ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TA , JAIPUR vs. SHRI NATH CORPORATION, JAIPUR

In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

penalty under Section 271(1)(c), what has to be seen is whether there is\nany concealment in the return filed by the assessee under Section 153A, and not\nvis-a vis the original return under Section 139....\"\"\nApplying the above principle, we note that in the present case, the AO\nhas accepted the assessee's return filed u/s

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JAIPUR vs. JITENDRA KUMAR AGARWAL, JAIPUR

In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

penalty under Section 271(1)(c), what has to be seen is whether there is any concealment in the return filed by the assessee under Section 153A, and not vis-a vis the original return under Section 139…….” Applying the above principle, we note that in the present case, the AO has accepted the assessee’s return filed u/s

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, JAIPUR vs. ROYAL JEWELLERS, JAIPUR

In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

penalty under Section 271(1)(c), what has to be seen is whether there is\nany concealment in the return filed by the assessee under Section 153A, and not\nvis-a vis the original return under Section 139.......\nApplying the above principle, we note that in the present case, the AO\nhas accepted the assessee's return filed u/s

M/S RAJASTHAN STATE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AND INVESTMENT CORPORATION LTD.,JAIPUR vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-6, JAIPUR, JAIPUR

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed as indicated hereinabove

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI GAGAN GOYAL (Accountant Member)

u/s 274 r.w.s. 271(1)(c) was bad in law, as it did not specify under which limb of section 271(1)(c) penalty

M/S RAJASTHAN STATE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT & INVESTMENT CORPORATION LTD.,JAIPUR vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-6, JAIPUR, JAIPUR

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed as indicated\nhereinabove

u/s 271(1)(c) and also on merits. The Ld.\nCIT(A), however, without deciding the legal ground of assessee, confirmed the\nlevy of penalty by applying Explanation 1 to section

SUPERFINE HOTELS PRIVATE LIMITED,JAIPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-6,, JAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

u/s 271(1)(c) vide order\ndated 27.03.2022.\n8.1 Before us, the ld. A/R has submitted that in the show cause notice\nissued under section 274 read with section 271 read with section\n271(1)(c) of the IT Act the AO has not specified the ground for initiation\nof penalty

DWARKA GEMS LIMITED ,JAIPUR vs. ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , JAIPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Section 271-\n272 of the Act was issued on 30/12/2009 by ticking of the notice as under:-\n\"U/s 271(1)(c):- Concealed particulars of income or furnished inaccurate particulars of\nincome\".\nThe ld Assessing Officer again gave notice during the course of penalty

GHANSHYAM TAK,NAYA GHAR AJMER vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE AJMER, JAIPUR ROAD AJMER

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

penalty levied on the basis of stereotyped show cause Notice issued u/s 271 read with section 274 of the Income

RAJ KUMAR JAIN,JAIPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE – 2, JAIPUR, JAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

penalty proceeding were initiated u/s 271 and 275 read with the section u/s 271AAB of the IT Act and a penalty

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, JAIPUR, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2 JAIPUR vs. SHRI PRAKASH CHAND SHARMA, C-42, GOKUL PATH VAISHALI NAGAR, JAIPUR, JAIPUR

In the result, appeals of the revenue are dismissed

Bench: Ao On The Charge Of Concealment Of Income.

section u/s 271(1)(c) the penalty is initiated [i.e. whether penalty initiated for concealment t of income or furnishing

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, JAIPUR, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2 JAIPUR vs. SHRI PRAKASH CHAND SHARMA, C-42, GOKUL PATH VAISHALI NAGAR, JAIPUR, JAIPUR

In the result, appeals of the revenue are dismissed

Bench: Ao On The Charge Of Concealment Of Income.

section u/s 271(1)(c) the penalty is initiated [i.e. whether penalty initiated for concealment t of income or furnishing

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, JAIPUR, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2 JAIPUR vs. SHRI PRAKASH CHAND SHARMA, C-42, GOKUL PATH VAISHALI NAGAR, JAIPUR, JAIPUR

In the result, appeals of the revenue are dismissed

Bench: Ao On The Charge Of Concealment Of Income.

section u/s 271(1)(c) the penalty is initiated [i.e. whether penalty initiated for concealment t of income or furnishing

VAIBHAV GLOBAL LIMITED,JAIPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-5, JAIPUR

In the result, the penalty is directed to be deleted and appeal of the assessee is allowed

u/s 274 read with section 271(1)(c) of the I.T.Act, 1961(for short ‘the Act’) to be bad in law as it did not specify which limb of section 271(1)(c) of the Act, the penalty

VAIBHAV GLOBAL LIMITED,JAIPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-5, JAIPUR

In the result, the penalty is directed to be deleted and appeal of the assessee is allowed

u/s 274 read with section 271(1)(c) of the I.T.Act, 1961(for short ‘the Act’) to be bad in law as it did not specify which limb of section 271(1)(c) of the Act, the penalty

RAMESH CHAND BANSAL,BEAWAR vs. DCIT, AJMER

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed

penalty u/s 271(1)(c) invoking Expl. 5A. Accordingly, Show cause notice u/s 274 r/w section 271(1)(c) of the Act were

NARAYAN HEIGHTS & TOWERS,JAIPUR vs. ITO, JAIPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: The Hearing Of Appeal.”

u/s 274 of the Act should specifically state as to whether penalty is being proposed for concealment of particulars of income or inaccurate particulars of income. In the present case notice under section 274 dated 25/3/2015 enclosed at paper book page 16 reads as under: “Penalty Notice Under Section 274, Read with Section 271 of the IT Act. 1961

R P WOOD PRODUCTS PRIVATE LIMITED,AJMER vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE AJMER, JAIPUR ROAD AJMER

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

penalty levied on the basis of stereotyped show cause Notice issued u/s 271 read with section 274 of the Income

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JAIPUR vs. SHRI KAMAL SETHIA, JAIPUR

In the result, both the appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

section 153A does not specify under which limb the penalty is initiated. Nor does notice u/s 274 do so. It was submitted that for levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c), ld. AO has to apply