OM KOTHARI FOUNDATION,JAIPUR, RAJASTHAN vs. ITO, (EXEMPTION) WARD-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR, RAJASTHAN

In the result, the appeals of the assessee in ITA No

Bench: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (Judicial Member), DR MITHA LAL MEENA (Accountant Member)

section u/s 147/148 of 1.T. Act, 1961 & reopened the case. That the Ld. CIT(A) also erred in upholding the action of Ld. A.O. for reopening of Assessment. 2 OM KOTHARI FOUNDATION VS ITO (EXEMPTION), WARD -1 , JAIPUR 2. That the Ld. A.O. grossly erred on Law and Facts in not accepting the order of Higher Authorities

SHRI RAI SINGH SIHAG,JAIPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3-1, JAIPUR

In the result, this appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain, Jm & Shri Vikram Singh Yadav, Am Vk;Dj Vihy La-@Ita No. 441/Jp/2019 Assessment Year: 2007-08 Shri Rai Singh Sihag, Cuke I.T.O. Vs. B-105, Vaishali Nagar, Ward- 3(1), Jaipur. Jaipur. Pan No.: Bgvps 4485 F Vihykfkhz@Appellant Izr;Fkhz@Respondent Fu/Kzkfjrh Dh Vksj Ls@ Assessee By : Shri Ashok Kr. Gupta & Shri S.L. Jain (Advs.) Jktlo Dh Vksj Ls@ Revenue By :Shri A.S. Nehra (Addl.Cit) Lquokbz Dh Rkjh[K@ Date Of Hearing : 02/11/2021 Mn?Kks"K.Kk Dh Rkjh[K@ Date Of Pronouncement : 15/11/2021 Vkns'K@ Order Per: Sandeep Gosain, J.M. The Present Appeal Has Been Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of The Ld. Cit(A)-1, Jaipur Dated 13/07/2017 For The A.Y. 2007-08. Following Grounds Have Been Taken By The Assessee: “1. The Reasons For Reopening Of The Assessment Not Valid :- That On The Facts & In The Circumstances Of The Case Ld. Ao Has Grossly Erred In Law & Facts In Invoking Action U/S 147.The Notice For Reassessment Is So Hastily Issued Without Examining The Correct Factual & Legal Position. The Action For Reassessment Is Often Made Without Application Of Mind Fairly & Objectively The Ao. Lakhmani Mewal Das 103 Itr 437 (Sc)

reassessment. Section 292BB of the Act cannot obviate the requirement of complying with a jurisdictional condition. For the Assessing Officer to make an order of assessment under section 143(3) of the Act, it is necessary to issue a notice under section 143(2) of the Act and in the absence of a notice under section 143(2

WHOLE SALE CLOTH MERCHANT ASSOCIATION ,KOTA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE KOTA , KOTA

In the result, the appeals of the assessee in ITA no

section\n11 (2) and 11(1)(a) of the\nAct\n33,50,772/-\n33,50,772/-\n5.\nUnverifiable Creditors\n16,75,286/-\n16,75,286/-\n6.\n15% of Construction\nExpenses\n1,20,00,440/-\n1,20,00,440/-\n7.\nDisallowance of Rs\n3,69,567 out of total\nexpenses

WHOLE SALE CLOTH MERCHANT ASSOCIATION ,KOTA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE KOTA , KOTA

11 and 12 of the Act.\n-\nConfirmed by the Ld.\nCIT(A)\n\n4.\nDisallowance u/s section\n11 (2) and 11(1)(a) of the\nAct\n33,50,772/-\n33,50,772/-\n\n5.\nUnverifiable Creditors\n16,75,286/-\n16,75,286/-\n\n6.\n15% of Construction\nExpenses\n1,20,00,440/-\n1,20,00,440/-\n\n7.\nDisallowance

SHRI DIGAMBER JAIN ATIKSHAYA KESHTRA,PADAMPUA vs. ITO EXEMPTION WARD 1, KAILASH HEIGHTS

In the result appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

reassessment proceedings being illegal and without jurisdiction. 4. In the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, Ld CIT(A) has erred in confirming the action of ld. AO of not allowing exemption to the assessee trust in accordance with section 11(2

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. SNEHLATA AGARWAL, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

