SHRI SATISH CHANDRA KATTA,JAIPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JAIPUR

House Property\n8,17,320\nIncome from Other Sources\n23,00,000\nTotal\n58,17,320\nThe action of the ld. CIT(A) is illegal, unjustified, arbitrary and against the facts of the\ncase. Relief may please be granted by deleting the said of Rs. 58,17,320.\n10. The appellant craves his rights to add, amend or alter

SIYARAM EXPORTS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,JAIPUR vs. ITO WARD 6(4), JAIPUR, JAIPUR

House Property\n8,17,320\nIncome from Other Sources\n23,00,000\nTotal\n58,17,320\nThe action of the ld. CIT(A) is illegal, unjustified, arbitrary and against the facts of the\ncase. Relief may please be granted by deleting the said of Rs. 58,17,320.\n10. The appellant craves his rights to add, amend or alter

SHRI SATISH CHANDRA KATTA,JAIPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JAIPUR

House Property\n8,17,320\nIncome from Other Sources\n23,00,000\nTotal\n58,17,320\nThe action of the ld. CIT(A) is illegal, unjustified, arbitrary and against the facts of the\ncase. Relief may please be granted by deleting the said of Rs. 58,17,320.\n10. The appellant craves his rights to add, amend or alter

SIYARAM EXPORTS INDIA PVT. LTD.,JAIPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JAIPUR

House Property\n\n8,17,320\n\nIncome from Other Sources\n\n23,00,000\n\nTotal\n\n58,17,320\n\nThe action of the ld. CIT(A) is illegal, unjustified, arbitrary and against the facts of\nthe case. Relief may please be granted by deleting the said of Rs. 58,17,320.\n\n10. The appellant craves

SIYARAM EXPORTS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,JAIPUR vs. ITO WARD 6(4), JAIPUR, JAIPUR

House Property\n8,17,320\n\nIncome from Other Sources\n23,00,000\n\nTotal\n58,17,320\n\nThe action of the ld. CIT(A) is illegal, unjustified, arbitrary and against the facts of the\ncase. Relief may please be granted by deleting the said of Rs. 58,17,320.\n\n10. The appellant craves his rights

SHRI SATISH CHANDRA KATTA,JAIPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JAIPUR

House Property\n8,17,320\nIncome from Other Sources\n23,00,000\nTotal\n58,17,320\nThe action of the ld. CIT(A) is illegal, unjustified, arbitrary and against the facts of the\ncase. Relief may please be granted by deleting the said of Rs. 58,17,320.\n10. The appellant craves his rights to add, amend or alter

SUNIL KUMAR AGARWAL,JAIPUR vs. ACIT, CEN. CIR-2, JAIPUR

In the result the appeal of the assessee in ITA no

Section 68 Case pertains to Asst. Year 1966-67 Decision in favour of: Assessee Cash credits—Addition under s. 68—ITO can make addition under s. 68 as income from undisclosed sources, simultaneously with addition to trading results— However, assessee can claim the addition under s. 68 as covered by intangible additions to trading results—In the present case

RAWAT BAL VIDHA NIKETAN SAMITTEE,JAIPUR vs. ACIT CEN CIR 2, JAIPUR

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purpose

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

section 164 of the Act. Finally, the AO completed the assessment u/s 143(3) of the Act vide order dated 30.12.2019 at a total income of Rs. 4,45,07,229/- in the manner as under:- Particulars Amount Surplus as per original income and expenditure account 1,58,91,657/- Add- undisclosed investment in building as per para

RAWAT BAL VIDHA NIKETAN SAMITTEE,JAIPUR vs. ACIT CEN CIR 2, JAIPUR

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purpose

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

section 164 of the Act. Finally, the AO completed the assessment u/s 143(3) of the Act vide order dated 30.12.2019 at a total income of Rs. 4,45,07,229/- in the manner as under:- Particulars Amount Surplus as per original income and expenditure account 1,58,91,657/- Add- undisclosed investment in building as per para

SHRI GANGA FOUR WHEELS PRIVATE LIMITED ,SIKAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER , SIKAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed with no orders to cost

Bench: Hon’ble SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (Judicial Member)

House,Kheecharo Ka Ward-1 Bas, Jaipur Road, Sikar 332001 Sikar LFkk;h ys[kk la-@thvkbZvkj la-@PAN/GIR No.: AAVCS 1215 R vihykFkhZ@Appellant izR;FkhZ@Respondent fu/kZkfjrh dh vksj ls@Assessee by : Shri Praveen Saraswat, CA jktLo dh vksj ls@Revenue by: Mrs. Monisha Choudhary, Addl. CIT-DR lquokbZ dh rkjh[k@Date of Hearing : 10/09/2024

HARSH AGARWAL,JAIPUR vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR

In the result appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

properties is confirmed and the Ground of Appeal No. 3 & 3.1 are dismissed. “Ground No. 4 & 5 (iii) I have considered the facts of the case and submissions of the appellant and it is observed that page no. 7 & 8 are in the handwriting of the appellant himself and during the course of search, the appellant in response to question

DCIT, JAIPUR vs. AMRAPALI JEWELS PVT. LTD. , JAIPUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed and

Bench: Him.

section 69B of the Act. This section reads as under:- "Amount of investments, etc., not fully disclosed in books of account. Amrapali Jewels Pvt. Ltd. vs. ACIT 69B. Where in any financial year the assessee has made investments or is found to be the owner of any bullion, jewellery or other valuable article, and the Assessing Officer finds that