' 16. In yet another case, the ITAT Mumbai Bench, in the case of State Bank

DCIT, CC-2, JAIPUR vs. M/S. ROYAL JEWELLERS, JAIPUR

In the result, appeals of the revenue stands dismissed

Bench: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

reassessments contemplated under section 153A. There is also no requirement under section 153A and other provisions requiring the Department to collect information and evidence for each and every year for six previous years under section 153A. Therefore, the argument of assessee that the information gathered either during pre-search enquiry or during the course of search cannot be made

DCIT, CC-2, JAIPUR vs. M/S. ROYAL JEWELLERS, JAIPUR

In the result, appeals of the revenue stands dismissed

Bench: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

reassessments contemplated under section 153A. There is also no requirement under section 153A and other provisions requiring the Department to collect information and evidence for each and every year for six previous years under section 153A. Therefore, the argument of assessee that the information gathered either during pre-search enquiry or during the course of search cannot be made

DCIT, CC-2, JAIPUR vs. M/S. ROYAL JEWELLERS, JAIPUR

In the result, appeals of the revenue stands dismissed

Bench: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

reassessments contemplated under section 153A. There is also no requirement under section 153A and other provisions requiring the Department to collect information and evidence for each and every year for six previous years under section 153A. Therefore, the argument of assessee that the information gathered either during pre-search enquiry or during the course of search cannot be made