BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “disallowance”+ Section 245D(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai105Kolkata21Chennai20Allahabad16Delhi10Visakhapatnam7Pune6Hyderabad4Bangalore3Jaipur3Lucknow2SC2Indore2Chandigarh1Cochin1

Key Topics

Section 12A3Section 103Addition to Income3Section 115B2Section 143(3)2Section 132(4)2Section 142(1)2Disallowance2

RAJESH PRODUCTS,TONK ,RAJASTHAN vs. ACIT, JAIPUR

ITA 626/JPR/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur18 Jul 2024AY 2016-17
For Appellant: Shri Mahesh Jain, CA (Th. V.C)For Respondent: Shri Bhanwar Singh Ratnu, (CIT-DR)
Section 132(1)Section 132(4)Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)

245D(1) dated 08-05-2017. M/s RT Industries\nhad filed a Writ Petition before the Hon'ble Delhi High Court against this order.\n(ii) It is clarified that the above exhibits contain the entries related to M/s Rajesh\nProducts also, apart from those related to M/s RT Industries. For instance, the\nfollowing page nos. of exhibits mention

INDIAN MEDICAL TRUST,JAIPUR vs. DY. CIT, JAIPUR

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed and that of the\nrevenue are dismissed

ITA 685/JPR/2023[A.Y. 2016-2017]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur10 Apr 2024
For Appellant: Shri G.M. Mehta, CAFor Respondent: Shri Arvind Kumar, CIT-DR
Section 10Section 11Section 11(1)(a)Section 12ASection 245D(4)

245D(4) of Act on 30.06.2017. For the year in appeal, as against nil taxable\nincome, the income assessed by ld. AO was Rs.26,28,95,700/- for the reason that ld. AO did not\nallow depreciation of Rs.16,66,58,482, educational expenses of Rs.2,64,16,748/- incurred on\npractical training to the students of BJMC (Bachelor degree

SH. ABHAY KUMAR GODHA,JAIPUR vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 546/JPR/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur21 Jul 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI, AM आयकर अपील सं./ITA No. 546/JPR/2025 निर्धारण वर्ष / Assessment Year : 2017-18 Shri Abhay Kumar Godha 750, Achariyon Ka Rasta, Kishan Pole Bazar Jaipur - 303 003 (Raj) बनाम Vs. The ACIT Circle-1 Jaipur प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent स्थायी लेखा सं. / जी.आई.आर. सं./PAN/GIR No.: AAPPG 4721K अपीलार्थी / Appellant निर्धारिती की ओर से / Assessee by : Shri P.C. Parwal, CA राजस्व की ओर से / Revenue by: Shri Gaurav Awasthi, JCIT-DR स

For Appellant: Shri P.C. Parwal, CAFor Respondent: Shri Gaurav Awasthi, JCIT-DR
Section 115BSection 250Section 36(1)(va)Section 69A

section 115BBE substituted by Taxation Laws (Second Amendment Ac1, 2016 which received the assent of President on 15.12.2016 and made applicable from 01.04.2017 is applicable to any transaction from 01.04.2017 onwards and not to any transaction prior to 01.04.2017 as held by Hon'ble Madras High Coat in case of SMILE Microfinance Ltd. Vs ACIT vide order