BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 272A(2)(g)clear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai25Mumbai16Cuttack8Surat7Visakhapatnam5Jaipur3Delhi3Pune3Nagpur2Raipur2Chandigarh2Hyderabad1Amritsar1Ahmedabad1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)4Section 694Section 115B4Section 271(1)(c)4Section 403Section 2743Deduction3Addition to Income3Section 145(3)

DHANRAJ SETHIA,JAIPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CIRCLE-1

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 169/JPR/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur28 Jun 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Hon’ble SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri Praveen Saraswat, CAFor Respondent: Mrs. Monisha Choudhary, Addl. CIT
Section 194ASection 194A(3)(iii)Section 271Section 271(1)Section 271(1)(c)Section 274Section 40

272A(1) Refused or failed to: (a) Answer questions. (b) Sig. Statements. (c) Attene to give evidence or produce books of accounts etc. in compliance with summons under section 131(1). (d) Apply for allotment of permanent account number in term sof Section 139A. You are hereby requested to appear before me on 21-03-2014 at Room

2
Section 234A2
Business Income2
Unexplained Investment2

SILVER WINGS LIFE SPACES,KOTA vs. DCIT CIRCLE-1 KOTA, KOTA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 511/JPR/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur31 Jul 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Learned Cit(A), Which Appeal Was Filed By The Assessee

For Appellant: Sh. Shrawan Kumar Gupta, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. A. S. Nehra(Addl. CIT)
Section 115BSection 143(3)Section 145(3)Section 234ASection 69

G Bench ITAT order in case of Su-Raj Diamond Dealers Pvt. Ltd. order dated 27.11.2019 vi) Mumbai D bench ITAT order in case of R&H Property Developer Pvt. Ltd. order dated 30.07.2019. The ld. CIT(A) has not speak a single word on theses issue and submission, which show he either has satisfied with our plea

JAGDISH KUMAR ARORA,BHAWANIMANDI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE- KOTA, KOTA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1195/JPR/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur11 Feb 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member), SHRI NARINDER KUMAR (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Sh. Shrawan Kumar Gupta, AdvFor Respondent: Mrs. Anita Rinesh, JCIT-Sr. DR
Section 115BSection 143(3)Section 145(3)Section 234ASection 69

G Bench ITAT order in case of Su-RajDiamond Dealers Pvt Ltd. (order dated 27.11.2019). vi) Mumbai D bench ITAT order in case of R&HProperty DeveloperPvt Ltd. (order dated 30.07.2019). 4. Further the allegation of the ld. CIT(A) that “as per the documents placed on record by the appellant it is not verifiable or seen that the case