2 and others-JP-2025\nDCIT vs. Vaibhav Banka and others\nnotice for reassessment under section 148 (i.e.) if as on the date the\nassessment under section 153A or section 153C was passed, a notice\nunder section 148 could have been issued as per the law then in force,\nthen fresh proceedings for reassessment of such income not arising from

DIPTI GARG,TONK vs. ITO WD, TONK

reassessment proceedings. Thus, the legal issue raised in\nground nos. 1 and 2 are hereby dismissed.\n7. Now coming to the merits of the case raised in the ground nos. 3\nand 4, the grievance of the assessee is against the finding of the Ld.\nCIT(A) confirming the addition made by the AO u/s. 56(2)(viib

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. TRILOK DEWAN, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

2) is to be read in respect of the date of issue of notice for\nreassessment under section 148 (i.e.) if as on the date the assessment\nunder section 153A or section 153C was passed, a notice under section\n148 could have been issued as per the law then in force, then fresh\nproceedings for reassessment of such income

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. PRIYA DEWAN, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

2) is to be read in respect of the date of issue of notice for\nreassessment under section 148 (i.e.) if as on the date the assessment\nunder section 153A or section 153C was passed, a notice under section\n148 could have been issued as per the law then in force, then fresh\nproceedings for reassessment of such income

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. SARITA DEWAN, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

2) is to be read in respect of the date of issue of notice for\nreassessment under section 148 (i.e.) if as on the date the assessment\nunder section 153A or section 153C was passed, a notice under section\n148 could have been issued as per the law then in force, then fresh\nproceedings for reassessment of such income

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. VIPUL BANKA, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

2) is to be read in respect of the date of issue of notice for\nreassessment under section 148 (i.e.) if as on the date the assessment\nunder section 153A or section 153C was passed, a notice under section\n148 could have been issued as per the law then in force, then fresh\nproceedings for reassessment of such income

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. PRIYA DEWAN, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

2) is to be read in respect of the date of issue of notice for\nreassessment under section 148 (i.e.) if as on the date the assessment\nunder section 153A or section 153C was passed, a notice under section\n148 could have been issued as per the law then in force, then fresh\nproceedings for reassessment of such income

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. SARITA DEWAN, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

2) is to be read in respect of the date of issue of notice for\nreassessment under section 148 (i.e.) if as on the date the assessment\nunder section 153A or section 153C was passed, a notice under section\n148 could have been issued as per the law then in force, then fresh\nproceedings for reassessment of such income

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. SNEHLATA AGARWAL, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

2) is to be read in respect of the date of issue of notice for\nreassessment under section 148 (i.e.) if as on the date the assessment\nunder section 153A or section 153C was passed, a notice under section\n148 could have been issued as per the law then in force, then fresh\nproceedings for reassessment of such income

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. USHA BANKA, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

2) is to be read in respect of the date of issue of notice for\nreassessment under section 148 (i.e.) if as on the date the assessment\nunder section 153A or section 153C was passed, a notice under section\n148 could have been issued as per the law then in force, then fresh\nproceedings for reassessment of such income

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR , JAIPUR vs. USHA BANKA, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

2) is to be read in respect of the date of issue of notice for\nreassessment under section 148 (i.e.) if as on the date the assessment\nunder section 153A or section 153C was passed, a notice under section\n148 could have been issued as per the law then in force, then fresh\nproceedings for reassessment of such income

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. SUBHASH CHANDRA BANKA, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

2) is to be read in respect of the date of issue of notice for\nreassessment under section 148 (i.e.) if as on the date the assessment\nunder section 153A or section 153C was passed, a notice under section\n148 could have been issued as per the law then in force, then fresh\nproceedings for reassessment of such income

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. ANIMESH AGARWAL, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

2) is to be read in respect of the date of issue of notice for\nreassessment under section 148 (i.e.) if as on the date the assessment\nunder section 153A or section 153C was passed, a notice under section\n148 could have been issued as per the law then in force, then fresh\nproceedings for reassessment of such income

SHRI KRISHNARAJ BUILDHOME PVT LTD,JAIPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, JAIPUR

11 Taxman 158 (Gauhati)\n\"...The duty to give reasons is a safety-valve against arbitrary exercise of\ndiscretionary power. If such quasi-judicial authorities are permitted to render\norder without reason, apart from arbitrariness there might be potent danger.\n(6) Rasiklal Ranchhodbhai v. CWT [1980] 121 ITR 219 (Guj.),\nThe Hon'ble Court struck down the order