BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

6 results for “disallowance”+ Section 200Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Indore108Raipur15Delhi12Chennai10Mumbai7Jaipur6Hyderabad5Bangalore4Kolkata4Lucknow2Jodhpur2Karnataka1Pune1Punjab & Haryana1

Key Topics

Section 15420Section 374Section 143(1)4Addition to Income4Section 143(3)3Disallowance3Rectification u/s 1543Section 72(1)2Depreciation2TDS

DYNAMIC POWERTECH PRIVATE LIMITED,JAIPUR vs. DCIT, CIRCLE 4, JAIPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 231/JPR/2025[2023-24]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur08 May 2025AY 2023-24

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Sh. Tarun Mittal, C.AFor Respondent: Sh. Arvind Kumar, CIT-DR
Section 154Section 250

disallowed the 6 Dynamic Powertech Pvt. Ltd. vs. DCIT assessee company's claim under Section 10AA and raised a demand of Rs.66,11,560/-. The appellant immediately filed a rectification request under Section 154 on 22.01.2024 (Rectification Request No. 9091774400220124) highlighting the error in CPC's processing. However, CPC rejected the application on the ground that there was no mistake

M/S BALAJI CONSTRUCTION,AJMER vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-2, AJMER

In the result the appeal of the assessee is allowed

2
ITA 75/JPR/2022[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur16 Aug 2022AY 2016-17
For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Sh. A. S. Nehara, Add. CIT
Section 143(3)Section 154

disallowance of claim for higher depreciation made by the AO be sustained and the appeal of the assessee be dismissed based on the findings recorded in the order of the lower authorities. 8 M/s Balaji Construction/ Dinesh Choudhary vs. ACIT 7. All the ground raised by the assessee in this appeal is on account of action of ld. AO passing

DCIT, CR-7, JAIPUR vs. SHRI ANIL GUPTA, JAIPUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 11/JPR/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur13 Jun 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: The Hearing” Dcit Vs. Shri Anil Gupta

For Appellant: Shri P.C. Parwal ( C.A.)For Respondent: Shri A.S. Nehra (Addl. CIT)a fu/kZkfjrh dh vksj ls@
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 154Section 271(1)(c)Section 37

disallowance is made is not applicable to the facts of the present case. 3. Without prejudice to above, the order passed u/s 154 is also not valid in law. Section 154 of the Act reads as under:- “154. (1) With a view to rectifying any mistake apparent from the record an income-tax authority referred to in section

ADITYA CEMENT,BEHROR vs. ITO, BEHROR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 1491/JPR/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur13 May 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Anand Kumar Gupta, AdvFor Respondent: Mrs. Swapnil Parihar, JCIT-DR a
Section 143(3)Section 154Section 68Section 72(1)

200A | (1A) Where any matter has been considered and decided in any proceeding by way of appeal or revision relating to an order referred to in sub-section (1), the authority passing such order may, notwithstanding anything contained in any law for the time being in force, amend the order under that sub-section in relation to any matter other

RAJASTHAN STATE HEALTH ASSURANCE AGENCY,JAIPUR vs. IT WARD -1(1), JAIPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is disposed of, for statistical purposes

ITA 808/JPR/2025[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur01 Sept 2025AY 2021-22

Bench: BEFORE: SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member), SHRI NARINDER KUMAR (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri Vikas Rajvanshi,CAFor Respondent: Shri Gautam Singh Choudhary, JCIT-DR

disallowed the assessee’s appeal as no reply was submitted to the CIT Appeals hearing notices. Hence, CIT Appeals confirmed interest levied of Rs. 23,46,390 on late deposit of TDS by CPC TDS cell without appreciating the reasonable cause during COVID period i.e. situation beyond the control of the assessee. 6. In support of the assessee’s request

M/S OASIS LABORATORIES PVT. LTD.,SP-2, 22 GODAM INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, JAIPUR vs. CPC, BENGALURU/ ITO, WARD-2(3), JAIPUR, JAIPUR

In the result the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 160/JPR/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur28 Jun 2022AY 2017-18
For Appellant: Sh. P. C. Parwal (CA)For Respondent: Sh. A. S. Nehara (Addl. CIT)
Section 143(1)Section 154Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

200A(1) or 206CB(1) of the IT Act. When an application for rectification is accepted by authority, original order is 'rectified' or corrected. 4.8 The High Court of Karnataka in Kothari Industrial Corporation made the following observations: a) 'Rectification' presupposes the continuance of the original order with the change incorporated and it only process by which an order which