SNEH LATA DWIVEDI,JAIPUR vs. ITO, JAIPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Section 147 is clearly applicable to the to the facts of the instant case under consideration. It may be mentioned that in the case of ACIT vs. Rajesh Jhaveri Stock Brokers (P) Ltd. (2007) 291 ITR 500 (SC), it was held by the Apex Court that if the AO, for whatever reason, has reason to believe that income has escaped

M/S VIP GROUP HOUSING SOCIETY,JAIPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-4-2, JAIPUR

property amounting to Rs. 15,54,300/- and the profit earned thereupon has not been offered for taxation in absence of any return of income filed u/s 139 of the Act. Notice u/s 148 was thereafter issued and duly served on the assessee. In response, the assessee did not file any return of income. Subsequently, a notice

M/S ANIL KUMAR SINGHAL,JAIPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-4-2, JAIPUR

property amounting to Rs. 15,54,300/- and the profit earned thereupon has not been offered for taxation in absence of any return of income filed u/s 139 of the Act. Notice u/s 148 was thereafter issued and duly served on the assessee. In response, the assessee did not file any return of income. Subsequently, a notice

M/S TOP STAR GROUP HOUSING SOCIETY,JAIPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-4-2, JAIPUR

property amounting to Rs. 15,54,300/- and the profit earned thereupon has not been offered for taxation in absence of any return of income filed u/s 139 of the Act. Notice u/s 148 was thereafter issued and duly served on the assessee. In response, the assessee did not file any return of income. Subsequently, a notice

M/S DARSHAN SINGH,JAIPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-4-1, JAIPUR

property amounting to Rs. 15,54,300/- and the profit earned thereupon has not been offered for taxation in absence of any return of income filed u/s 139 of the Act. Notice u/s 148 was thereafter issued and duly served on the assessee. In response, the assessee did not file any return of income. Subsequently, a notice