DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. SNEHLATA AGARWAL, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

reassessment proceeding. Even otherwise the apex court has also\nwhile dealing with the provision of section 147/148 of the Act in the case of\nParashuram Pottery Works Co. Ltd Vs ITO [1977] 106 ITR 1 held that;\n\"According to section 148 of the Act of 1961, before making the assessment,\nreassessment or recomputation under section 147, the Income

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. SARITA DEWAN, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

reassessment proceeding. Even otherwise the apex court has also\nwhile dealing with the provision of section 147/148 of the Act in the case of\nParashuram Pottery Works Co. Ltd Vs ITO [1977] 106 ITR 1 held that;\n\"According to section 148 of the Act of 1961, before making the assessment,\nreassessment or recomputation under section 147, the Income

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. SUBHASH CHANDRA BANKA, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

reassessment proceeding. Even otherwise the apex court has also\nwhile dealing with the provision of section 147/148 of the Act in the case of\nParashuram Pottery Works Co. Ltd Vs ITO [1977] 106 ITR 1 held that;\n\"According to section 148 of the Act of 1961, before making the assessment,\nreassessment or recomputation under section 147, the Income

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. VIPUL BANKA, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

reassessment proceeding. Even otherwise the apex court has also\nwhile dealing with the provision of section 147/148 of the Act in the case of\nParashuram Pottery Works Co. Ltd Vs ITO [1977] 106 ITR 1 held that;\n\"According to section 148 of the Act of 1961, before making the assessment,\nreassessment or recomputation under section 147, the Income

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. SARITA DEWAN, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

reassessment proceeding. Even otherwise the apex court has also\nwhile dealing with the provision of section 147/148 of the Act in the case of\nParashuram Pottery Works Co. Ltd Vs ITO [1977] 106 ITR 1 held that;\n\"According to section 148 of the Act of 1961, before making the assessment,\nreassessment or recomputation under section 147, the Income

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. TRILOK DEWAN, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

reassessment proceeding. Even otherwise the apex court has also\nwhile dealing with the provision of section 147/148 of the Act in the case of\nParashuram Pottery Works Co. Ltd Vs ITO [1977] 106 ITR 1 held that;\n\"According to section 148 of the Act of 1961, before making the assessment,\nreassessment or recomputation under section 147, the Income

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. PRIYA DEWAN, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

reassessment proceeding. Even otherwise the apex court has also\nwhile dealing with the provision of section 147/148 of the Act in the case of\nParashuram Pottery Works Co. Ltd Vs ITO [1977] 106 ITR 1 held that;\n"According to section 148 of the Act of 1961, before making the assessment,\nreassessment or recomputation under section 147, the Income

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. PRIYA DEWAN, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

reassessment proceeding. Even otherwise the apex court has also\nwhile dealing with the provision of section 147/148 of the Act in the case of\nParashuram Pottery Works Co. Ltd Vs ITO [1977] 106 ITR 1 held that;\n\"According to section 148 of the Act of 1961, before making the assessment,\nreassessment or recomputation under section 147, the Income

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. USHA BANKA, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

reassessment proceeding. Even otherwise the apex court has also\nwhile dealing with the provision of section 147/148 of the Act in the case of\nParashuram Pottery Works Co. Ltd Vs ITO [1977] 106 ITR 1 held that;\n\"According to section 148 of the Act of 1961, before making the assessment,\nreassessment or recomputation under section 147, the Income

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. ANIMESH AGARWAL, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

reassessment proceeding. Even otherwise the apex court has also\nwhile dealing with the provision of section 147/148 of the Act in the case of\nParashuram Pottery Works Co. Ltd Vs ITO [1977] 106 ITR 1 held that;\n\"According to section 148 of the Act of 1961, before making the assessment,\nreassessment or recomputation under section 147, the Income

NITU KHADARIYA,JAIPUR vs. ITO WARD 1(3), NCRB BUILDING

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

c) a requisition made under section 132A, after the 15th day of March of such financial year, a period of fifteen days shall be excluded for the purpose of computing the period of limitation as per this section and the notice issued under clause (b) of section 148A in such case shall be deemed to have been issued

AJOY SHARMA ,JAIPUR vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR

reassessment - Assessee filed a fresh\nreturn and paid differential tax and interest - Assessment was completed with no\naddition to disclosed income - However, Revenue imposed a penalty under\nSection 271(1)(c), alleging concealment of income or furnishing inaccurate\nparticulars of income - First Appellate Authority cancelled penalty due to lack of\nestablished concealment of income - Tribunal dismissed revenue's appeal

AJOY SHARMA,JAIPUR vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR

reassessment - Assessee filed a fresh\nreturn and paid differential tax and interest - Assessment was completed with no\naddition to disclosed income - However, Revenue imposed a penalty under\nSection 271(1)(c), alleging concealment of income or furnishing inaccurate\nparticulars of income - First Appellate Authority cancelled penalty due to lack of\nestablished concealment of income - Tribunal dismissed revenue's appeal

AJOY SHARMA ,JAIPUR vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR

reassessment - Assessee filed a fresh\nreturn and paid differential tax and interest - Assessment was completed with no\naddition to disclosed income - However, Revenue imposed a penalty under\nSection 271(1)(c), alleging concealment of income or furnishing inaccurate\nparticulars of income - First Appellate Authority cancelled penalty due to lack of\nestablished concealment of income - Tribunal dismissed revenue's appeal

AJOY SHARMA ,JAIPUR vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR

reassessment - Assessee filed a fresh\nreturn and paid differential tax and interest - Assessment was completed with no\naddition to disclosed income - However, Revenue imposed a penalty under\nSection 271(1)(c), alleging concealment of income or furnishing inaccurate\nparticulars of income - First Appellate Authority cancelled penalty due to lack of\nestablished concealment of income - Tribunal dismissed revenue's appeal

AJOY SHARMA ,JAIPUR vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR

reassessment - Assessee filed a fresh\nreturn and paid differential tax and interest - Assessment was completed with no\naddition to disclosed income - However, Revenue imposed a penalty under\nSection 271(1)(c), alleging concealment of income or furnishing inaccurate\nparticulars of income - First Appellate Authority cancelled penalty due to lack of\nestablished concealment of income - Tribunal dismissed revenue's appeal

RSD CONTAINERS PRIVATE LIMITED,JAIPUR vs. ITO, WARD 7(1), JAIPUR, JAIPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

149. 111. The clock started ticking for the Revenue only after it received the response of the assesses to the show causes notices. After the receipt of the reply, the assessing officer had to perform the following responsibilities: (i) consider the reply of the assessee under section 149A(c); (ii) take a decision under section 149A(d) based

LATE SHRI JITENDRA NAGAR THROUGH HIS L/R SMT. DEEPIKA NAGAR,BARAN vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD BARAN, BARAN

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: The Date Of Hearing.”

c. Section 148A(d) – to pass an order deciding whether or not it is a fit case for issuing a notice under Section 148; and d. Section 148 – to issue a reassessment notice. 80. In Ashish Agarwal (supra), this Court directed that Section 148 notices which were challenged before various High Courts “shall be deemed to have been issued under