BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 200A(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai95Delhi35Karnataka25Kolkata19Bangalore16Mumbai9Visakhapatnam7Amritsar3Pune3Jaipur2Nagpur2Raipur2Ahmedabad1SC1Hyderabad1

Key Topics

Section 374Penalty2TDS2

DCIT, CR-7, JAIPUR vs. SHRI ANIL GUPTA, JAIPUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 11/JPR/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur13 Jun 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: The Hearing” Dcit Vs. Shri Anil Gupta

For Appellant: Shri P.C. Parwal ( C.A.)For Respondent: Shri A.S. Nehra (Addl. CIT)a fu/kZkfjrh dh vksj ls@
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 154Section 271(1)(c)Section 37

penalty notice u/s 271(1)(c) r.w.s. 274 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the concealing particulars and furnishing of in accurate particulars of income. 5. Being aggrieved the assessee carried the matter in appeal before the ld. CIT(A) who allowed the relief to the assessee. The relevant findings of the ld. CIT(A) are contained at para

BUREAU FOR PARTNERSHIPS IN RAJASTHAN SOCIETY,JAIPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC, TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for Statistical

ITA 338/JPR/2019[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur20 Feb 2020AY 2017-18

Bench: : Shri Vijay Pal Rao, Jm & Shri Vikram Singh Yadav, Am Vk;Dj Vihy La-@Ita No. 338/Jp/2019 Fu/Kzkj.K O"Kz@Assessment Year : 2017-18 Cuke Bureau For Partnership In Rajasthan The Acit (Cpc Tds) Vs. Society, B-Block, Aayakar Bhawan, Sector-3, Yojana Bhawan, Vaishali,Ghaziabad (U.P.) Tilak Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur Jaipur Lfkk;H Ys[Kk La-@Thvkbzvkj La-@ Pan/Gir No.: Aactb 5302 Q Vihykfkhz@Appellant Izr;Fkhz@Respondent Fu/Kzkfjrh Dh Vksj Ls@ Assessee By : Shri Vishal Gupta, Ca Jktlo Dh Vksj Ls@ Revenue By : Ms. Chanchal Meena, Jcit-Dr Lquokbz Dh Rkjh[K@ Date Of Hearing : 19/02/2020 ?Kks"K.Kk Dh Rkjh[K@ Date Of Pronouncement : 20/02/2020 Vkns'K@ Order Per Vijay Pal Rao, Jm This Appeal By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Of Ld. Cit(A) -3, Jaipur Dated 15-01-2019 Arising From The Order Of Levy Of Fees Passed U/S 200A R.W.S. 234E Of The Act For The Assessment Year 2016-17. The Assessee Has Raised The Following Grounds. ‘’1. Under The Facts & Circumstances Of The Case The Ld. Cit(A) Grossly Erred In Law & Facts By Confirming The Late

For Appellant: Shri Vishal Gupta, CAFor Respondent: Ms. Chanchal Meena, JCIT-DR
Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 234E

1. Under the facts and circumstances of the case the ld. CIT(A) grossly erred in law and facts by confirming the late 2 Bureau for Partnership in Rajasthan Society vs ACIT,CPC, TDS, Ghaziabad filing fees without giving reasonable opportunity of being heard. 2. The ld. CIT(A) has grossly erred in law as well as on the facts