BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “disallowance”+ Section 43A(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai85Delhi84Chennai46Kolkata26Bangalore19Ahmedabad14SC9Pune6Raipur6Hyderabad6Surat4Cochin3Indore2Amritsar2Dehradun2Jaipur2Ranchi2Agra1

Key Topics

Section 14A8Section 143(3)6Section 2635Section 445Section 40A(3)3Section 142(1)2Section 302Disallowance2

M/S SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.,E-8, EPIP RIICO INDUSTRIAL AREA, SITAPURA, JAIPUR vs. PCIT, JAIPUR-2, JAIPUR

In the result, this appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 260/JPR/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur28 Jun 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: HON’BLE SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JM & HON’BLE SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri P.C. Parwal, CAFor Respondent: Shri Ajey Malik, CIT
Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 263Section 30Section 44

disallowable under section 14A of the IT Act should have been computed under Rule 8D of the Act. Therefore, the order of assessment was held to be erroneous as well as prejudicial to the interest of the revenue. In this regard, at the very outset, the ld. A/R submitted before us that during the original 14 Shriram General Insurance

DIGAMBER SINGH & SONS PROPERTIES PRIVATE LIMITED,KUMHER vs. ITO, WD-1, BHARATPUR

The appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 421/JPR/2023[2014-2015]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur31 Oct 2023AY 2014-2015

Bench: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Sh. A. S. Nehra (Addl. CIT)
Section 143Section 143(3)Section 263Section 4Section 40A(3)

43A(3) of income tax. GROUND NO. 2 7 Digamber Singh & Sons Properties Pvt. Ltd vs. ITO The learned Assessing Authority has grossly erred in law as well as facts while Rs. 86,126.00 disallowed under the head of development Exp made order order under section 143(3) rws 263 of the Income tax Act it is against the order