INDIAN MEDICAL TRUST,JAIPUR vs. DY. CIT, JAIPUR

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed and that of the\nrevenue are dismissed

245D(4) of Act on 30.06.2017. For the year in appeal, as against nil taxable\nincome, the income assessed by ld. AO was Rs.26,28,95,700/- for the reason that ld. AO did not\nallow depreciation of Rs.16,66,58,482, educational expenses of Rs.2,64,16,748/- incurred on\npractical training to the students of BJMC (Bachelor degree

RAJESH PRODUCTS,TONK ,RAJASTHAN vs. ACIT, JAIPUR

245D(1) dated 08-05-2017. M/s RT Industries\nhad filed a Writ Petition before the Hon'ble Delhi High Court against this order.\n(ii) It is clarified that the above exhibits contain the entries related to M/s Rajesh\nProducts also, apart from those related to M/s RT Industries. For instance, the\nfollowing page nos. of exhibits mention

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR vs. LATE SMT. PUSHPA GOYAL, JAIPUR

In the result, all the three appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

disallowance of indexation cost. 3. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, Ld. CIT(A)-4, Jaipur is justified in treating the shops sold as capital asset instead of stock in trade. 4. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, Ld. CIT(A)-4, Jaipur

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR vs. LATE SMT. PUSHPA GOYAL, JAIPUR

In the result, all the three appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

disallowance of indexation cost. 3. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, Ld. CIT(A)-4, Jaipur is justified in treating the shops sold as capital asset instead of stock in trade. 4. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, Ld. CIT(A)-4, Jaipur

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR vs. LATE SMT. PUSHPA GOYAL, JAIPUR

In the result, all the three appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

disallowance of indexation cost. 3. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, Ld. CIT(A)-4, Jaipur is justified in treating the shops sold as capital asset instead of stock in trade. 4. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, Ld. CIT(A)-4, Jaipur