PRAKASH PANDHARINATH BAKRE,INDORE vs. PR.CIT-1, JAIPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

house property. The assessee, before ld. AO, duly placed on record the following documents vide reply to ld. AO dated 26.09.2016: 3 Prakash Pandharinath Bakre, Jaipur Vs. Pr. CIT-1, Jaipur • Sale Deed dated 24.11.2014, registered on 30.12.2014 • Purchase Deed dated 10.03.2014 which was containing the details of payment made prior to one year from the date of sale • Possession

PINKCITY JEWELHOUSE PVT LTD. 76, DHULESHWAR GARDEN, JAIPUR,JAIPUR vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-2, JAIPUR, CIRCLE-2, JAIPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed