AJOY SHARMA ,JAIPUR vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR

u/s 80C at Rs. 1,00,000/-.\nAssessment proceedings for the assessment year 2012-13 had been completed\nunder section 143(3)/148 on 23.08.2018 at an income of Rs. 14,09,150/-. While\nframing assessment, penalty proceedings under section 271

AJOY SHARMA,JAIPUR vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR

u/s 80C at Rs. 1,00,000/-.\nAssessment proceedings for the assessment year 2012-13 had been completed\nunder section 143(3)/148 on 23.08.2018 at an income of Rs. 14,09,150/-. While\nframing assessment, penalty proceedings under section 271

AJOY SHARMA ,JAIPUR vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR

u/s 80C at Rs. 1,00,000/-.\nAssessment proceedings for the assessment year 2012-13 had been completed\nunder section 143(3)/148 on 23.08.2018 at an income of Rs. 14,09,150/-. While\nframing assessment, penalty proceedings under section 271

RAMESH KUMAR,JHUNJHUNU vs. ITO WARD-1 JHUNJHUNU, JHUNJHUNU

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

80C of the Act. As such the investment made by the assessee\nin purchase of aforesaid policies remained unexplained and deserves to be added\nu/s 69 of the Act. Thus, the case was reopened and notice under section 148 of the\nIT Act, 1961 was issued on 20.09.2020 and served electronically to the assessee.\nThe assessee filed his return

RAMESH KUMAR,JHUNJHUNU vs. ITO WARD-1, JHUNJHUNU, JHUNJHUNU

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

80C of the Act. As such the investment made by the assessee\nin purchase of aforesaid policies remained unexplained and deserves to be added\nu/s 69 of the Act. Thus, the case was reopened and notice under section 148 of the\nIT Act, 1961 was issued on 20.09.2020 and served electronically to the assessee.\nThe assessee filed his return

MOHIT JAIN,TONK vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TONK

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

u/s 153C on 30.03.2018, in response to which the assessee filed ITR on 13.04.2018, disclosing an income of Rs.1,68,700/- The papers, alleged as incriminating, had been inventorized as Exhibit 3 of Annexure AS (Page No.1 & Page Nos.22A- Shubham Jain & Ors., Tonk. 28) The description of these documents of this Annexure is as tabulated below – S.No. Exhibit No. Description

ROHIT JAIN,TONK vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER - WARD, TONK

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

u/s 153C on 30.03.2018, in response to which the assessee filed ITR on 13.04.2018, disclosing an income of Rs.1,68,700/- The papers, alleged as incriminating, had been inventorized as Exhibit 3 of Annexure AS (Page No.1 & Page Nos.22A- Shubham Jain & Ors., Tonk. 28) The description of these documents of this Annexure is as tabulated below – S.No. Exhibit No. Description

SHUBHAM JAIN,TONK, RAJASTHAN vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - TONK, MAHA DEVALI, TONK

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

u/s 153C on 30.03.2018, in response to which the assessee filed ITR on 13.04.2018, disclosing an income of Rs.1,68,700/- The papers, alleged as incriminating, had been inventorized as Exhibit 3 of Annexure AS (Page No.1 & Page Nos.22A- Shubham Jain & Ors., Tonk. 28) The description of these documents of this Annexure is as tabulated below – S.No. Exhibit No. Description

SHAILENDRA GARG,SRIGANGANAGAR vs. ACIT/DCIT, CIRCLE-6, JAIPUR

In the result, the appeals of the assesseeare allowed for statistical\npurposes as indicated hereinabove

271(1)(b) of the Act)\n| बनाम\n| The ACIT\n| Shri Shailendra Garg\n| Vs.\n| Circle-6\n| Chak 5 M, Kesrisinghpur,\n| Ganganagar - 335 027\n| Jaipur\n| स्थायीलेखा सं. / जीआईआर सं./PAN/GIR No.: ACQPG 4440 E\n| प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent\n| अपीलार्थी / Appellant\n\nआयकरअपीलसं. / ITA Nos.1558 /JP/2024\nनिर्धारणवर्ष / AssessmentYears : 2015-16\n(Penalty Appeal u/s

ANSHUL JAIN,TONK vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TONK

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed

Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c)\nwere also initiated for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income.\n6. Aggrieved from the order of Assessing Officer, the assessee\npreferred an appeal before the ld. CIT(A) Jaipur-4, who dismissed the\nappeal ex-parte and confirmed the additions made by the AO, stating that\nthe appellant could not controvert the findings given

ANKIT JAIN,TONK vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TONK

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed

Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c)\nwere also initiated for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income.\n6. Aggrieved from the order of Assessing Officer, the assessee\npreferred an appeal before the ld. CIT(A) Jaipur-4, who dismissed the\nappeal ex-parte and confirmed the additions made by the AO, stating that\nthe appellant could not controvert the findings given

