DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRLCE-1, JAIPUR vs. M/S CUROSIS HEALTHCARE PRIVATE LIMITED , JAIPUR

In the result, this appeal of the revenue stands dismissed

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

194H of the Act and But, the assessee; also failed to made TDS thereon. Further, the details of parties, to whom such gold coin were provided by the assessee, have not been provided to this office. Thus, it is evident that the assessee gifted the chain, Kada, gold & silver jewellery to various Doctors or touts for soliciting admission in Nursing

SUNRISE REALCONSULTANCY PRIVATE LIMITED ,BHIWADI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-BHIWADI, BHIWADI

section 144 r.w.s.144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 which is void\nab-initio and deserves to be quashed.\n2. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the Learned CIT(A) has erred\nin confirming the addition of Rs.16,56,453/- made by the Learned Assessing\nOfficer u/s 69 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 on account of alleged

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 2(1), KOTA, KOTA vs. RAM LAL AND SONS, KOTA

In the result, grounds taken by the Revenue are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Gagan Goyal & Shri Narinder Kumarito, Ward 2(1), Kota. ...... Appellant Vs.

194H of the Act). In view of these facts a notice u/s. 148 of the Act was issued on 19.03.2021. The assessee firm neither filed any return in response to the same nor any adjournment requested. Notices u/s. 142(1) of the Act was also issued on 22.06.2021, 20.11.2021 and 19.01.2022. But none of the notices ever complied