BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “reassessment”+ Section 245Dclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai101Hyderabad43Delhi21Chennai18Allahabad16Cochin6Pune6Visakhapatnam5Jaipur4Lucknow2Kolkata2Ahmedabad1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)7Section 132(4)5Addition to Income4Section 132(1)3Section 153A3Section 153C3Section 142(1)2Section 143(2)2

ROHIT LADIWALA,JAIPUR vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR

ITA 339/JPR/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur17 Oct 2024AY 2015-16
For Appellant: Sh. Vinod Kumar Gupta, CAFor Respondent: MS. Alka Gautam, CIT(V.H)
Section 132(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 68Section 69

reassessment of the concluded assessments does not arise, which would\nrequire more reiteration and it is only in the context of the abated assessment\nunder second proviso which is required to be assessed. ”\nTherefore, in view of the submission made above and judicial precedents\n(supra), in case of completed assessment, assessment u/s 153A is confined to\nincriminating material, found

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR vs. SMT. PALLAVI MISHRA, JAIPUR

In the result, all the additional grounds of appeal as well as original ground of appeal no

ITA 1065/JPR/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur14 Jul 2021AY 2013-14
For Appellant: Shri G.M. Mehta (FCA)For Respondent: Shri B.K. Gupta (CIT) a
Section 132(1)Section 139Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 245D(4)

Section 153 prescribes the time limit for completion of assessment, reassessment and recomputation. According to which the same is to be completed within 21 months from the end of the assessment year in which the income was first assessable. After framing of assessment, the Assessing Officer becomes functus officio. He no longer remains in jurisdiction to redo or re-compute

DCIT, JAIPUR vs. SUMS EXIM PVT. LTD., JAIPUR

In the result , ground no. 2 raised by the revenue is dismissed

ITA 860/JPR/2016[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur24 Apr 2023AY 2009-10

Bench: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri B.P. Mundra, CAFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Dhariwal, CIT
Section 132(4)Section 153C

245D(4) of the Act as void because it has been obtained by fraud and misrepresentation of facts on the part of Sh Sanjay Jain & his entities. In view of these facts, AO is hereby directed under section 150(1) of the Act to re-open the case of Sh Sanjay Jain, M/s Shrey's India Pvt Ltd. M/s Supreme

RAJESH PRODUCTS,TONK ,RAJASTHAN vs. ACIT, JAIPUR

ITA 626/JPR/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur18 Jul 2024AY 2016-17
For Appellant: Shri Mahesh Jain, CA (Th. V.C)For Respondent: Shri Bhanwar Singh Ratnu, (CIT-DR)
Section 132(1)Section 132(4)Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)

245D(1) dated 08-05-2017. M/s RT Industries\nhad filed a Writ Petition before the Hon'ble Delhi High Court against this order.\n(ii) It is clarified that the above exhibits contain the entries related to M/s Rajesh\nProducts also, apart from those related to M/s RT Industries. For instance, the\nfollowing page nos. of exhibits mention