BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “reassessment”+ Section 145Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Chandigarh25Mumbai22Pune4Delhi4Jaipur3Bangalore3Ahmedabad2Hyderabad2Kolkata2Lucknow1Indore1Chennai1Rajkot1Surat1

Key Topics

Section 2636Section 1483Section 142(1)2Section 56(2)(viii)2Addition to Income2

SH. KESAR LAL BAIRWA,A-24, VARUN COLONY, MANDARA STAND, NEW SANGANER ROAD, MANSAROVAR, JAIPUR vs. ITO, WARD-2(4), JAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 381/JPR/2022[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur11 May 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: HON’BLE SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri P.C. Parwal, C.AFor Respondent: Ms Monisha Choudhary (JCIT)
Section 10(37)Section 142(1)Section 148Section 28Section 3Section 56(2)(iii)Section 56(2)(vii)Section 56(2)(viii)Section 57

reassessment proceedings rejected the claim of assessee that the amount so received being capital receipt is not liable for taxation by holding as under :- (i) Supreme court decision in case of CIT vs. Ghanshyam (HUF) was pronounced on 16.07.2009 whereas section 56(2)(viii) was amended thereafter w.e.f. 01.04.2010 after the order of Hon’ble Supreme Court and thus

SHREE AURO IRON LIMITED ,JAIPUR vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-I, JAIPUR

In the result, this appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 788/JPR/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur12 Mar 2025AY 2016-17
Section 142(1)Section 143Section 145ASection 147Section 148Section 151Section 263Section 48

145A but inthe ITR of the\nassessee, this column is left blank, which shows that effect of Rs.2,51,93,726/- has\nnot been considered by the assessee in ITR”\nLd. PCIT has mistaken belief that omission to mention the effect of change in the\nprofit/loss has resulted in underreporting of the income. Part-A-Other\ninformation section

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1-1, KOTA vs. SHRI CHANDI RAM, KOTA

In the result, appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 662/JPR/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur14 Jun 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Sh. Siddharth Ranka (Adv.) &For Respondent: Smt Runi Pal (Addl. CIT)
Section 143(3)

section 145A(b) of the Act. The assessee has capitalized the entire interest receipts in his original ITR and since it was escaped the assessment the reopening proceeding initiated against the assessee. The assessee furnished the details of the legal expenses of Rs. 26,29,000/- and travelling expenditure of Rs. 3,49,330/- over these periods. On perusal