SITA DEVI AGARWAL,JAIPUR vs. ITO, WD-4(1), JAIPUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

House, Mumbai which return back by the postal authorities with the remarks ‘’not claim return to sender’’. Further on googal search, the same address is found to be belonged to Patel Manilal Maganlal & Sons, a angadia service provider i.e. courier agent’’ It is also noted that the AO in the assessment order has mentioned that the request of the assessee

ITO, WARD-5(2), JAIPUR vs. SMT. SHAKUNTALA AGARWAL, JAIPUR

In the result, the appeal of the department is allowed

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

penny stock transaction of sale of shares of M/s VMS Industries Ltd. It is seen from the assessment order that the appellant has filed return of income declaring a total income of Rs. 1,47,020/- on 28.03.2013 which consists of income from house property

BIRENDRA SINGH NIRBHAY,SIRSI ROAD JAIPUR RAJASTHAN vs. ITO WARD 3(1) JAIPUR, NCRB INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT STATUE CIRCLE JAIPUR RAJASTHAN

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

penny stock went up to Rajasthan High\ncourt wherein the High court has dismissed the appeal of the department by\nconfirming the deletion of the addition made by the Hon'ble ITAT:-\n1. Principal CIT-1 Vs Ritu Agarwal Shree Ram BhawanITA No 54/2021 order\ndated 10/05/2022 (Jaipur)\nIt has been held that before rendereing the judgement the learned ITAT

ACIT, CC-4, , JAIPUR vs. SHRI ANSHUL JAIN, JAIPUR

In the result appeals of the revenue are dismissed

house property, M/S Maverick Commodity Brokers Pvt. Ltd.& others business or profession and other sources during the year under consideration. 6. The main issues involved in this case as found by the AO in the assessment proceedings is in relation to the alleged long term capital gain added u/s 68 of the Act and commission paid for acquiring such long

ACIT, CC-4, JAIPUR vs. SMT. SUNITA AGARWAL, JAIPUR

In the result appeals of the revenue are dismissed

house property, M/S Maverick Commodity Brokers Pvt. Ltd.& others business or profession and other sources during the year under consideration. 6. The main issues involved in this case as found by the AO in the assessment proceedings is in relation to the alleged long term capital gain added u/s 68 of the Act and commission paid for acquiring such long

ACIT, CC-4, JAIPUR vs. SMT. SUNITA AGARWAL, JAIPUR

In the result appeals of the revenue are dismissed

house property, M/S Maverick Commodity Brokers Pvt. Ltd.& others business or profession and other sources during the year under consideration. 6. The main issues involved in this case as found by the AO in the assessment proceedings is in relation to the alleged long term capital gain added u/s 68 of the Act and commission paid for acquiring such long

ACIT, C.C. -4, JAIPUR vs. MAVERICK COMMODITY BROKERS PVT. LTD., JAIPUR

In the result appeals of the revenue are dismissed

house property, M/S Maverick Commodity Brokers Pvt. Ltd.& others business or profession and other sources during the year under consideration. 6. The main issues involved in this case as found by the AO in the assessment proceedings is in relation to the alleged long term capital gain added u/s 68 of the Act and commission paid for acquiring such long

ACIT, CC-4, JAIPUR vs. SHRI MUKUT BEHARI AGARWAL, JAIPUR

In the result appeals of the revenue are dismissed

house property, M/S Maverick Commodity Brokers Pvt. Ltd.& others business or profession and other sources during the year under consideration. 6. The main issues involved in this case as found by the AO in the assessment proceedings is in relation to the alleged long term capital gain added u/s 68 of the Act and commission paid for acquiring such long

DCIT, JAIPUR vs. VIGYAN LODHA, JAIPUR

In the result, the appeal of the Department is dismissed

House Property, share of profit from Partnership firms, capital gains, dividend and income from other sources. From the documents /paper submitted by the assessee, the AO found that the assessee during the year under consideration has shown Long Term Capital Gains of Rs.4,65,83,342/- and claimed exemption u/s 10(38) of the Act. The transaction of purchase/sale

ACIT, CC-4, JAIPUR vs. SMT. ASHA JAIN, JAIPUR

In the result appeals of the revenue are dismissed and the cross

house property, business or profession, capital gain and other sources during the year under consideration. 7. The main issues involved in this case, as found by the AO in the assessment proceedings is long term capital gain income claimed by the assessee is considered as bogus for an amount of Rs. 11,96,03,020/- and added

ACIT,CC-4, JAIPUR vs. SHRI RAMESH KUMAR MANTRI, JAIPUR

In the result appeals of the revenue are dismissed and the cross

house property, business or profession, capital gain and other sources during the year under consideration. 7. The main issues involved in this case, as found by the AO in the assessment proceedings is long term capital gain income claimed by the assessee is considered as bogus for an amount of Rs. 11,96,03,020/- and added

ACIT, CC-4, JAIPUR vs. SHRI MUKUT BEHARI AGARWAL, JAIPUR

In the result appeals of the revenue are dismissed and the cross

house property, business or profession, capital gain and other sources during the year under consideration. 7. The main issues involved in this case, as found by the AO in the assessment proceedings is long term capital gain income claimed by the assessee is considered as bogus for an amount of Rs. 11,96,03,020/- and added

ACIT, CC-4, JAIPUR vs. SMT. SANGEETA MANTRI, JAIPUR

In the result appeals of the revenue are dismissed and the cross

house property, business or profession, capital gain and other sources during the year under consideration. 7. The main issues involved in this case, as found by the AO in the assessment proceedings is long term capital gain income claimed by the assessee is considered as bogus for an amount of Rs. 11,96,03,020/- and added

ACIT, CC-4, JAIPUR vs. SHRI MUKUT BEHARI AGARWAL, JAIPUR

In the result appeals of the revenue are dismissed and the cross

house property, business or profession, capital gain and other sources during the year under consideration. 7. The main issues involved in this case, as found by the AO in the assessment proceedings is long term capital gain income claimed by the assessee is considered as bogus for an amount of Rs. 11,96,03,020/- and added

ACIT, CC-4, JAIPUR vs. SMT. SUNITA AGARWAL, JAIPUR

In the result appeals of the revenue are dismissed and the cross

house property, business or profession, capital gain and other sources during the year under consideration. 7. The main issues involved in this case, as found by the AO in the assessment proceedings is long term capital gain income claimed by the assessee is considered as bogus for an amount of Rs. 11,96,03,020/- and added

ACIT, CC-4, JAIPUR vs. SHRI MUKESH JAIN, JAIPUR

In the result appeals of the revenue are dismissed and the cross

house property, business or profession, capital gain and other sources during the year under consideration. 7. The main issues involved in this case, as found by the AO in the assessment proceedings is long term capital gain income claimed by the assessee is considered as bogus for an amount of Rs. 11,96,03,020/- and added

ACIT, CC-4, JAIPUR vs. SHRI MUKESH JAIN, JAIPUR

In the result appeals of the revenue are dismissed and the cross

house property, business or profession, capital gain and other sources during the year under consideration. 7. The main issues involved in this case, as found by the AO in the assessment proceedings is long term capital gain income claimed by the assessee is considered as bogus for an amount of Rs. 11,96,03,020/- and added

ACIT,CC-4, JAIPUR vs. SHRI RAMESH KUMAR MANTRI, JAIPUR

In the result appeals of the revenue are dismissed and the cross

house property, business or profession, capital gain and other sources during the year under consideration. 7. The main issues involved in this case, as found by the AO in the assessment proceedings is long term capital gain income claimed by the assessee is considered as bogus for an amount of Rs. 11,96,03,020/- and added