ANKIT JAIN,TONK vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TONK

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed

Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c)\nwere also initiated for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income.\n6. Aggrieved from the order of Assessing Officer, the assessee\npreferred an appeal before the ld. CIT(A) Jaipur-4, who dismissed the\nappeal ex-parte and confirmed the additions made by the AO, stating that\nthe appellant could not controvert the findings given

ROHIT JAIN,TONK vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD, TONK

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed

u/s 153C on 30.03.2018, in response\nto which the assessee filed ITR on 13.04.2018, disclosing an income of\nRs.1,68,700/- The papers, alleged as incriminating, had been\ninventorized as Exhibit 3 of Annexure AS (Page No.1 & Page Nos.22A-\n28) The description of these documents of this Annexure is as tabulated\nbelow -\nS.No.\nExhibit No.\n& Page No.\nDescription

MOHIT JAIN,TONK vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TONK

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed

u/s 153C on 30.03.2018, in response\nto which the assessee filed ITR on 13.04.2018, disclosing an income of\nRs.1,68,700/- The papers, alleged as incriminating, had been\ninventorized as Exhibit 3 of Annexure AS (Page No.1 & Page Nos.22A-\n28) The description of these documents of this Annexure is as tabulated\nbelow -\nS.No.\nExhibit No.\n& Page No.\nDescription

SHAILENDRA GARG,SRIGANGANAGAR vs. ACIT/DCIT CIRCLE 6, JAIPUR, JAIPUR

In the result, the appeals of the assesseeare allowed for statistical purposes as indicated hereinabove

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

Penalty Appeal u/s 271B of the Act) Shri Shailendra Garg cuke The ACIT Vs. Chak 5 M, Kesrisinghpur, Circle-6 Ganganagar – 335 027 Jaipur LFkk;hys[kk la-@thvkbZvkj la-@PAN/GIR No.: ACQPG 4440 E vihykFkhZ@Appellant izR;FkhZ@Respondent fu/kZkfjrh dh vksjls@Assesseeby : Shri Prasant Daga, CA jktLo dh vksjls@Revenue by: Smt. Runi Pal, CIT-DR lquokbZ

SHAILENDRA GARG,SRIGANGANAGAR vs. ACIT/DCIT CIRCLE 6, JAIPUR, JAIPUR

In the result, the appeals of the assesseeare allowed for statistical purposes as indicated hereinabove

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

Penalty Appeal u/s 271B of the Act) Shri Shailendra Garg cuke The ACIT Vs. Chak 5 M, Kesrisinghpur, Circle-6 Ganganagar – 335 027 Jaipur LFkk;hys[kk la-@thvkbZvkj la-@PAN/GIR No.: ACQPG 4440 E vihykFkhZ@Appellant izR;FkhZ@Respondent fu/kZkfjrh dh vksjls@Assesseeby : Shri Prasant Daga, CA jktLo dh vksjls@Revenue by: Smt. Runi Pal, CIT-DR lquokbZ

SHAILENDRA GARG,SRIGANGANAGAR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 6, JAIPUR, JAIPUR

In the result, the appeals of the assesseeare allowed for statistical purposes as indicated hereinabove

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

Penalty Appeal u/s 271B of the Act) Shri Shailendra Garg cuke The ACIT Vs. Chak 5 M, Kesrisinghpur, Circle-6 Ganganagar – 335 027 Jaipur LFkk;hys[kk la-@thvkbZvkj la-@PAN/GIR No.: ACQPG 4440 E vihykFkhZ@Appellant izR;FkhZ@Respondent fu/kZkfjrh dh vksjls@Assesseeby : Shri Prasant Daga, CA jktLo dh vksjls@Revenue by: Smt. Runi Pal, CIT-DR lquokbZ

SHAILENDRA GARG,SRIGANGANAGAR vs. ACIT/DCIT CIRCLE 6, JAIPUR, JAIPUR

In the result, the appeals of the assesseeare allowed for statistical purposes as indicated hereinabove

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

Penalty Appeal u/s 271B of the Act) Shri Shailendra Garg cuke The ACIT Vs. Chak 5 M, Kesrisinghpur, Circle-6 Ganganagar – 335 027 Jaipur LFkk;hys[kk la-@thvkbZvkj la-@PAN/GIR No.: ACQPG 4440 E vihykFkhZ@Appellant izR;FkhZ@Respondent fu/kZkfjrh dh vksjls@Assesseeby : Shri Prasant Daga, CA jktLo dh vksjls@Revenue by: Smt. Runi Pal, CIT-DR lquokbZ