DCIT, CC-2, JAIPUR vs. SHRI VIMAL CHAND SURANA(HUF), JAIPUR

In the result, the appeal of the revenue stands dismissed

Bench: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

6. On going through the changes, quoted above, made to section 147 of the Act, we find that, prior to the Direct Tax Laws (Amendment) Act, 1987, reopening could be done under the above two conditions and fulfilment of the said conditions alone conferred jurisdiction on the Assessing Officer to make a back assessment, but in section 147

INCOME TAX OFFICER, JAIPUR vs. KEDIA BUILDERS AND COLONIZERS PRIVATE LIMITED, JAIPUR

In the result, all appeals of the revenue are stands dismissed

reassessment u/s 147 of the Act ignoring that the\nreason to belief of the AO is founded on information which has been received by\nthe AO after completion of assessment, which is a sound foundation for\nexercising power u/s 147 r.w.s 148?\n2.3 In ITA No. 874/JP/2024 the revenue has raised the following grounds;\n1 Whether on the facts

DINESSH KUMAR SHARMA,JAIPUR vs. ITO, WARD4(2), JAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

sections 147 and 148.\n\n27. Consequently, the writ petition is allowed. The impugned reassessment notice issued under\nsection 148 and further proceedings, if any, initiated pursuant to the said notice are set aside.\nThe above decision of Hon'ble High Court squarely applies to the case of appellant, as in the\npresent case also, learned AO did not make

INCOME TAX OFFICER, JAIPUR vs. KEDIA BUILDERS AND COLONIZERS PRIVATE LIMITED, JAIPUR

In the result, all appeals of the revenue are stands dismissed

reassessment u/s 147 of the Act ignoring that the\nreason to belief of the AO is founded on information which has been received by\nthe AO after completion of assessment, which is a sound foundation for\nexercising power u/s 147 r.w.s 148?\n\n2.3 In ITA No. 874/JP/2024 the revenue has raised the following grounds;\n\n1 Whether

INCOME TAX OFFICER, JAIPUR vs. KEDIA BUILDERS AND COLONIZERS PRIVATE LIMITED, JAIPUR

reassessment u/s 147 of the Act ignoring that the\nreason to belief of the AO is founded on information which has been received by\nthe AO after completion of assessment, which is a sound foundation for\nexercising power u/s 147 r.w.s 148?\n2.3 In ITA No. 874/JP/2024 the revenue has raised the following grounds;\n1 Whether on the facts

INCOME TAX OFFICER , SIKAR vs. BHASKAR CHAUHAN, JAIPUR

In the result the appeal of the revenue in ITA no

Bench: Him.

147, section 148, section 149, section 151 and section 153, where the Assessing Officer is satisfied that,- (a) any money, bullion, jewellery or other valuable article or thing, seized or requisitioned, belongs to; or (b) any books of account or documents, seized or requisitioned, pertains or pertain to, or any information contained therein, relates to, A person other than

GEMCO INTERNATIONAL,JAIPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 2(1), JAIPUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands partly allowed with no order as to cost

Bench: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (Judicial Member)

reassess the total income, where search is conducted under section 132 or requisition is made under section 132A. Therefore, in our opinion, the assessing officer is not justified in reopening the assessment under section 147 and his order is illegal and arbitrary. d. In view of above decisions statement of learned AO that no material is handed over

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(2), JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. MUKESH KUMAR SONI, JAIPUR

In the result appeal of the revenue is dismissed and the cross

Bench: Moving Towards The Facts Of The Case We Would Like To Mention

6[(1) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in any other provision of this Act, the assessment, reassessment or recomputation under sub-section (3) of section 143 or under section 144 or under section 147

ASHOK SHARMA,KOTA vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-2 - KOTA, KOTA

section 40A(3). The payments were made at different dates as was replied by the\nassessee alongwith complete details in the reply to notice u/s 154 and also to notice u/s 148 in\nthe proceedings of reassessment. The reply by the assessee was made part of the order u/s 147\nby the ld. AO but was neither touched-upon

