BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

8 results for “house property”+ Section 54Eclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai57Chandigarh51Delhi16Bangalore13Pune8Jaipur8Kolkata8Karnataka5Nagpur2Chennai2SC2Surat1Calcutta1Ahmedabad1

Key Topics

Section 80I16Section 54F16Section 809Section 54B8Deduction8Section 143(3)6Section 115J6Section 544Disallowance4Transfer Pricing

SMT. BIRMA DEVI,JAIPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-6-2, JAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed in terms indicated

ITA 678/JPR/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur12 Apr 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: The Hearing Of This Appeal.”

For Appellant: Shri S.L. Poddar (Adv)For Respondent: Shri B.K. Gupta (CIT-DR)
Section 139(1)Section 139(4)Section 143(3)Section 2(14)(iii)Section 54B

54E proviso 2 relied on the content of the section which says that in case of compulsory acquisition of land, the period of 6 months referred to in the sub section shall be reckoned from the date immediately following the date on which such compensation is received by the assesse. Reliance was placed on the judgment in the case

3
Long Term Capital Gains3
Addition to Income3

SMT. GEETA DEVI,AJMER vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, AJMER

ITA 351/JPR/2018[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur21 Aug 2019AY 2011-12
For Appellant: Shri Mahendra Gargieya (Adv)For Respondent: Shri Rajendra Jha (Addl.CIT)
Section 147Section 154Section 54Section 54F

property has been invested for purchase of residential house, the assessee would be entitled to benefit of section 54F of the Act irrespective of the fact that the transfer was not 5 ITA 351/JP/2018 Geeta Devi Vs ITO completed in all respect. In case of CIT vs. Sambandam Udaykumar 345ITR 389 the Hon’ble High Court has in para

SHRI NARESH JAIN,JAIPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3, JAIPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 159/JPR/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur11 Aug 2020AY 2015-16
For Appellant: Shri Vijay Goyal, CAFor Respondent: Shri K.C. Gupta, JCIT
Section 45Section 48Section 54F

54E, 54 EA, 54EA, 54 EB, 54F, 54G and 54H, be chargeable to income tax under the head "capital gains", and shall be deemed to be the income of the previous year in which the transfer took place. “54F. (1)[Subject to the provisions of sub-section (4), where, in the case of an assessee being an individual

ACIT, KOTA vs. SMT. ZAHIDA BANO, KOTA

In the result, the Revenue appeal is dismissed

ITA 579/JPR/2013[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur15 May 2017AY 2005-06
For Appellant: Shri Mahendra Gargieya (Adv.)For Respondent: Shri Ajay Malik (Addl.CIT)
Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 148Section 2(47)Section 2(47)(v)Section 54F

property has been invested for purchase of residential house, the assessee would be entitled to benefit of section 54F of the Act 8 ACIT vs. Smt. Zahida Bano, Kota irrespective of the fact that the transfer was not completed in all respect. In case of CIT vs. Sambandam Udaykumar 345ITR 389 the Hon’ble High Court has in para

SHREE CEMENT LIMITED,BEAWAR vs. NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTRE, DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue in ITA No

ITA 500/JPR/2023[215-16]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur21 Feb 2024

Bench: or at the time of hearing of this appeal.

For Appellant: Sh. Dilip B Desai(C.A.)For Respondent: Sh. Alka Gautam (CIT) (V.H) &
Section 115JSection 143Section 143(3)Section 144BSection 144B(1)(xvi)Section 80Section 80I

54E could not be taxed u/s. 115J. This decision supports our contention. (k) Supreme Court in the case of D. P. Sandhu Bro. held that the receipts which are not taxable cannot brought to tax under any other section. Deductionclaimed by assessee in the instant case u/s.80IB (10) is not taxable under the normal provisions of the Act cannot

SHREE CEMENT LIMITED,BEAWAR vs. NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTRE, DEPUTY COMMISSIONEROF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE -2, AJMER, AJMER

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue in ITA No

ITA 496/JPR/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur21 Feb 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: or at the time of hearing of this appeal.

For Appellant: Sh. Dilip B Desai(C.A.)For Respondent: Sh. Alka Gautam (CIT) (V.H) &
Section 115JSection 143Section 143(3)Section 144BSection 144B(1)(xvi)Section 80Section 80I

54E could not be taxed u/s. 115J. This decision supports our contention. (k) Supreme Court in the case of D. P. Sandhu Bro. held that the receipts which are not taxable cannot brought to tax under any other section. Deductionclaimed by assessee in the instant case u/s.80IB (10) is not taxable under the normal provisions of the Act cannot

SHREE CEMENT LIMITED,BEAWAR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, AJMER

In the result, this appeal of the assessee is partly allowed and appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 152/JPR/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur07 Aug 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: HON’BLE SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JM & HON’BLE SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Vijay Shah, CAFor Respondent: Shri Arvind Kumar, CIT
Section 115JSection 250Section 32(1)(ii)Section 80Section 80I

54E could not be taxed u/s. 115J. • Hon’ble Calcutta High Court in PCIT -vs.- Ankit metal & Power Ltd. [2019] 416 ITR 591 (Cal.) have held that capital receipts are not income which is chargeable to tax u/s 115JB of the Act as well. In light of above submissions it is humbly submitted that the view

SHREE CEMENT LIMITED,BANGUR NAGAR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, AJMER

In the result, the appeal of the assessee - appellant in ITA No

ITA 1517/JPR/2024[2019-2020]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur24 Jun 2025AY 2019-2020

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri Dilip B. Desai, FCAFor Respondent: Shri Arvind Kumar, CIT-DR
Section 115JSection 143(1)Section 254Section 36(1)(va)Section 80Section 801A

sections (4) to (10) and as increased by the applicable surcharge, for the purposes of the Union, calculated in the manner provided therein, shall be further increased by an additional surcharge, for the purposes of the Union, to be called the “Health and Education Cess on income-tax”, calculated at the rate of four per cent of such income