Search: penalty u/s 271

2 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 80Jclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi8 Mumbai7 Jaipur2 Cochin2 Pune2 Ahmedabad1 Kolkata1

Key Topics

Section 80P6 Section 80I5 Section 80A3 Section 80J3 Section 223 Section 271(1)(c)2 Section 80P(2)(a)2 Deduction2 Disallowance2

M/S SHIV KUMAR SUSHIL KUMAR TEA ENTERPRISES PVT. LTD.,KOTA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, KOTA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 75/JPR/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur05 Aug 2019AY 2013-14

For Appellant: Shri B.L. Bhojwani (CA)For Respondent: Shri Kailash Mangal (Addl.CIT)

Section 271(1)(c)Section 44ASection 80ASection 80ISection 80J

271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short the Act). 2. Rival contentions have been heard and record perused. Facts in brief are that the assessee company derives income from trading of tea blended in its own factory and from windmill. During the course of scrutiny assessment, the AO has disallowed the deduction

M/S SHIV KUMAR SUSHIL KUMAR TEA ENTERPRISES PVT. LTD.,KOTA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, KOTA

M/S SHIV KUMAR SUSHIL KUMAR TEA ENTERPRISES PVT. LTD.,KOTA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, KOTA

BARODA RAJASTHAN KSHETRIYA GRAMIN BANK,AJMER vs. DY. CIT (ACIT) CIRCLE -2 AJMER , CR BUILDING,OPP. SESSION COURT,JAIPUR ROAD ,AJMER