OM KOTHARI FOUNDATION,JAIPUR, RAJASTHAN vs. ITO, (EXEMPTION) WARD-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR, RAJASTHAN

In the result, the appeals of the assessee in ITA No

Bench: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (Judicial Member), DR MITHA LAL MEENA (Accountant Member)

ab initio and deserve to be annulled. Hence, the Ground No. 1 of the assessee is allowed . 3.0 The Ground No. 2 to 4 of the assessee is regarding invoking the provisions of Section 13(1)(d) of the Act for Investment made in past financial years in shares thereby not allowing the exemption u/s 11/10

VARDHMAN SATHANAKVASI JAIN SRAVAK SANGH,AJMER vs. CIT(E), JAIPUR, JAIPUR

Bench: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

ab)(vi) of IT Act, 1961. 3. The appellant craves to alter, amend and modify any ground of appeal. 4. Necessary cost be awarded to the assessee.” 2.2 In ITANo.696/JPR/2024 the assessee has raised following grounds: - “1. The Ld. CIT(E) has erred on facts and in law in rejecting the application filed by the assessee in Form No. 10AB

VARDHMAN SATHANAKVASI JAIN SRAVAK SANGH,AJMER vs. CIT(E), JAIPUR, JAIPUR

Bench: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

ab)(vi) of IT Act, 1961. 3. The appellant craves to alter, amend and modify any ground of appeal. 4. Necessary cost be awarded to the assessee.” 2.2 In ITANo.696/JPR/2024 the assessee has raised following grounds: - “1. The Ld. CIT(E) has erred on facts and in law in rejecting the application filed by the assessee in Form No. 10AB

RAM NIWAS MODI CHARITABLE SOCIETY,JAIPUR vs. CIT-EXEMPTION, JAIPUR, JAIPUR

In the result, both the appeal of the assessee are disposed off\nthereby allowing the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

House, Gumanpura,\nKota.\nस्थायीलेखा सं. / जीआईआर सं. / PAN/GIR No.: AAATR8150J\nअपीलार्थी / Appellant प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent\nनिर्धारिती की ओरसे / Assesseeby : Shri Mahendra Gargieya, Adv. &\nShri Devang Gargieya, Adv.\nराजस्व की ओरसे / Revenue by: Mrs. Anita Rinesh, Ld. JCIT\nसुनवाई की तारीख / Date of Hearing : 23/09/2025\nउदघोषणा की तारीख / Date of Pronouncement: 20/11/2025\nआदेश/ORDER\nPER: RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI, AM\nThe present

BHAWANI SHANKAR GUPTA,JAIPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 4(1) JAIPUR, JAIPUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

House Property, showing income under the head Profit and Gains from Business and Profession (covered under section 44AD) and Income from Other Sources. Since, assessee was not aware of the technical provisions of turnover etc. related to shares and securities business and since he also suffered loss, same was not declared in return of income. The case of the assessee

SARVANGIN VIKAS SANSTHA,ALWAR vs. CIT(E), JAIPUR, JAIPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical\npurposes

Housing Board,\nAlwar.\nJaipur.\nबनाम | The CIT Exemption,\nVs.\nस्थायीलेखा सं. / जीआईआर सं./PAN/GIR No.: AAABS1361E\nअपीलार्थी / Appellant\nप्रत्यर्थी / Respondent\nनिर्धारिती की ओर से / Assesseeby : Shri P.C. Parwal (C.A.)\nराजस्व की ओर से /Revenue by: Ms Alka Gautam (CIT) (V.H.)\nसुनवाई की तारीख / Date of Hearing\n: 24/09/2024\nउदघोषणा की तारीख / Date of Pronouncement: 30/10/2024\nआदेश/ORDER\nPER

CARELEAVERS INNER CIRCLE FORUM,JAIPUR vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), JAIPUR

Bench: SHRI GAGAN GOYAL (Accountant Member), SHRI NARINDER KUMAR (Judicial Member)

AB was rejected on the following grounds. • Application non maintainable taken benefit of section 11 or 12 Careleavers Inner Circle Forum vs. CIT (E) • Discrepancies in Article of Association • Business objects • Benefit to interested person • Genuineness of Activities The 2nd mentioned application i.e. u/s 80G was rejected on the following two grounds; • Approval u/s 80G cannot be granted without registration

GAU JEEV PARMARTH SEWA SANSTHA,ALWAR vs. CIT(E), JAIPUR, JAIPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

Housing Board Sewa Sthal Upcharadheen Ward, Bhawani Top, Alwar. LFkk;h ys[kk la-@thvkbZvkj la-@PAN/GIR No.: AADTG1614K vihykFkhZ@Appellant izR;FkhZ@Respondent fu/kZkfjrh dh vksj ls@Assesseeby : Shri P. C. Parwal (C.A.) jktLo dh vksj ls@Revenue by: Ms Alka Gautam (CIT) (V.H.) lquokbZ dh rkjh[k@Date of Hearing : 24/09/2024 mn?kks"k.kk dh rkjh[k@Date

KAILASH CHAND MAHESHWARI,JAIPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , JAIPUR

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member)

house of the assessee in a statement recorded u/s. 132(4) of the Act vide question no. 22 recorded on 29.07.2016 assessee admitted that he has incurred expenditure on the marriage of his son Vind and two daughters of his young brother. Since the assessee has not submitted any details/ document in compliance to various notices the expenditure

MUKESH JAIN HUF,JAIPUR vs. DCIT, JAIPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

12A, 1st Avenue, Lal Bahadur\nNagar, JLN Marg, Jaipur\n\nबनाम\n\nDCIT,\nCircle-06,\nJaipur\n\nस्थायी लेखा सं. / जीआईआर सं./PAN/GIR No.: AADHM6397P\n\nअपीलार्थी / Appellant\n\nप्रत्यर्थी / Respondent\n\nनिर्धारिती की ओर से / Assessee by : Sh. Tarun Mittal, CA\nराजस्व की ओर से / Revenue by : MS. Alka Gautam, CIT-DR\n\nसुनवाई की तारीख / Date of Hearing

KAILASH CHAND MAHESHWARI,JAIPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CENTRALCIRCLE-2, JAIPUR

house of the assessee in a statement\nrecorded u/s.132(4) of the Act vide question no. 22 recorded on\n29.07.2016 assessee admitted that he has incurred expenditure on the\nmarriage of his son Vind and two daughters of his young brother. Since the\nassessee has not submitted any details/ document in compliance to various\nnotices the expenditure to the extent

KAILASH CHAND MAHESHWARI,JAIPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, , JAIPUR

house of the assessee in a statement\nrecorded u/s.132(4) of the Act vide question no. 22 recorded on\n29.07.2016 assessee admitted that he has incurred expenditure on the\nmarriage of his son Vind and two daughters of his young brother. Since the\nassessee has not submitted any details/ document in compliance to various\nnotices the expenditure to the extent