VARDHMAN SATHANAKVASI JAIN SRAVAK SANGH,AJMER vs. CIT(E), JAIPUR, JAIPUR

Bench: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

property of assessee. This is incorrect as against the said show cause notice, reply was filed on 22.03.2024 (PB 107-114) along with the original constitution(PB 115-122). Further clause 26 of the amended constitution (PB 23) specifically provides that on dissolution the asset of the society would be merged with other society having same object and registered

RAJASTHAN EXPORT PROMOTION COUNCIL,JAIPUR vs. CIT (EXEMPTION), JAIPUR, JAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical\npurpose

House when a Bill for enacting a\nstatutory provision is being debated are inadmissible for the purpose\nof interpreting the statutory provision but the speech made by the\nmover of the Bill explaining the reason for the introduction of the Bill\ncan certainly be referred to for the purpose of ascertaining the\nmischief sought to be remedied by the legislation

RAM NIWAS MODI CHARITABLE SOCIETY,JAIPUR vs. CIT-EXEMPTION, JAIPUR, JAIPUR

In the result, both the appeal of the assessee are disposed off\nthereby allowing the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

House, Gumanpura,\nKota.\nस्थायीलेखा सं. / जीआईआर सं. / PAN/GIR No.: AAATR8150J\nअपीलार्थी / Appellant प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent\nनिर्धारिती की ओरसे / Assesseeby : Shri Mahendra Gargieya, Adv. &\nShri Devang Gargieya, Adv.\nराजस्व की ओरसे / Revenue by: Mrs. Anita Rinesh, Ld. JCIT\nसुनवाई की तारीख / Date of Hearing : 23/09/2025\nउदघोषणा की तारीख / Date of Pronouncement: 20/11/2025\nआदेश/ORDER\nPER: RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI, AM\nThe present

AJOY SHARMA,JAIPUR vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR

80G to the tune of Rs.\n1,00,000/-, Rs. 20,000, Rs 15,000/-, Rs 1,00,000/- and Rs. 24,000/- respectively\nand further claiming loss under the head “Income from House Property" at Rs\n70,000/-thereby declaring net taxable income of Rs. 10,58,800/- and refund of Rs\n54,810/- was claimed. The return

AJOY SHARMA ,JAIPUR vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR

80G to the tune of Rs.\n1,00,000/-, Rs. 20,000, Rs 15,000/-, Rs 1,00,000/- and Rs. 24,000/- respectively\nand further claiming loss under the head “Income from House Property\" at Rs\n70,000/-thereby declaring net taxable income of Rs. 10,58,800/- and refund of Rs\n54,810/- was claimed. The return

AJOY SHARMA ,JAIPUR vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR

80G to the tune of Rs.\n1,00,000/-, Rs. 20,000, Rs 15,000/-, Rs 1,00,000/- and Rs. 24,000/- respectively\nand further claiming loss under the head “Income from House Property\" at Rs\n70,000/-thereby declaring net taxable income of Rs. 10,58,800/- and refund of Rs\n54,810/- was claimed. The return

AJOY SHARMA ,JAIPUR vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR

80G to the tune of Rs.\n1,00,000/-, Rs. 20,000, Rs 15,000/-, Rs 1,00,000/- and Rs. 24,000/- respectively\nand further claiming loss under the head “Income from House Property" at Rs\n70,000/-thereby declaring net taxable income of Rs. 10,58,800/- and refund of Rs\n54,810/- was claimed. The return

AJOY SHARMA ,JAIPUR vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR

80G to the tune of Rs.\n1,00,000/-, Rs. 20,000, Rs 15,000/-, Rs 1,00,000/- and Rs. 24,000/- respectively\nand further claiming loss under the head “Income from House Property\" at Rs\n70,000/-thereby declaring net taxable income of Rs. 10,58,800/- and refund of Rs\n54,810/- was claimed. The return

CREDAI RAJASTHAN,JAIPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-4(5), JAIPUR

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

house property so it is not income falling under the head income from property as understood by A.O. The Ld. A.O. gave finding in assessment order “djnkrk AOP dh vksj ls izLrqr tokc esa x`g lEifr ls dksbZ vk; izkIr ugha gksuk n'kkZ;k x;k gS tcfd 26,,l ij miyC/k tkudkjh ds vk/kkj ij djnkrk

CARELEAVERS INNER CIRCLE FORUM,JAIPUR vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), JAIPUR

Bench: SHRI GAGAN GOYAL (Accountant Member), SHRI NARINDER KUMAR (Judicial Member)

80G cannot be granted without registration u/s 12AB • Application non maintainable taken benefit of section 11 or 12 3. Arguments heard. File perused. 4. Ld. AR for the appellant has submitted that the appellant is a company incorporated on 25.11.2021 dedicated towards helping young adult who have grown up in orphanages or institutional care. It provides these individuals with crucial