97 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 220(2)clear
Sorted by relevance
Key Topics
Showing 1–20 of 97 · Page 1 of 5
In the result, the appeals of the revenue stands dismissed, and the
Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member)
271- E beyond 30th June 2008, the Additional CIT defeated the very object of Section 275 (1) (c).” Hon’ble Delhi High Court in the case of Principal Commissioner of Income-tax (Central)- 2 v. Mahesh Wood Products (P.) Ltd. [2017] 82 taxmann.com 39 (Delhi)/[2017] 394 ITR 312 (Delhi)[05-05-2017] held as under:- 29 M/s Gokul Kripa