BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 268Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Ahmedabad11Delhi9Mumbai6Jaipur3Lucknow2Indore1Amritsar1Raipur1

Key Topics

Section 271(1)(c)3Penalty3

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-7, JAIPUR vs. M/S. GUPTA K.N. CONSTRUCTION, JAIPUR

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 748/JPR/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur08 Aug 2018AY 2012-13
For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri J. C. Kulhari (JCIT) fu/kZkfjrh dh vksj ls@
Section 271(1)Section 271(1)(c)

penalty u/s 271(1)(c) by relying on judicial pronouncement of cases wherein the facts are completely distinct from the facts of the case of the assessee.” 2. None appeared on behalf of the assessee. The ld. D/R has submitted that the tax effect involved in the Revenue’s appeal comes to Rs 11,03,380/- less than

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2, AJMER vs. M/S. JATAN CONSTRUCTION PRIVATE LIMITED, AJMER

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 796/JPR/2018[2014-015]Status: Disposed
ITAT Jaipur
13 Aug 2018
AY 2014-015
For Appellant: Shri Rohit Tiwari (Adv.)For Respondent: Shri J. C. Kulhari (JCIT) fu/kZkfjrh dh vksj ls@
Section 268A(1)Section 271(1)(c)

penalty u/s 271(1)(c) Rs. 16,52,500/-.” 2 ACIT, Ajmer vs. Jatan Construction Pvt. Ltd., Ajmer 2. The ld. D/R has submitted that the tax effect involved in the Revenue’s appeal comes to Rs 16,52,500/- less than Rs 20 lacs which is prescribed threshold limit in terms of the CBDT Circular No. 3/2018 dated 11th

ITO, BHIWADI vs. ROHITASH, ALWAR

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 336/JPR/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur27 Mar 2019AY 2012-13
For Appellant: Shri Siddartha Ranka (Adv)For Respondent: Shri Ashok Khanna (JCIT) fu/kZkfjrh dh vksj ls@
Section 271(1)(c)

penalty of Rs. 12,25,000/- U/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short the Act). 2. At the time of hearing, the ld. AR of the assessee has raised an objection of maintainability of the appeal of the Revenue due to the tax effect not exceeding Rs. 20 lacs as per the CBDT Circle