SHRI SALASAR BALAJI DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD,JAIPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 2(2), JAIPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

147. [Para 5]\n\nThe effect of the Explanation 3 which was inserted by the Finance (No. 2) Act, 2009 is that, even\nthough the notice issued under section 148 containing the reasons for reopening the assessment\ndoes not contain a reference to a particular issue with reference to which income has escaped\nassessment, yet the Assessing Officer may assess

RAM KHILARI MEENA,DAUSA vs. ITO, DAUSA, DAUSA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member)

6. This court in Majinder Singh Kang's case(supra), considering the scope of Explanation 3 to section 147 of the Act held that the Assessing Officer is empowered to make additions even on the ground on which reassessment

SAVITA GUPTA,KOTA vs. ITO, DELHI

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member)

reassess total income of such other person of such assessment year in the manner provided in section 153A.” 4. Section 153C of the Act begins with a non-obstante clause and overrides sections 139, 147, 148, 149, 151, and 153. It mandates that if during a search (initiated on or before 31st March, 2021], any books of account, documents

AJAY BAKLIWAL,KOTA vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, KOTA, KOTA

reassessment proceedings initiated under Section 148 be upheld as valid\nand in accordance with the law.\n2. The addition of ₹44,62,938/- under Section 2(22)(e) be upheld, as the\nAppellant has failed to disprove the findings of the AO.\n3.\nThe appeal of the Appellant be dismissed, and the order of the Ld. CIT(A)\nbe upheld

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, JAIPUR vs. SHRI PRAKASH CHAND KOTHARI, JAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

section 147 for carrying out the present reassessment proceedings. 30. In this regard, we refer to the reasons recorded by the Assessing Officer before issuance of notice u/s 148 of the Act. In the reasons so recorded, the Assessing Officer refers to the information received from the office of DCIT, Central Circle-03, Jaipur pursuant to search and seizure action

SHRI PRAKASH CHAND KOTHARI,JAIPUR vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, JAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

section 147 for carrying out the present reassessment proceedings. 30. In this regard, we refer to the reasons recorded by the Assessing Officer before issuance of notice u/s 148 of the Act. In the reasons so recorded, the Assessing Officer refers to the information received from the office of DCIT, Central Circle-03, Jaipur pursuant to search and seizure action

SH. KAPIL TANEJA,JAIPUR vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member)

sections of 153C of the Act and therefore consequential order passed u/s 147 of the Act is bad in law and deserves to be quashed. 1.4. That, the Ld. CIT(A) has further erred in confirming the action of ld. AO in reopening the assessment, beyond the specified time line. Thus, the reassessment proceedings initiated is time barred and entire

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. SNEHLATA AGARWAL, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

reassessment matters nor vests any such power in the Id.\nCIT(A). Even other wise the Instruction cannot substitute the independent\nstatutory preconditions under Sections 147/148 read with Section 149,\nwhich provides the timelines for issuance of notice of reopening. Provision\nof such section must be satisfied by the Id. AO at any given point of time,\nwhen the jurisdiction

SMT. SHEELA YOGI,JAIPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, JAIPUR

In the result, ground no. 3 & 4 of the assessee’s appeal are allowed

Bench: Him Under Rule 46A Of The Income Tax Act, 1962. 2(I) On The Facts & Circumstances Of The Case & In Law Also Ld. Lower Authorities Grossly Erred In Initiating Reassessment Proceedings U/S 147 Of The Act.

147 of the Act. 2 Sheela Yogi, Jaipur Vs. ITO, Jaipur (ii) On the facts & circumstances of the case and in law also Ld. AO grossly erred in initiating reassessment proceedings on borrowed satisfaction only. 3. On the facts & circumstances of the case & in law also Ld Lower authorities grossly erred in making and confirming a huge addition