KATRATHAL GRAM SEWA SAHKARI SAMITI LIMITED ,KATRATHAL vs. ITO WARD 1 SIKAR, SIKAR

250 of the Income Tax\r\nAct 1961 [ for short Act ]dated 27.05.2025 for the assessment year 2019-\r\n20. Ld. CIT(A) passed that order because the assessee had challenged\r\nassessment order dated 27.02.2024 passed under section 147r.w.s.144\r\nread with section 144B of the Act by National Faceless Assessment Unit of\r\nIncome Tax Department [ for short

DOLCAS BOTANOSYS PVT. LTD. BIKANER,BIKANER vs. ADIT, CPC, BANGLORE/ACIT, C-1 JAIPUR, JAIPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

disallowed under Section 43B or under Section 36(1)(va) of the IT Act.” Para 24: “Accordingly, the substantial question of law is answered against the appellant-revenue and in favour of the assessee.” c. CIT Vs. Udaipur Dugdh Utpadak Sahakari Sangh Ltd. (2014) 366 ITR 163 Relying on various decisions of Hon’ble Supreme Court as also the decision

DEVI SHANKER,JAIPUR, RAJASTHAN vs. DCIT, CPC, BANGALORE, BANGALORE, KARNATAKA

In the result, all these appeals of the assessees are allowed

Section 43B r.w.s. 36(1)(va) of the Act are not applicable for the assessment year under consideration i.e. 2018-19 but will apply from assessment year 2021-22 and subsequent assessment years. Hence, this issue raised in assessee’s appeal is allowed. 17. In other appeal also the facts are identical to the facts involved, in ITA No. 250/JP/2021

GROUP ZERO,JAIPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 6(2), JAIPUR , JAIPUR

In the result, all these appeals of the assessees are allowed

Section 43B r.w.s. 36(1)(va) of the Act are not applicable for the assessment year under consideration i.e. 2018-19 but will apply from assessment year 2021-22 and subsequent assessment years. Hence, this issue raised in assessee’s appeal is allowed. 17. In other appeal also the facts are identical to the facts involved, in ITA No. 250/JP/2021

KARNI KEHAR SECURITY CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED,JAIPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 1, JAIPUR

In the result, all these appeals of the assessees are allowed

Section 43B r.w.s. 36(1)(va) of the Act are not applicable for the assessment year under consideration i.e. 2018-19 but will apply from assessment year 2021-22 and subsequent assessment years. Hence, this issue raised in assessee’s appeal is allowed. 17. In other appeal also the facts are identical to the facts involved, in ITA No. 250/JP/2021

GOSIL EXPORTS PVT LTD,JAIPUR vs. DCIT, CIRCLE -I, JAIPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Due Date Of Filing Return.’’

disallowed under Section 43B of the L.T. Act or under Section 36(1)(va) of the Act. In fact in the above matters one of the party is same as in the present appeals, therefore, the issue is no more res-integra in the light of judgments of this Court referred to supra and, in our view, no substantial question

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. SNEHLATA AGARWAL, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

250. The assessment was completed under Section 153A\nvide order dated 21.09.2021, determining the total income at Rs.73,84,060. This\nresulted in an addition of Rs.42,20,814, which included:\n\na. Disallowance of long-term capital gains exemption of Rs.40,15,061.29 by\ntreating the sale of listed equity shares as a bogus transaction; and\n\nb. Addition

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. SNEHLATA AGARWAL, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

250/-. Hence, there is no additional\nincome disclosed by the assessee in the Return of Income filed u/s 153A of\nthe Act.\nThereafter notice u/s 143(2) of Act was issued on 25-06-2021 which\nwas duly served. Further notice u/s 142(1) of the Act was issued on 11-08-\n2021 and certain details/explanations were called

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. USHA BANKA, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

250/-, Hence, there is no additional\nincome disclosed by the assessee in the Return of Income filed u/s 153A of\nthe Act.\nThereafter notice u/s 143(2) of Act was issued on 25-06-2021 which\nwas duly served. Further notice u/s 142(1) of the Act was issued on 11-08-\n2021 and certain details/explanations were called

