BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “disallowance”+ Section 272A(2)(f)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai35Bangalore21Delhi19Ahmedabad10Pune6Chandigarh6Jaipur4Cuttack3Agra3Chennai3Kolkata3Raipur2Surat2Varanasi1Amritsar1Jodhpur1Rajkot1SC1

Key Topics

Section 409Section 271(1)(c)4Addition to Income4Section 2743Deduction3TDS3Section 271(1)2Section 143(3)2Section 692Section 115B

M/S DANISH PVT. LTD.,JAIPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-6, JAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 623/JPR/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur10 Jul 2019AY 2014-15
For Appellant: Shri Rohan Sogani (CA) &For Respondent: Shri K.C. Meena (Addl. CIT )
Section 139Section 194CSection 40

disallowance is called for under section 40(a)(ia). The default for not furnishing of declaration to the CIT as prescribed will attract the provisions of section 272A(2)(f

DCIT, JAIPUR vs. SHRI PRATEEK KOTHARI, JAIPUR

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

2
Disallowance2
ITA 552/JPR/2017[2013-14]Status: Disposed
ITAT Jaipur
10 Nov 2017
AY 2013-14

Bench: The Hon’Ble High Court.”

For Appellant: Shri Vijay Goyal (CA)For Respondent: Prithviraj Meena (Addl. CIT) fu/kZkfjrh dh vksj ls@
Section 132(4)Section 68

f) DCIT vs. PSM Family Trust 21 Tax World 553 15 Dy. Commissioner of Income-tax, Jaipur Vs Shri Prateek Kothari, Jaipur To hold benami Character of a business, it is essential to prove interlocking, interlacing and inter controlling between the two business. g) Ravi Mathur & Others vs. ACIT 22 Tax World 245 Held that burden to prove Benami nature

JAGDISH KUMAR ARORA,BHAWANIMANDI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE- KOTA, KOTA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1195/JPR/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur11 Feb 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member), SHRI NARINDER KUMAR (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Sh. Shrawan Kumar Gupta, AdvFor Respondent: Mrs. Anita Rinesh, JCIT-Sr. DR
Section 115BSection 143(3)Section 145(3)Section 234ASection 69

f) Deemed income under sections 68/69/69A etc. is separate from any 'head of income. If the assessee claims that the undisclosed investment or undisclosed income falls under any particular head of income, the onus in this regard is on the assessee to show under which clause of with section of the respective head of income the undisclosed income

DHANRAJ SETHIA,JAIPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CIRCLE-1

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 169/JPR/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur28 Jun 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Hon’ble SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri Praveen Saraswat, CAFor Respondent: Mrs. Monisha Choudhary, Addl. CIT
Section 194ASection 194A(3)(iii)Section 271Section 271(1)Section 271(1)(c)Section 274Section 40

272A(1) Refused or failed to: (a) Answer questions. (b) Sig. Statements. (c) Attene to give evidence or produce books of accounts etc. in compliance with summons under section 131(1). (d) Apply for allotment of permanent account number in term sof Section 139A. You are hereby requested to appear before me on 21-03-2014 at Room