BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “disallowance”+ Section 194Qclear

Sorted by relevance

Jodhpur22Delhi18Chandigarh10Mumbai6Visakhapatnam4Lucknow3Jaipur3Bangalore2Dehradun1Pune1Rajkot1Ahmedabad1

Key Topics

Section 143(1)9Section 194Q6Section 194H5Section 1944TDS3Disallowance2

SANTOSH CHOUDHERY,BARAN vs. ITO WARD-BARAN, BARAN

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed as indicated above

ITA 555/JPR/2024[2023-24]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur29 Aug 2024AY 2023-24

Bench: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri C.P. Chawla, ARFor Respondent: Mrs. Monisha Choudhary, Addl. CIT-DR
Section 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)Section 194Section 194HSection 194Q

section 1941, not 1940", notwithstanding the fact that the appellant is a Kachha Adhatiya (Commission Agent) and registered with Baran- Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti, accordingly shown Adat/Commission as gross receipt in the return of income and consequently erred in confirming disallowance of credit of TDS, u/s 194H & 194Q

KAMLESH KUMAR JAIN,PACHPAHAR vs. DCIT-ACIT CIRCLE-2, KOTA

In the result, the appeal filed by the appellant stands allowed with no orders as to cost

ITA 280/JPR/2024[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur17 Sept 2024AY 2022-23

Bench: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri Anoop Bhatia, CAFor Respondent: Smt. Monisha Choudhary, Addl. CIT-DR
Section 143(1)Section 194J

sections – 194A and 194H are fully declared in ITR i.e. either with same or higher amount than that appearing in Form 26AS, the entire TDS claimed u/s 194A and 194H deserves to be fully allowed. Hence the proportionate TDS disallowed to the extent of ₹1,79,551/- (₹2,09,560 – ₹30,009) i.e. TDS claimed u/s 194Q

MAHESH CHAND GOYAL,ALWAR vs. ITO, WARD 1(2), ALWAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1153/JPR/2024[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur10 Apr 2025AY 2022-23

Bench: Dr. S. Seethalakshmi & Shri Gagan Goyalmahesh Chand Goyal, H-6, Rishi Trading Co., Newanaj Mandi, Alwar 301001 Pan No.:Abtpg9841M ...... Appellant Vs.

For Appellant: Mr.Ankit Gupta, CA, Ld. ARFor Respondent: Mr. Gautam Singh Choudhary, JCIT- Ld. DR
Section 143(1)Section 194HSection 194QSection 234ASection 250

disallowance of TDS credit on proportionate basis whereas the receipts us 194A, 194H and 1941 are already disclosed by the assessee in his ITR also. The mechanism adopted by the Ld. Assessing Officer is arbitrary in nature and therefore, bad in law. Hence the intimation passed u/s 143(1) be quashed. 2 The Ld. Assessing Officer provided the mechanism