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. VIPUL BANKA, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

250/-. Hence, there is no additional\nincome disclosed by the assessee in the Return of Income filed u/s 153A of\nthe Act.\nThereafter notice u/s 143(2) of Act was issued on 25-06-2021 which\nwas duly served. Further notice u/s 142(1) of the Act was issued on 11-08-\n2021 and certain details/explanations were called

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. TRILOK DEWAN, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

250/-, Hence, there is no additional\nincome disclosed by the assessee in the Return of Income filed u/s 153A of\nthe Act.\nThereafter notice u/s 143(2) of Act was issued on 25-06-2021 which\nwas duly served. Further notice u/s 142(1) of the Act was issued on 11-08-\n2021 and certain details/explanations were called

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. SARITA DEWAN, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

250/-, Hence, there is no additional\nincome disclosed by the assessee in the Return of Income filed u/s 153A of\nthe Act.\nThereafter notice u/s 143(2) of Act was issued on 25-06-2021 which\nwas duly served. Further notice u/s 142(1) of the Act was issued on 11-08-\n2021 and certain details/explanations were called

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. SUBHASH CHANDRA BANKA, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

250/-. Hence, there is no additional\nincome disclosed by the assessee in the Return of Income filed u/s 153A of\nthe Act.\nThereafter notice u/s 143(2) of Act was issued on 25-06-2021 which\nwas duly served. Further notice u/s 142(1) of the Act was issued on 11-08-\n2021 and certain details/explanations were called

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. PRIYA DEWAN, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

250/-. Hence, there is no additional\nincome disclosed by the assessee in the Return of Income filed u/s 153A of\nthe Act.\nThereafter notice u/s 143(2) of Act was issued on 25-06-2021 which\nwas duly served. Further notice u/s 142(1) of the Act was issued on 11-08-\n2021 and certain details/explanations were called

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR , JAIPUR vs. USHA BANKA, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

250/-, Hence, there is no additional\nincome disclosed by the assessee in the Return of Income filed u/s 153A of\nthe Act.\nThereafter notice u/s 143(2) of Act was issued on 25-06-2021 which\nwas duly served. Further notice u/s 142(1) of the Act was issued on 11-08-\n2021 and certain details/explanations were called

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. PRIYA DEWAN, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

250/-, Hence, there is no additional\nincome disclosed by the assessee in the Return of Income filed u/s 153A of\nthe Act.\nThereafter notice u/s 143(2) of Act was issued on 25-06-2021 which\nwas duly served. Further notice u/s 142(1) of the Act was issued on 11-08-\n2021 and certain details/explanations were called

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. SARITA DEWAN, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

250/-, Hence, there is no additional\nincome disclosed by the assessee in the Return of Income filed u/s 153A of\nthe Act.\nThereafter notice u/s 143(2) of Act was issued on 25-06-2021 which\nwas duly served. Further notice u/s 142(1) of the Act was issued on 11-08-\n2021 and certain details/explanations were called

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. ANIMESH AGARWAL, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

250/-, Hence, there is no additional\nincome disclosed by the assessee in the Return of Income filed u/s 153A of\nthe Act.\nThereafter notice u/s 143(2) of Act was issued on 25-06-2021 which\nwas duly served. Further notice u/s 142(1) of the Act was issued on 11-08-\n2021 and certain details/explanations were called

CHAMBAL FERTILISERS AND CHEMICALS LIMITED,KOTA vs. DCIT, KOTA

In the result, appeal of the revenue is dismissed

section 36(1)(iii) of the Act as under:- S. MF Investment Redemption Dividend Interest No Days Income Disallowed In INR Date In INR Date 1 Birla Sunlife 50,000,000 23-Jun-11 50,000,000 28-Jun-11 44,587.39 5 61,643.84 15-Apr-11 2 Reliance